Acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine alongside existing malaria interventions in the trial context.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015524
Halimatou Diawara, Jane Grant, Alassane Dicko, Seydou Traore, Djibrilla Issiaka, Fatoumata Koita, Mehreen Datoo, Mala Sylla, Abdrahmane Boncane Dicko, Issaka Sagara, Daniel Chandramohan, Adrian Vs Hill, Brian Greenwood, Jayne Webster
{"title":"Acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine alongside existing malaria interventions in the trial context.","authors":"Halimatou Diawara, Jane Grant, Alassane Dicko, Seydou Traore, Djibrilla Issiaka, Fatoumata Koita, Mehreen Datoo, Mala Sylla, Abdrahmane Boncane Dicko, Issaka Sagara, Daniel Chandramohan, Adrian Vs Hill, Brian Greenwood, Jayne Webster","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine has been shown to provide high protective efficacy against malaria in a phase III trial, and has been recommended for use by WHO. The vaccine will soon be deployed at scale in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to understand the caregiver and community acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine alongside existing malaria prevention interventions, according to the communities of participants in the seasonal R21/Matrix-M phase III trial in Mali.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected to assess the acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine alongside the three R21/Matrix-M or control vaccine priming injections given in the first year of the trial. A total of 33 in-depth interviews (IDIs), 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 45 exit interviews at the trial clinics were conducted with caregivers of trial participants, 18 IDIs and 8 FGDs were conducted with community members, 13 IDIs with community health workers and 8 IDIs with trial field staff. Data were coded using the constructs from Sekhon's theoretical framework on acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine was driven mainly by the high burden of malaria in the highly seasonal study area and consequent demand for a malaria vaccine, a perceived high efficacy of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine, and a high level of trust and confidence in the trial and trial team. These perceptions of the acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine led to a reduced perceived importance of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) among some caregivers, while others viewed R21/Matrix-M, SMC and insecticide-treated nets as complementary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The R21/Matrix-M vaccine was acceptable to caregivers and communities of participants in the R21/Matrix-M phase III trial in Mali. Implementation research is needed to evaluate and ensure co-coverage of complementary malaria control interventions, including SMC in seasonal settings, in the face of the scale-up of R21/Matrix-M and other malaria vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine has been shown to provide high protective efficacy against malaria in a phase III trial, and has been recommended for use by WHO. The vaccine will soon be deployed at scale in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to understand the caregiver and community acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine alongside existing malaria prevention interventions, according to the communities of participants in the seasonal R21/Matrix-M phase III trial in Mali.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected to assess the acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine alongside the three R21/Matrix-M or control vaccine priming injections given in the first year of the trial. A total of 33 in-depth interviews (IDIs), 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 45 exit interviews at the trial clinics were conducted with caregivers of trial participants, 18 IDIs and 8 FGDs were conducted with community members, 13 IDIs with community health workers and 8 IDIs with trial field staff. Data were coded using the constructs from Sekhon's theoretical framework on acceptability.

Results: Acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine was driven mainly by the high burden of malaria in the highly seasonal study area and consequent demand for a malaria vaccine, a perceived high efficacy of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine, and a high level of trust and confidence in the trial and trial team. These perceptions of the acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine led to a reduced perceived importance of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) among some caregivers, while others viewed R21/Matrix-M, SMC and insecticide-treated nets as complementary.

Conclusions: The R21/Matrix-M vaccine was acceptable to caregivers and communities of participants in the R21/Matrix-M phase III trial in Mali. Implementation research is needed to evaluate and ensure co-coverage of complementary malaria control interventions, including SMC in seasonal settings, in the face of the scale-up of R21/Matrix-M and other malaria vaccines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在试验背景下R21/Matrix-M疟疾疫苗与现有疟疾干预措施的可接受性。
背景:在一项三期试验中,R21/Matrix-M疟疾疫苗已显示出对疟疾具有很高的保护功效,并已被世卫组织推荐使用。该疫苗将很快在撒哈拉以南非洲大规模部署。本研究旨在了解护理人员和社区对R21/Matrix-M疫苗以及现有疟疾预防干预措施的接受程度,根据马里季节性R21/Matrix-M III期试验参与者的社区。方法:收集定性数据,评估R21/Matrix-M疫苗在试验第一年与三次R21/Matrix-M或对照疫苗启动注射的可接受性。在试验诊所共与试验参与者的护理人员进行了33次深入访谈、12次焦点小组讨论和45次退出访谈,与社区成员进行了18次深入访谈和8次焦点小组讨论,与社区卫生工作者进行了13次深入访谈,与试验现场工作人员进行了8次深入访谈。使用Sekhon可接受性理论框架中的构念对数据进行编码。结果:R21/Matrix-M疫苗的可接受性主要由以下因素推动:高度季节性研究地区的疟疾高负担以及随之而来的疟疾疫苗需求、人们认为R21/Matrix-M疫苗的高效力以及对试验和试验团队的高度信任和信心。这些对R21/Matrix-M疫苗可接受性的看法导致一些护理人员认为季节性疟疾化学预防(SMC)的重要性降低,而另一些人则认为R21/Matrix-M、SMC和驱虫蚊帐是互补的。结论:在马里进行的R21/Matrix-M III期试验中,护理人员和参与者社区可接受R21/Matrix-M疫苗。面对R21/Matrix-M和其他疟疾疫苗的扩大,需要开展实施研究,以评估和确保包括季节性SMC在内的补充性疟疾控制干预措施的共同覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Understanding motivating and demotivating factors among maternal healthcare professionals in Somalia: a qualitative interview study. Patient, family and clinician priorities for critical care research in Asia and Africa: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership using modified Delphi and nominal group techniques. Implementing effective cataract surgical coverage: a comparative qualitative study in Kenya and Nepal. Forty years later: adult health and non-communicable disease following the 1984-1985 Great Ethiopian Famine - a retrospective cohort study. Embracing complexity and innovation to tackle the social determinants of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1