Nelonemdaz Treatment for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006579
Byeong Jo Chun, Seok Ran Yeom, Sung Phil Chung, Young Hwan Lee, Jungsoo Lee, Yun-Hee Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Jin Soo Lee, Chun San An, Byoung Joo Gwag, Jin-Ho Choi
{"title":"Nelonemdaz Treatment for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Byeong Jo Chun, Seok Ran Yeom, Sung Phil Chung, Young Hwan Lee, Jungsoo Lee, Yun-Hee Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Jin Soo Lee, Chun San An, Byoung Joo Gwag, Jin-Ho Choi","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nelonemdaz is a N -methyl d -aspartate receptor subtype 2B-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist and a potent free-radical scavenger that might ameliorate hypoxic-ischemic brain injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We investigated the efficacy of nelonemdaz for patients with OHCA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter phase II trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This trial enrolled 105 patients at five sites in South Korea between November 18, 2018, and February 23, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>OHCA patients undergoing targeted temperature management.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to high-dose (5250 mg), low-dose (3250 mg), and placebo groups at a 1:1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Patients with a median age of 61 years (82% male) were assigned to the high-dose ( n = 37), low-dose ( n = 35), and placebo ( n = 33) groups. The primary outcome, the serum level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48-52 hours, was evaluated in 93 patients. There was no difference in serum NSE between high-dose (median and interquartile range; 23.7, 15.0-69.9) and placebo (17.5, 13.6-113.0) groups, or between low-dose (26.6, 16.2-83.4) and placebo groups ( p > 0.05). Brain MRI fractional anisotropy was significantly higher in the high-dose group compared with the placebo group (0.465, 0.449-0.485 vs. 0.441, 0.431-0.464; p = 0.028), but not between low-dose (0.462, 0.439-0.480) and placebo groups ( p > 0.05). At day 90, the common odds ratio (95% CI) indicating a numerically favorable shift in the modified Rankin Scale was 1.25 (0.48-3.24) and 1.22 (0.47-3.20) in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, compared with placebo group ( p > 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nelonemdaz treatment of patients after OHCA did not reduce serum NSE levels compared with controls. Patients treated with high-dose nelonemdaz showed higher brain MRI fractional anisotropy suggesting less cerebral white matter damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e772-e782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006579","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Nelonemdaz is a N -methyl d -aspartate receptor subtype 2B-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist and a potent free-radical scavenger that might ameliorate hypoxic-ischemic brain injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We investigated the efficacy of nelonemdaz for patients with OHCA.

Design: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter phase II trial.

Setting: This trial enrolled 105 patients at five sites in South Korea between November 18, 2018, and February 23, 2023.

Participants: OHCA patients undergoing targeted temperature management.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to high-dose (5250 mg), low-dose (3250 mg), and placebo groups at a 1:1:1 ratio.

Measurements and main results: Patients with a median age of 61 years (82% male) were assigned to the high-dose ( n = 37), low-dose ( n = 35), and placebo ( n = 33) groups. The primary outcome, the serum level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48-52 hours, was evaluated in 93 patients. There was no difference in serum NSE between high-dose (median and interquartile range; 23.7, 15.0-69.9) and placebo (17.5, 13.6-113.0) groups, or between low-dose (26.6, 16.2-83.4) and placebo groups ( p > 0.05). Brain MRI fractional anisotropy was significantly higher in the high-dose group compared with the placebo group (0.465, 0.449-0.485 vs. 0.441, 0.431-0.464; p = 0.028), but not between low-dose (0.462, 0.439-0.480) and placebo groups ( p > 0.05). At day 90, the common odds ratio (95% CI) indicating a numerically favorable shift in the modified Rankin Scale was 1.25 (0.48-3.24) and 1.22 (0.47-3.20) in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, compared with placebo group ( p > 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Nelonemdaz treatment of patients after OHCA did not reduce serum NSE levels compared with controls. Patients treated with high-dose nelonemdaz showed higher brain MRI fractional anisotropy suggesting less cerebral white matter damage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼洛奈达治疗院外心脏骤停患者:一项随机临床试验
目的:Nelonemdaz是一种n -甲基d-天冬氨酸受体亚型2b选择性n -甲基d-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂和一种有效的自由基清除剂,可能改善院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后缺氧缺血性脑损伤。我们研究了奈罗奈达对OHCA患者的疗效。设计:双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心II期试验。环境:该试验于2018年11月18日至2023年2月23日期间在韩国的五个地点招募了105名患者。参与者:接受针对性体温管理的OHCA患者。干预措施:患者按1:1:1的比例随机分为高剂量组(5250 mg)、低剂量组(3250 mg)和安慰剂组。测量和主要结果:中位年龄为61岁的患者(82%为男性)被分为高剂量组(n = 37)、低剂量组(n = 35)和安慰剂组(n = 33)。对93例患者进行了48-52小时血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平的评估。高剂量组血清NSE无显著差异(中位数和四分位数范围;23.7, 15.0-69.9)和安慰剂组(17.5,13.6-113.0),或低剂量组(26.6,16.2-83.4)和安慰剂组之间(均p < 0.05)。高剂量组脑MRI各向异性分数明显高于安慰剂组(0.465,0.449-0.485比0.441,0.431-0.464;P = 0.028),但低剂量组(0.462,0.439-0.480)和安慰剂组之间无差异(P < 0.05)。在第90天,与安慰剂组相比,高剂量组和低剂量组的共同优势比(95% CI)分别为1.25(0.48-3.24)和1.22(0.47-3.20),表明修正Rankin量表的数值有利变化(均p < 0.05)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:与对照组相比,在OHCA后接受奈洛奈达治疗的患者血清NSE水平没有降低。接受高剂量奈罗奈达治疗的患者表现出更高的脑MRI分数各向异性,表明脑白质损伤较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
When Strategy Meets Reality: Temperature Management After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. In Their Own Words: Understanding Families' Experience With Death as Part of Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death. Defining the Resolution of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Missing Piece in Critical Care. Disparities in Finding Delirium in Critically Ill Latinos. The Impact of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity on Sepsis Outcomes in Patients Admitted to ICUs: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1