Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1159/000543831
Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Ammara Tahir, Amna Hussain, Aizaz Ali, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Abdul Qadeer Khan, Maha Sajjad, Fatima Shahid, Shahroon Zahid, Ummara Aslam, Talha Bin Yasin, Aqsa Bilal, Tehreem Fatima, Muhammad Sheraz Hameed, Tehseen Haider, Sajeel Saeed, Abdulqadir J Nashwan
{"title":"Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Ammara Tahir, Amna Hussain, Aizaz Ali, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Abdul Qadeer Khan, Maha Sajjad, Fatima Shahid, Shahroon Zahid, Ummara Aslam, Talha Bin Yasin, Aqsa Bilal, Tehreem Fatima, Muhammad Sheraz Hameed, Tehseen Haider, Sajeel Saeed, Abdulqadir J Nashwan","doi":"10.1159/000543831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ustekinumab is an effective drug in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but inadequate response or loss of response is reported in several patients. Dose escalation by intravenous reinduction or interval shortening may be a suitable option to recapture response. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of dose escalation in IBD patients receiving ustekinumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrails.gov and Cochrane from inception to June 1st, 2024. We conducted a proportional meta-analysis on MetaXL. Our primary outcomes were clinical response and clinical remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight articles were included (n = 2,129 patients). Eighteen studies (692 patients out of 1,218) reported clinical response, with pooled prevalence of 55% (95% CI: 46% - 65%). Out of 1,041 patients, 524 showed clinical remission with pooled prevalence of 51% (95%CI: 42% - 59%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis showcased promising results, in terms of clinical response and remission, in IBD patients receiving dose escalation of ustekinumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ustekinumab is an effective drug in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but inadequate response or loss of response is reported in several patients. Dose escalation by intravenous reinduction or interval shortening may be a suitable option to recapture response. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of dose escalation in IBD patients receiving ustekinumab.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrails.gov and Cochrane from inception to June 1st, 2024. We conducted a proportional meta-analysis on MetaXL. Our primary outcomes were clinical response and clinical remission.

Results: Twenty-eight articles were included (n = 2,129 patients). Eighteen studies (692 patients out of 1,218) reported clinical response, with pooled prevalence of 55% (95% CI: 46% - 65%). Out of 1,041 patients, 524 showed clinical remission with pooled prevalence of 51% (95%CI: 42% - 59%).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showcased promising results, in terms of clinical response and remission, in IBD patients receiving dose escalation of ustekinumab.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Access versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Outcomes of Intermittent Hemodialysis vs. Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study. Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inhaled Aviptadil is a New Hope for Recovery of Lung Damage due to COVID-19. Advancements in Valproate Therapy for Seizures, Migraines and Bipolar Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1