Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241311090
Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.","authors":"Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi","doi":"10.1177/23743735241311090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. <b>Objective:</b> Validate <i>Patient Experience Assessment Scale</i> (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. <b>Results:</b> 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. <b>Conclusions:</b> PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241311090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. Objective: Validate Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. Methods: The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. Results: 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. Conclusions: PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining Symptom Management and Quality of Life of Loop Diuretic-Induced Overactive Bladder Among Heart Failure Patients: Physician and Patient Perspectives. Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman. Diverse Patient Experiences of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Guided Peer Support for Generalized Anxiety Disorders. Developing and Validating a User-Friendly Quality Benchmark: Enhancing the Integrity of Online Health Information for Patients and Clinicians. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Identifying Linguistic Gender Bias in Electronic Medical Records (EMRs).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1