Can Baseline Urodynamic Findings Predict the Outcomes and Complications of Intravesical Injections of Onabotulinum Toxin A for Overactive Bladder?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/nau.70000
Kristina Aleksejeva, Gemma Scrimgeour, Richard Axell, Habiba Yasmin, Mahreen Pakzad, Jeremy Ockrim, Tamsin Greenwell
{"title":"Can Baseline Urodynamic Findings Predict the Outcomes and Complications of Intravesical Injections of Onabotulinum Toxin A for Overactive Bladder?","authors":"Kristina Aleksejeva, Gemma Scrimgeour, Richard Axell, Habiba Yasmin, Mahreen Pakzad, Jeremy Ockrim, Tamsin Greenwell","doi":"10.1002/nau.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravesical Onabotulinum Toxin A (Botox A) injections are an established minimally invasive therapy option for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in adults. We have assessed whether baseline urodynamic findings can predict self-reported patient outcomes and posttreatment voiding difficulties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have conducted a retrospective review of 407 patients (median age 61 years, range 22-94 years, 286 women) who have received intravesical Botox A injections for refractory non-neurogenic OAB symptoms between 2006 and 2018. Patient outcomes were assessed using the 5-point PGI-I scale and incidence of posttreatment voiding difficulties was noted. Results were correlated with the baseline urodynamic findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Good response to Botox A injections was defined as PGI-I scores of 1 and 2, and was seen in 272 patients overall (67%). Women were significantly more likely to have successful outcomes comparing to men (p = 0.034) and the voiding detrusor contraction duration (DCD) was a further classifier for treatment success. Acute posttreatment voiding difficulties requiring catheterization were observed in 96 patients (24%) and were significantly more likely in those with good response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Successful outcomes (based on the self-reported PGI-I score) were more likely in women and correlated positively with the increased duration of voiding detrusor contraction, but no other urodynamic parameters. The risk of developing de novo need to catheterize correlated with patient reported benefit, but not with any baseline urodynamic findings. We did not find pre-existing bladder outflow obstruction, concurrent stress urinary incontinence or complex previous surgical history to adversely affect treatment success.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intravesical Onabotulinum Toxin A (Botox A) injections are an established minimally invasive therapy option for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in adults. We have assessed whether baseline urodynamic findings can predict self-reported patient outcomes and posttreatment voiding difficulties.

Methods: We have conducted a retrospective review of 407 patients (median age 61 years, range 22-94 years, 286 women) who have received intravesical Botox A injections for refractory non-neurogenic OAB symptoms between 2006 and 2018. Patient outcomes were assessed using the 5-point PGI-I scale and incidence of posttreatment voiding difficulties was noted. Results were correlated with the baseline urodynamic findings.

Results: Good response to Botox A injections was defined as PGI-I scores of 1 and 2, and was seen in 272 patients overall (67%). Women were significantly more likely to have successful outcomes comparing to men (p = 0.034) and the voiding detrusor contraction duration (DCD) was a further classifier for treatment success. Acute posttreatment voiding difficulties requiring catheterization were observed in 96 patients (24%) and were significantly more likely in those with good response.

Conclusion: Successful outcomes (based on the self-reported PGI-I score) were more likely in women and correlated positively with the increased duration of voiding detrusor contraction, but no other urodynamic parameters. The risk of developing de novo need to catheterize correlated with patient reported benefit, but not with any baseline urodynamic findings. We did not find pre-existing bladder outflow obstruction, concurrent stress urinary incontinence or complex previous surgical history to adversely affect treatment success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
期刊最新文献
Pathophysiology of Urethral Instability: Dysfunction of Smooth Urethral Musculature. Practice Patterns of Surgeons Seeking Board Certification in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Variation in the Definitions of Urinary Retention in Studies of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Systematic Review. Urinary Diversion as Last Option After Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Iatrogenic Devastated Bladder Outlet. Using a Back-Worn Accelerometer to Capture Nocturia Frequency in Parkinson's: An Exploratory Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1