Impact of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on surgeon action and anastomotic leak in colorectal resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11582-y
Philip D Mc Entee, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Patrick A Boland, Alice Moynihan, Ben Creavin, Ronan A Cahill
{"title":"Impact of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on surgeon action and anastomotic leak in colorectal resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Philip D Mc Entee, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Patrick A Boland, Alice Moynihan, Ben Creavin, Ronan A Cahill","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11582-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) during colorectal surgery either reassures surgeons regarding intestinal perfusion sufficiency or prompts changed surgical strategy by indicating unsuspected insufficiency. This study describes existing evidence supporting ICGFA use in colorectal surgery, particularly regarding impact on intraoperative decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were performed on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases on 5th December 2023, updated to 19th August 2024. Full English language publications of clinical studies in human patients undergoing colorectal resection with primary anastomosis with the use of ICGFA to assess bowel perfusion intraoperatively, with a control group, were included. Pooling of anastomotic leak (AL) rates was performed for primary outcome analysis with odds ratio (OR) and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) calculated regarding leak reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 studies comprising 14,333 patients were included, with 7 randomised controlled trials (2911 patients). Overall, AL rate was 6.8%, 4.5% with ICGFA and 8.5% without (OR:0.47, p < 0.001, NNT 23), increasing to 9.5%, 7.5% and 11.6%, respectively, in randomised controlled trials (OR:0.62, p < 0.01, NNT 25). In rectal resections, AL rate was 4.7% with ICGFA vs 11.5% without (OR: 0.38, p < 0.0001). 26 studies performed ICGFA before and after anastomosis formation and 19 used ICGFA only prior to bowel transection, with no significant difference of AL rate reduction on subgroup testing. ICGFA prompted a change in surgical plan in 8.4% of thirty-four studies reporting this. Interestingly, in these studies, leak rates overall were 3.7% when ICGFA matched surgeon judgement versus 5.7% when it prompted change (OR 0.51, p < 0.0025), versus 7.7% without (OR 0.45, p < 0.0001). In rectal resections, these figures were 5%, 8.8% (OR 0.42, p = 0.01) and 12.0% (OR0.39, p < 0.0001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICGFA colorectal perfusion assessment is associated with lower anastomotic leak rates, especially when confirming surgeons' judgement, and may so stratify patients post-operatively regarding subsequent anastomotic leak rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1473-1489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11582-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) during colorectal surgery either reassures surgeons regarding intestinal perfusion sufficiency or prompts changed surgical strategy by indicating unsuspected insufficiency. This study describes existing evidence supporting ICGFA use in colorectal surgery, particularly regarding impact on intraoperative decisions.

Methods: Searches were performed on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases on 5th December 2023, updated to 19th August 2024. Full English language publications of clinical studies in human patients undergoing colorectal resection with primary anastomosis with the use of ICGFA to assess bowel perfusion intraoperatively, with a control group, were included. Pooling of anastomotic leak (AL) rates was performed for primary outcome analysis with odds ratio (OR) and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) calculated regarding leak reduction.

Results: 45 studies comprising 14,333 patients were included, with 7 randomised controlled trials (2911 patients). Overall, AL rate was 6.8%, 4.5% with ICGFA and 8.5% without (OR:0.47, p < 0.001, NNT 23), increasing to 9.5%, 7.5% and 11.6%, respectively, in randomised controlled trials (OR:0.62, p < 0.01, NNT 25). In rectal resections, AL rate was 4.7% with ICGFA vs 11.5% without (OR: 0.38, p < 0.0001). 26 studies performed ICGFA before and after anastomosis formation and 19 used ICGFA only prior to bowel transection, with no significant difference of AL rate reduction on subgroup testing. ICGFA prompted a change in surgical plan in 8.4% of thirty-four studies reporting this. Interestingly, in these studies, leak rates overall were 3.7% when ICGFA matched surgeon judgement versus 5.7% when it prompted change (OR 0.51, p < 0.0025), versus 7.7% without (OR 0.45, p < 0.0001). In rectal resections, these figures were 5%, 8.8% (OR 0.42, p = 0.01) and 12.0% (OR0.39, p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions: ICGFA colorectal perfusion assessment is associated with lower anastomotic leak rates, especially when confirming surgeons' judgement, and may so stratify patients post-operatively regarding subsequent anastomotic leak rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影对结直肠切除术手术效果及吻合口漏的影响。系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:在结直肠手术中,吲吲胺绿荧光血管造影(ICGFA)可以使外科医生确信肠道灌注充足,也可以通过提示意料之外的不足提示手术策略的改变。本研究描述了支持ICGFA在结直肠手术中使用的现有证据,特别是对术中决策的影响。方法:检索PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane Collaboration数据库,检索时间为2023年12月5日至2024年8月19日。纳入了在行结肠直肠癌一期吻合术的人类患者中使用ICGFA评估术中肠灌注的临床研究的完整英文出版物,并与对照组进行了比较。对吻合口漏(AL)发生率进行汇总,进行主要结局分析,并计算关于减少漏的优势比(OR)和需要治疗的数量(NNT)。结果:纳入45项研究,14333例患者,其中7项随机对照试验(2911例患者)。总体而言,AL率为6.8%,ICGFA组为4.5%,无ICGFA组为8.5% (OR:0.47, p)。结论:ICGFA结直肠灌注评估与吻合口漏率较低相关,特别是在证实外科医生判断时,可对术后吻合口漏率进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Comparative benefits of robotic gastrectomy over laparoscopic surgery across different age and BMI groups. Balloon dilation versus endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of Crohn's anastomotic stricture: experimental randomized study. Comparative seven year outcomes of RYGB and SADI-S as revisional procedures for weight recurrence regain after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss trajectory, reflux control, and metabolic safety. Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric ischemic conditioning before esophagectomy: contemporary practices and insights from an international survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1