Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1159/000543106
Luis A Marin-Castañeda, Jimena Gonzalez-Salido, Iris E Martínez-Juárez, Nadia Palomera-Garfias, Brandon Flores, Daniela Muñoz-Guerrero, Gerson Ángel Alavez, Geronimo Pacheco Aispuro
{"title":"Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Luis A Marin-Castañeda, Jimena Gonzalez-Salido, Iris E Martínez-Juárez, Nadia Palomera-Garfias, Brandon Flores, Daniela Muñoz-Guerrero, Gerson Ángel Alavez, Geronimo Pacheco Aispuro","doi":"10.1159/000543106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder globally, with about 30% of patients developing resistance despite optimal antiseizure drug therapies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique and offers a potential therapeutic alternative for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, aiming to reduce seizure frequency and improve patient quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was performed on MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 2024. Included articles were randomized controlled trials reporting seizure frequency, IEDs, and adverse events in patients with focal epilepsy treated with tDCS. Quality assessment was conducted using RoB2, and data were analyzed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies involving 253 patients met the inclusion criteria. tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency at 1- and 2-month follow-up compared to placebo, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.62, 95% CI (-5.20, -0.04), p = 0.05 at 1 month and MD of -2.80, 95% CI (-5.08, -0.53), p = 0.02 at 2 months. No significant changes in IEDs were observed. Adverse events were generally mild and consisted of itching, skin rash, and headache being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tDCS reduces seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and is associated with minimal adverse effects. However, there was no significant impact on IEDs, and the studies included exhibited considerable heterogeneity. More standardized research is required to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder globally, with about 30% of patients developing resistance despite optimal antiseizure drug therapies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique and offers a potential therapeutic alternative for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, aiming to reduce seizure frequency and improve patient quality of life.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was performed on MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 2024. Included articles were randomized controlled trials reporting seizure frequency, IEDs, and adverse events in patients with focal epilepsy treated with tDCS. Quality assessment was conducted using RoB2, and data were analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results: Nine studies involving 253 patients met the inclusion criteria. tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency at 1- and 2-month follow-up compared to placebo, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.62, 95% CI (-5.20, -0.04), p = 0.05 at 1 month and MD of -2.80, 95% CI (-5.08, -0.53), p = 0.02 at 2 months. No significant changes in IEDs were observed. Adverse events were generally mild and consisted of itching, skin rash, and headache being the most common.

Conclusion: tDCS reduces seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and is associated with minimal adverse effects. However, there was no significant impact on IEDs, and the studies included exhibited considerable heterogeneity. More standardized research is required to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介癫痫是一种全球流行的神经系统疾病,尽管采用了最佳的抗癫痫药物疗法,但仍有约 30% 的患者产生了耐药性。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性神经调控技术,为耐药性局灶性癫痫提供了一种潜在的替代疗法,旨在降低癫痫发作频率并改善患者的生活质量:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南,在 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 6 月。纳入的文章均为随机对照试验,报告了接受 tDCS 治疗的局灶性癫痫患者的发作频率、IEDs 和不良事件。使用 RoB2 进行了质量评估,并使用随机效应模型对数据进行了分析:与安慰剂相比,tDCS能显著降低随访1个月和2个月时的癫痫发作频率,随访1个月时的平均差(MD)为-2.62,95% CI (-5.20, -0.04),p = 0.05;随访2个月时的平均差(MD)为-2.80,95% CI (-5.08, -0.53),p = 0.02。未观察到 IED 发生明显变化。不良反应一般较轻,最常见的不良反应包括瘙痒、皮疹和头痛。结论:tDCS 可降低耐药局灶性癫痫患者的发作频率,且不良反应极小,但对 IEDs 没有明显影响,纳入的研究也表现出相当大的异质性。需要更多标准化研究来验证这些发现并优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
期刊最新文献
SEX DIFFERENCES IN MARKERS OF CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH LOBAR INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE. Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Evolution in the Times of the Pandemic and Multimedia. Causal Associations Between Tea Consumption and REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Continuous versus Routine Electroencephalography in the Intensive Care Unit: A Review of Current Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1