Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241311090
Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.","authors":"Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi","doi":"10.1177/23743735241311090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. <b>Objective:</b> Validate <i>Patient Experience Assessment Scale</i> (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. <b>Results:</b> 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. <b>Conclusions:</b> PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241311090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. Objective: Validate Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. Methods: The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. Results: 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. Conclusions: PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿曼三级护理医院患者体验评估量表(PXAS)的开发和验证。
背景:评估患者的观点对高质量的医疗保健至关重要。传统的满意度调查存在主观性的局限性。非西方人口缺乏有效的生态措施。目的:验证三级医院患者体验评价量表(PXAS)的有效性。方法:PXAS的开发包括领域识别、量表创建、语言审查和效度评估。专家们制作了一份包含12个问题的量表,其中包含净推荐人分数(NPS)。语言专家对其进行了清晰和对等的审查。采用内容效度指数(CVI)和面效度指数对内容效度和面效度进行评价。SPSS对数据进行信度分析,并在3 - 4周内进行重测。结果:共纳入464名参与者,年龄以31 ~ 40岁为主。PXAS具有良好的信度(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88)和重测(r = 0.72)。内容效度(I-CVI: 0.83-1.0;S-CVI = 0.93),面部的效度(一致性为98.3%)极佳。大多数人满意(45%优秀,41.2%非常好),37%强烈推荐医院。结论:PXAS量表是评价三级医院患者体验的可靠有效量表。有必要进一步研究其性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Balint Groups as a Workforce and Patient Experience Strategy: Lessons From Implementation. Pediatric Intensive Care-Associated Parental Traumatic Stressors by Parent Report: Beyond the First Year. A Perspective on Observation as Intervention in Chronic Diagnostic Complexity. A Nurse's Perspective Shaped by Illness: What Becoming the Zebra Revealed. Improving Patient Experience and Discharge Readiness in Acute Stroke Care Through a Patient-Oriented Discharge Summary: A Two-Cycle Quality Improvement Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1