Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure With Scleral Lenses of Different Diameters.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167
Juan Queiruga-Piñeiro, Irene Martínez-Alberquilla, Ignacio Rodríguez-Uña, Alberto Barros, Javier Lozano-Sanroma, Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto, Jesús Merayo-Lloves
{"title":"Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure With Scleral Lenses of Different Diameters.","authors":"Juan Queiruga-Piñeiro, Irene Martínez-Alberquilla, Ignacio Rodríguez-Uña, Alberto Barros, Javier Lozano-Sanroma, Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto, Jesús Merayo-Lloves","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the short-term influence of scleral lenses (SL) with different diameters on intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanics. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between fluid reservoir (FR) thickness and IOP and biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy subjects were randomly fitted with L1 (diameter of 15.80 mm) and L2 (diameter of 16.80 mm) on the right eye and worn for 2 hr. On IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured with the CORVIS ST before and after SL removal. Fluid reservoir thickness at 0 and 2 hr of wear was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biomechanical parameters decreased after removal of L1 (-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) (P<0.01) and L2 (-0.80±1.74 mm Hg) (P=0.02). The biomechanical parameters A1T (-0.11±0.18 ms) (P=0.01) and SP-A1 (-4.29±9.97 mm Hg/mm) (P=0.02) decreased after L1 removal, whereas a decrease in highest concavity time (-0.21±0.50 m/s) (P=0.03) and an increase in highest concavity radius (+0.17±0.43 mm) (P=0.04) were observed after L2 removal. A significant, negative, and moderate correlation was found between highest concavity deformation amplitude and FR thickness with L1 (r=-0.42, P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The small changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP values induced by short-term SL wear have no significant clinical impact and were not influenced by the diameter of the SL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term influence of scleral lenses (SL) with different diameters on intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanics. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between fluid reservoir (FR) thickness and IOP and biomechanical parameters.

Methods: Thirty healthy subjects were randomly fitted with L1 (diameter of 15.80 mm) and L2 (diameter of 16.80 mm) on the right eye and worn for 2 hr. On IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured with the CORVIS ST before and after SL removal. Fluid reservoir thickness at 0 and 2 hr of wear was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Results: Biomechanical parameters decreased after removal of L1 (-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) (P<0.01) and L2 (-0.80±1.74 mm Hg) (P=0.02). The biomechanical parameters A1T (-0.11±0.18 ms) (P=0.01) and SP-A1 (-4.29±9.97 mm Hg/mm) (P=0.02) decreased after L1 removal, whereas a decrease in highest concavity time (-0.21±0.50 m/s) (P=0.03) and an increase in highest concavity radius (+0.17±0.43 mm) (P=0.04) were observed after L2 removal. A significant, negative, and moderate correlation was found between highest concavity deformation amplitude and FR thickness with L1 (r=-0.42, P=0.02).

Conclusions: The small changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP values induced by short-term SL wear have no significant clinical impact and were not influenced by the diameter of the SL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Rigid Corneal Lenses for Visual Rehabilitation in Infants With Unilateral Aphakia After Cataract Surgery: A Longitudinal Case Series. Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure With Scleral Lenses of Different Diameters. Evaluating the Protective Effects of a Dispersive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device Versus Balanced Salt Solution on the Cornea During Cataract Surgery. Clinical Investigation of Short-Term Axial Elongation Control After Orthokeratology Lens Correction: Exploring Its Predictive Role in Long-Term Therapeutic Efficacy. Referral Pattern and Comanagement of Patients With Keratoconus in West Africa: A Survey-Based Study of Optometrists in Ghana and Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1