Vertebral artery involvement in giant cell arteritis: Symptoms, treatment and outcome

Johann Lambeck , Axel Schläger , Nils Venhoff , Cornelius Weiller , Christoph Strecker , Matthias Reinhard
{"title":"Vertebral artery involvement in giant cell arteritis: Symptoms, treatment and outcome","authors":"Johann Lambeck ,&nbsp;Axel Schläger ,&nbsp;Nils Venhoff ,&nbsp;Cornelius Weiller ,&nbsp;Christoph Strecker ,&nbsp;Matthias Reinhard","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) of the vertebral artery (VA) is a rare but serious cause of ischemic stroke, however, the long-term clinical and sonographic course of GCA patients with VA involvement (VA+) is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients with suspected GCA who were consecutively referred to our ultrasound (US) lab over a 12-year-period were analyzed. US examination (GCA-specific) of the cranial and cervical arteries was performed. Patients with a positive US diagnosis of GCA were identified, and further analysis was restricted to VA+ patients. Follow-up data were extracted from our hospital database.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 785 patients screened for GCA, 220 showed typical US-based findings for GCA, 74 (34 %) of whom were VA+. Fourteen VA+ patients (19 %) had vertebrobasilar ischemia at presentation (11 stroke, 3 TIA). Cerebral ischemia was more frequent in patients with severe compared to moderate VA occlusive disease (35 % vs 9 %; <em>p</em> = 0.0099, OR = 5.39, 95 % CI 1.50–9.42). Two patients died from severe initial stroke. Follow-up data were available for 34 VA+ patients (46 % of all VA+ patients; median period, 740 days), where 13 (38 %) displayed stable US alterations to the VA, 14 (41 %) a regression and 7 (21 %) a progression of stenosis. Four patients (12 %) had vertebrobasilar re-stroke, 3 of them within 30days of treatment initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>One-third-of patients with cranial GCA were VA+, 19 % of whom had vertebrobasilar stroke, of which most had severe VA occlusive disease. Significant rates of stenosis progression and recurrent stroke therefore call for early intensive immunosuppressive treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 108260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725000394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) of the vertebral artery (VA) is a rare but serious cause of ischemic stroke, however, the long-term clinical and sonographic course of GCA patients with VA involvement (VA+) is poorly understood.

Methods

All patients with suspected GCA who were consecutively referred to our ultrasound (US) lab over a 12-year-period were analyzed. US examination (GCA-specific) of the cranial and cervical arteries was performed. Patients with a positive US diagnosis of GCA were identified, and further analysis was restricted to VA+ patients. Follow-up data were extracted from our hospital database.

Results

Among the 785 patients screened for GCA, 220 showed typical US-based findings for GCA, 74 (34 %) of whom were VA+. Fourteen VA+ patients (19 %) had vertebrobasilar ischemia at presentation (11 stroke, 3 TIA). Cerebral ischemia was more frequent in patients with severe compared to moderate VA occlusive disease (35 % vs 9 %; p = 0.0099, OR = 5.39, 95 % CI 1.50–9.42). Two patients died from severe initial stroke. Follow-up data were available for 34 VA+ patients (46 % of all VA+ patients; median period, 740 days), where 13 (38 %) displayed stable US alterations to the VA, 14 (41 %) a regression and 7 (21 %) a progression of stenosis. Four patients (12 %) had vertebrobasilar re-stroke, 3 of them within 30days of treatment initiation.

Conclusion

One-third-of patients with cranial GCA were VA+, 19 % of whom had vertebrobasilar stroke, of which most had severe VA occlusive disease. Significant rates of stenosis progression and recurrent stroke therefore call for early intensive immunosuppressive treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Vertebral artery involvement in giant cell arteritis: Symptoms, treatment and outcome Exploring the bidirectional relationships between alzheimer's disease and cerebral small vessel disease: Insights from mendelian randomization Survey on Neurological Monitoring Practices and Clinician Perspectives in Acute Stroke Care. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to aspirin for embolic stroke of undetermined source: A comprehensive meta-analysis Evaluating the Strengths and Limitations of Structured Modified Rankin Scale Validation Studies - A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1