Biomarkers for the detection of covert atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: NT-proBNP or BNP.

Hiroshi Shiroto, Joji Hagii
{"title":"Biomarkers for the detection of covert atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: NT-proBNP or BNP.","authors":"Hiroshi Shiroto, Joji Hagii","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation often leads to ischemic stroke. For secondary prevention, clinicians typically switch from antiplatelet to anticoagulant therapy for patients with confirmed atrial fibrillation. This study examined the predictive value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP for detecting covert paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in patients with ischemic stroke (PWIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 438 patients with acute stroke in sinus rhythm on admission from July 2021 to March 2023 and measured their NT-proBNP and BNP levels to evaluate their association with PAF detection. Data analysis included logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curves, and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our 438 enrolled participants, 43 (9.8%) were in the PAF group and the remaining were in the non-PAF group. PAF group patients were older than those in the non-PAF group (PAF group vs. non-PAF group; 84 [78-89] vs. 79 [71-85] years) and had higher levels of both NT-proBNP (581.0 [264.5-1234.5] vs. 168.0 [76.0-412.5] pg/mL]) and BNP (186.0 [100.4-313.0] vs. 56.4 [26.9-118.0] pg/mL). The PAF group also had a higher prevalence of chronic heart failure (30% vs. 10%). Both biomarkers were independent predictors of PAF detection, and there was no significant difference in their predictive accuracy for PAF. However, BNP had a slight advantage in IDI scores over NT-proBNP (-0.03 [-0.05 to -0.01]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NT-proBNP and BNP can both effectively predict covert PAF in PWIS in sinus rhythm. Thus, either biomarker should be incorporated into treatment planning strategies for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation often leads to ischemic stroke. For secondary prevention, clinicians typically switch from antiplatelet to anticoagulant therapy for patients with confirmed atrial fibrillation. This study examined the predictive value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP for detecting covert paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in patients with ischemic stroke (PWIS).

Methods: We enrolled 438 patients with acute stroke in sinus rhythm on admission from July 2021 to March 2023 and measured their NT-proBNP and BNP levels to evaluate their association with PAF detection. Data analysis included logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curves, and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: Among our 438 enrolled participants, 43 (9.8%) were in the PAF group and the remaining were in the non-PAF group. PAF group patients were older than those in the non-PAF group (PAF group vs. non-PAF group; 84 [78-89] vs. 79 [71-85] years) and had higher levels of both NT-proBNP (581.0 [264.5-1234.5] vs. 168.0 [76.0-412.5] pg/mL]) and BNP (186.0 [100.4-313.0] vs. 56.4 [26.9-118.0] pg/mL). The PAF group also had a higher prevalence of chronic heart failure (30% vs. 10%). Both biomarkers were independent predictors of PAF detection, and there was no significant difference in their predictive accuracy for PAF. However, BNP had a slight advantage in IDI scores over NT-proBNP (-0.03 [-0.05 to -0.01]).

Conclusion: NT-proBNP and BNP can both effectively predict covert PAF in PWIS in sinus rhythm. Thus, either biomarker should be incorporated into treatment planning strategies for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Vertebral artery involvement in giant cell arteritis: Symptoms, treatment and outcome Association between Fibrinogen and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease. Exploring the bidirectional relationships between alzheimer's disease and cerebral small vessel disease: Insights from mendelian randomization Survey on Neurological Monitoring Practices and Clinician Perspectives in Acute Stroke Care. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to aspirin for embolic stroke of undetermined source: A comprehensive meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1