Broad-Scale Meta-Analysis of Drivers Mediating Adverse Impacts of Flow Regulation on Riparian Vegetation

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70042
Xiaolei Su, María Dolores Bejarano, Roland Jansson, Francesca Pilotto, Judith M. Sarneel, Feng Lin, Yi Wang, Fu Cai, Shan Wu, Bo Zeng
{"title":"Broad-Scale Meta-Analysis of Drivers Mediating Adverse Impacts of Flow Regulation on Riparian Vegetation","authors":"Xiaolei Su, María Dolores Bejarano, Roland Jansson, Francesca Pilotto, Judith M. Sarneel, Feng Lin, Yi Wang, Fu Cai, Shan Wu, Bo Zeng","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over two-thirds of global rivers are subjected to flow regulation. Although it is widely recognized that flow regulation can adversely affect riparian vegetation—a critical component of river ecosystems—the specific roles of various drivers remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted a broad-scale meta-analysis, aiming to elucidate how different factors mediate the adverse impacts of flow regulation on riparian vegetation. This meta-analysis encompassed 59 papers, spanning 278 dams constructed on 146 rivers. We extracted data on four key indices of riparian vegetation: species richness and abundance of all riparian species, and those indices exclusively for non-native species. Indices were compared between regulated and free-flowing or pre-damming rivers to quantify the impact of flow regulation. Our meta-analysis revealed a moderate but significant reduction in the richness and abundance of all riparian species under flow regulation, coupled with a strong increase in the abundance of non-native species. Riparian vegetation in arid and continental climate regions experienced stronger negative impacts than those in tropical and temperate climates. Furthermore, the adverse effects on riparian vegetation were more pronounced downstream of dams than upstream. Considering climate region, study identity, and relative position to the dam as random variables, it became evident that years since flow regulation emerged as the most important factor influencing species richness. Over time, richness gradually recovered from initially low levels. However, this recovery was slowed by increasing flow regulation intensity (percentage of annual runoff stored). Additionally, the impact was more evident in larger rivers. To support regulated river management, we recommend prioritizing the protection of riparian vegetation in arid and continental climates, with emphasis on areas downstream of dams, limiting flow regulation intensity, particularly in larger rivers, and monitoring non-native species to prevent disproportionate spread.","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over two-thirds of global rivers are subjected to flow regulation. Although it is widely recognized that flow regulation can adversely affect riparian vegetation—a critical component of river ecosystems—the specific roles of various drivers remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted a broad-scale meta-analysis, aiming to elucidate how different factors mediate the adverse impacts of flow regulation on riparian vegetation. This meta-analysis encompassed 59 papers, spanning 278 dams constructed on 146 rivers. We extracted data on four key indices of riparian vegetation: species richness and abundance of all riparian species, and those indices exclusively for non-native species. Indices were compared between regulated and free-flowing or pre-damming rivers to quantify the impact of flow regulation. Our meta-analysis revealed a moderate but significant reduction in the richness and abundance of all riparian species under flow regulation, coupled with a strong increase in the abundance of non-native species. Riparian vegetation in arid and continental climate regions experienced stronger negative impacts than those in tropical and temperate climates. Furthermore, the adverse effects on riparian vegetation were more pronounced downstream of dams than upstream. Considering climate region, study identity, and relative position to the dam as random variables, it became evident that years since flow regulation emerged as the most important factor influencing species richness. Over time, richness gradually recovered from initially low levels. However, this recovery was slowed by increasing flow regulation intensity (percentage of annual runoff stored). Additionally, the impact was more evident in larger rivers. To support regulated river management, we recommend prioritizing the protection of riparian vegetation in arid and continental climates, with emphasis on areas downstream of dams, limiting flow regulation intensity, particularly in larger rivers, and monitoring non-native species to prevent disproportionate spread.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
Broad-Scale Meta-Analysis of Drivers Mediating Adverse Impacts of Flow Regulation on Riparian Vegetation Local- and Regional-Scale Climate Variability Drives Complex Patterns of Growth Synchrony and Asynchrony in Deep-Sea Snappers Across the Indo-Pacific Reducing Fire Severity and Extent Bolsters Subalpine Forest Resilience to Global Change Through Key Demographic Pathways Zoonotic Host Richness in the Global Wildland–Urban Interface Soil Moisture Threshold of Methane Uptake in Alpine Grassland Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1