Broad-Scale Meta-Analysis of Drivers Mediating Adverse Impacts of Flow Regulation on Riparian Vegetation

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70042
Xiaolei Su, María Dolores Bejarano, Roland Jansson, Francesca Pilotto, Judith M. Sarneel, Feng Lin, Yi Wang, Fu Cai, Shan Wu, Bo Zeng
{"title":"Broad-Scale Meta-Analysis of Drivers Mediating Adverse Impacts of Flow Regulation on Riparian Vegetation","authors":"Xiaolei Su,&nbsp;María Dolores Bejarano,&nbsp;Roland Jansson,&nbsp;Francesca Pilotto,&nbsp;Judith M. Sarneel,&nbsp;Feng Lin,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Fu Cai,&nbsp;Shan Wu,&nbsp;Bo Zeng","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Over two-thirds of global rivers are subjected to flow regulation. Although it is widely recognized that flow regulation can adversely affect riparian vegetation—a critical component of river ecosystems—the specific roles of various drivers remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted a broad-scale meta-analysis, aiming to elucidate how different factors mediate the adverse impacts of flow regulation on riparian vegetation. This meta-analysis encompassed 59 papers, spanning 278 dams constructed on 146 rivers. We extracted data on four key indices of riparian vegetation: species richness and abundance of all riparian species, and those indices exclusively for non-native species. Indices were compared between regulated and free-flowing or pre-damming rivers to quantify the impact of flow regulation. Our meta-analysis revealed a moderate but significant reduction in the richness and abundance of all riparian species under flow regulation, coupled with a strong increase in the abundance of non-native species. Riparian vegetation in arid and continental climate regions experienced stronger negative impacts than those in tropical and temperate climates. Furthermore, the adverse effects on riparian vegetation were more pronounced downstream of dams than upstream. Considering climate region, study identity, and relative position to the dam as random variables, it became evident that years since flow regulation emerged as the most important factor influencing species richness. Over time, richness gradually recovered from initially low levels. However, this recovery was slowed by increasing flow regulation intensity (percentage of annual runoff stored). Additionally, the impact was more evident in larger rivers. To support regulated river management, we recommend prioritizing the protection of riparian vegetation in arid and continental climates, with emphasis on areas downstream of dams, limiting flow regulation intensity, particularly in larger rivers, and monitoring non-native species to prevent disproportionate spread.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over two-thirds of global rivers are subjected to flow regulation. Although it is widely recognized that flow regulation can adversely affect riparian vegetation—a critical component of river ecosystems—the specific roles of various drivers remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted a broad-scale meta-analysis, aiming to elucidate how different factors mediate the adverse impacts of flow regulation on riparian vegetation. This meta-analysis encompassed 59 papers, spanning 278 dams constructed on 146 rivers. We extracted data on four key indices of riparian vegetation: species richness and abundance of all riparian species, and those indices exclusively for non-native species. Indices were compared between regulated and free-flowing or pre-damming rivers to quantify the impact of flow regulation. Our meta-analysis revealed a moderate but significant reduction in the richness and abundance of all riparian species under flow regulation, coupled with a strong increase in the abundance of non-native species. Riparian vegetation in arid and continental climate regions experienced stronger negative impacts than those in tropical and temperate climates. Furthermore, the adverse effects on riparian vegetation were more pronounced downstream of dams than upstream. Considering climate region, study identity, and relative position to the dam as random variables, it became evident that years since flow regulation emerged as the most important factor influencing species richness. Over time, richness gradually recovered from initially low levels. However, this recovery was slowed by increasing flow regulation intensity (percentage of annual runoff stored). Additionally, the impact was more evident in larger rivers. To support regulated river management, we recommend prioritizing the protection of riparian vegetation in arid and continental climates, with emphasis on areas downstream of dams, limiting flow regulation intensity, particularly in larger rivers, and monitoring non-native species to prevent disproportionate spread.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
径流调节对河岸植被不利影响的大尺度meta分析
全球超过三分之二的河流都受到流量管制。尽管人们普遍认识到流量调节会对河岸植被(河流生态系统的重要组成部分)产生不利影响,但人们对各种驱动因素的具体作用仍然知之甚少。为了解决这一空白,我们进行了大规模的荟萃分析,旨在阐明不同因素如何介导流量调节对河岸植被的不利影响。这项荟萃分析包含了59篇论文,涵盖了146条河流上的278座水坝。我们提取了河岸植被的物种丰富度、所有河岸物种的丰度以及非本地物种的4个关键指数数据。比较了调节和自由流动或预筑坝的河流的指数,以量化流量调节的影响。我们的荟萃分析显示,在流量调节下,所有河岸物种的丰富度和丰度都有适度但显著的减少,而非本地物种的丰度则有明显的增加。干旱和大陆性气候区对河岸植被的负面影响大于热带和温带气候区。此外,大坝下游对河岸植被的不利影响比上游更为明显。将气候区域、研究对象身份和与大坝的相对位置作为随机变量考虑,水流调节时间成为影响物种丰富度的最重要因素。随着时间的推移,丰富度逐渐从最初的低水平恢复。然而,增加流量调节强度(年径流量储存的百分比)会减缓这种恢复。此外,这种影响在较大的河流中更为明显。为了支持规范的河流管理,我们建议优先保护干旱和大陆性气候下的河岸植被,重点是水坝下游地区,限制流量调节强度,特别是在较大的河流中,并监测非本地物种以防止不成比例的扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
Why Biodiversity Loss Matters More in a Stressful World. HomoTherm: An Open-Source Approach to Modelling Heat Exchange in Humans and Other Hominins in Diverse Environments. Global Phosphorus Enrichment Reshapes Terrestrial Phosphorus Cycling. Frequent Dry-Hot Extremes Slow the Loss of Semi-Arid Ecosystem Resilience. Respiration-Induced Weakening of Land Sink Contributed to the Largest CO2 Increase in 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1