Predictors of mortality in a large cohort of elders with essential tremor.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroepidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1159/000543879
Ericka D Carter, Diane S Berry, Stephanie Cosentino, Elan D Louis
{"title":"Predictors of mortality in a large cohort of elders with essential tremor.","authors":"Ericka D Carter, Diane S Berry, Stephanie Cosentino, Elan D Louis","doi":"10.1159/000543879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective data show an increased risk of mortality in essential tremor (ET). Understanding the contributors to this increased mortality is of value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>347 cases enrolled in a prospective study of cognition in elders with ET (M baseline age = 79.6 years, M follow-up length = 2.7 years). At each visit, cases completed clinical assessments, a cognitive test battery and were assigned a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Cox proportional hazards regression equations identified predictors of cases' relative risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 (11.8%) of 347 cases died during follow-up. Deceased cases were older at baseline, had fewer years of education, used more medication, had more severe tremor, had more gait impairment, and reported more falls, less physical activity, and more depressive symptoms than did living cases. In univariate analyses, a CDR score of 1 or 2 (dementia) was associated with a six-fold increased the risk of mortality (Hazards ratio, HR = 6.33). Moderate rather than milder levels of dementia (CDR 2 rather than 1) were driving this effect, with multivariate models demonstrating HRs in excess of 7.5 (p <0.001). Gait impairment and falls were also associated with significant increased risk of mortality in multivariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified several factors that may be used to risk-stratify ET patients with respect to mortality. The information from these analyses can be of value in identifying subgroups of ET patients who demonstrate risk for early death; such subgroups can then be targeted for interventions as well as preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54730,"journal":{"name":"Neuroepidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prospective data show an increased risk of mortality in essential tremor (ET). Understanding the contributors to this increased mortality is of value.

Methods: 347 cases enrolled in a prospective study of cognition in elders with ET (M baseline age = 79.6 years, M follow-up length = 2.7 years). At each visit, cases completed clinical assessments, a cognitive test battery and were assigned a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Cox proportional hazards regression equations identified predictors of cases' relative risk of mortality.

Results: 41 (11.8%) of 347 cases died during follow-up. Deceased cases were older at baseline, had fewer years of education, used more medication, had more severe tremor, had more gait impairment, and reported more falls, less physical activity, and more depressive symptoms than did living cases. In univariate analyses, a CDR score of 1 or 2 (dementia) was associated with a six-fold increased the risk of mortality (Hazards ratio, HR = 6.33). Moderate rather than milder levels of dementia (CDR 2 rather than 1) were driving this effect, with multivariate models demonstrating HRs in excess of 7.5 (p <0.001). Gait impairment and falls were also associated with significant increased risk of mortality in multivariate models.

Conclusion: We identified several factors that may be used to risk-stratify ET patients with respect to mortality. The information from these analyses can be of value in identifying subgroups of ET patients who demonstrate risk for early death; such subgroups can then be targeted for interventions as well as preventive measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:前瞻性数据显示,本质性震颤(ET)患者的死亡风险增加。方法:347 个病例参加了一项有关 ET 患者认知能力的前瞻性研究(平均基线年龄 = 79.6 岁,平均随访时间 = 2.7 年)。每次就诊时,病例都要完成临床评估和认知测试,并进行临床痴呆评级(CDR)。Cox 比例危险回归方程确定了病例相对死亡风险的预测因素:347例病例中有41例(11.8%)在随访期间死亡。与存活病例相比,死亡病例的基线年龄更大,受教育年限更短,用药更多,震颤更严重,步态障碍更严重,跌倒更多,体力活动更少,抑郁症状更多。在单变量分析中,CDR 评分为 1 分或 2 分(痴呆)的患者的死亡风险增加了六倍(危险比,HR = 6.33)。中度而非轻度痴呆(CDR 2 分而非 1 分)是这一效应的驱动因素,多变量模型显示 HR 超过了 7.5(p 结论:CDR 2 分或 2 分以上的痴呆患者的死亡风险增加了 6 倍:我们发现了几个可用于对 ET 患者死亡率进行风险分级的因素。这些分析得出的信息可用于确定有早死风险的 ET 患者亚群;然后可针对这些亚群采取干预措施和预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroepidemiology
Neuroepidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroepidemiology'' is the only internationally recognised peer-reviewed periodical devoted to descriptive, analytical and experimental studies in the epidemiology of neurologic disease. The scope of the journal expands the boundaries of traditional clinical neurology by providing new insights regarding the etiology, determinants, distribution, management and prevention of diseases of the nervous system.
期刊最新文献
The Association Between Green Tea Consumption and Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence. Microsurgical Treatment versus Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Study in Northern China. Secular trends of the incidence of encephalitis and outcomes of postencephalitic epilepsy in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based study. Predictors of mortality in a large cohort of elders with essential tremor. Burden of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Asia from 1990 to 2030: A Population-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1