Measuring Well-being Influencers: Development and Validation of the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH) Inventory.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401
K Elliott Higgins, Theodora Wingert, Elizabeth W Duggan, Maxwell Mansolf, Jose Hernandez Carcamo, Christine Park
{"title":"Measuring Well-being Influencers: Development and Validation of the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH) Inventory.","authors":"K Elliott Higgins, Theodora Wingert, Elizabeth W Duggan, Maxwell Mansolf, Jose Hernandez Carcamo, Christine Park","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving healthcare professional well-being and reducing burnout requires improving work ecosystems and cultures. Current well-being metrics focus on distal outcomes within individuals ( e.g. , professional fulfillment or burnout). This study developed and evaluated the performance of an inventory measuring perceptions of modifiable workplace dimensions-termed \"influencers\"-that shape healthcare professionals' well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A core team developed the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH), an inventory designed to measure these systemic, occupational well-being influencers ( e.g. , leadership support, psychologic safety, working conditions). After content validation and refinement, 223 healthcare professionals from an academic department of anesthesiology completed WISH alongside established well-being measures, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory; the Professional Fulfillment Index; the Perceived Stress Scale; the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms for meaning, purpose, and life satisfaction; as well as standard items of affective commitment (a measure of engagement) and a standard item assessing intention to leave. Factor analysis was used to assess WISH's internal structure, while correlation and regression analyses assessed its criterion-related validity using the above established measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WISH showed the expected relationships with established well-being measures and outperformed established metrics in predicting affective commitment and intention to leave after adjusting for those measures and/or covariates. Factor analysis indicated that most WISH variance reflects a single common factor, supporting the use of an instrument-level score. Unique variance at the influencer level highlights the added value of examining influencer scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WISH fills a key gap in healthcare professional well-being improvement science by assessing causal factors of well-being and burnout rather than the conditions themselves. This study established initial validity of this unique inventory and further reinforced the relevance of system-level and cultural factors in influencing healthcare professionals' well-being. WISH is well suited to assist healthcare professional well-being improvement efforts driven by system-improvement mindsets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"1025-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving healthcare professional well-being and reducing burnout requires improving work ecosystems and cultures. Current well-being metrics focus on distal outcomes within individuals ( e.g. , professional fulfillment or burnout). This study developed and evaluated the performance of an inventory measuring perceptions of modifiable workplace dimensions-termed "influencers"-that shape healthcare professionals' well-being.

Methods: A core team developed the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH), an inventory designed to measure these systemic, occupational well-being influencers ( e.g. , leadership support, psychologic safety, working conditions). After content validation and refinement, 223 healthcare professionals from an academic department of anesthesiology completed WISH alongside established well-being measures, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory; the Professional Fulfillment Index; the Perceived Stress Scale; the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms for meaning, purpose, and life satisfaction; as well as standard items of affective commitment (a measure of engagement) and a standard item assessing intention to leave. Factor analysis was used to assess WISH's internal structure, while correlation and regression analyses assessed its criterion-related validity using the above established measures.

Results: WISH showed the expected relationships with established well-being measures and outperformed established metrics in predicting affective commitment and intention to leave after adjusting for those measures and/or covariates. Factor analysis indicated that most WISH variance reflects a single common factor, supporting the use of an instrument-level score. Unique variance at the influencer level highlights the added value of examining influencer scores.

Conclusions: WISH fills a key gap in healthcare professional well-being improvement science by assessing causal factors of well-being and burnout rather than the conditions themselves. This study established initial validity of this unique inventory and further reinforced the relevance of system-level and cultural factors in influencing healthcare professionals' well-being. WISH is well suited to assist healthcare professional well-being improvement efforts driven by system-improvement mindsets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量幸福的影响因素:WISH调查表的开发与验证。
背景:提高医疗保健专业人员的幸福感和减少职业倦怠需要改善工作生态系统和文化。目前的幸福指标侧重于个体的远端结果(例如,职业成就感或职业倦怠)。在本研究中,我们开发并评估了一份清单的表现,该清单测量了对可改变的工作场所维度(称为影响者)的感知,这些维度塑造了医疗保健专业人员的幸福感。方法:核心团队开发了医疗保健福祉影响者调查(WISH),这是一份旨在衡量这些系统性职业福祉影响者的清单(例如,领导支持、心理安全、工作条件)。经过内容验证和改进,来自麻醉科学术部门的223名医疗保健专业人员完成了WISH和既定的幸福感测量,包括Maslach倦怠量表(MBI),专业实现指数(PFI),感知压力量表(PSS),意义,目的和生活满意度的PROMIS简短形式,以及情感承诺的标准项目(AC,参与度的衡量标准)和评估离开意图的标准项目(ITL)。采用因子分析对WISH的内部结构进行评价,采用相关分析和回归分析对WISH的标准相关效度进行评价。结果:WISH显示了与已建立的幸福测量的预期关系,并且在调整这些测量和/或协变量后,在预测AC和ITL方面优于已建立的指标。因子分析表明,大多数WISH方差反映了单一的共同因素,支持使用工具水平评分。影响者水平上的独特方差突出了检查影响者分数的附加价值。结论:WISH通过评估幸福感和职业倦怠的因果因素,而非职业倦怠本身,填补了医疗保健专业幸福感改善科学的关键空白。在这里,我们建立了这个独特的清单的初步有效性,并进一步加强了影响医疗保健专业人员福祉的系统层面和文化因素的相关性。WISH是非常适合协助医疗保健专业福祉改善努力驱动的系统改进的心态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Flow-controlled versus Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Liposomal Bupivacaine, Plain Bupivacaine, and Saline for Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks: The CLEVELAND Randomized Trial. Hemoptysis and Hypoxia after Supraglottic Airway Removal. Predicting Preoperative Consultation Clinician Time Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Audit Log Data. Maintaining Lower Fresh Gas Flows When Using Sevoflurane: An Observational Exploration of Data from a Single Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1