CleanAI: Deep neural network model quality evaluation tool

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING SoftwareX Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.softx.2024.102015
Osman Caglar , Cem Baglum , Ugur Yayan
{"title":"CleanAI: Deep neural network model quality evaluation tool","authors":"Osman Caglar ,&nbsp;Cem Baglum ,&nbsp;Ugur Yayan","doi":"10.1016/j.softx.2024.102015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing deployment of AI systems in high-risk environments, along with the increasing necessity of integrating AI into portable devices, emphasizes the need to rigorously assess their quality and reliability. Existing tools for analyzing Deep Neural Network (DNN) models' strength, safety, and quality are limited. CleanAI addresses this gap, serving as an advanced testing system to evaluate the robustness, quality, and dependability of DNN models. It incorporates eleven coverage testing methods, providing developers with insights into DNN quality, enabling analysis of model performance, and generating comprehensive output reports. This study compares various ResNet models using activation metrics, boundary metrics, and interaction metrics, revealing qualitative differences. This comparative analysis informs developers, setting a critical benchmark to tailor AI solutions adhering to stringent quality standards. Ultimately, it encourages reconsideration of model complexity and memory footprint for optimized designs, enhancing overall performance and efficiency. Additionally, by simplifying models and reducing their size, CleanAI facilitates the acceleration of AI models, resulting in significant time and cost savings. The findings from the comparative analysis also demonstrate the potential for substantial optimization in model complexity and size. By leveraging CleanAI's comprehensive coverage metrics, developers can identify areas for refinement, leading to streamlined models with reduced memory requirements. This approach not only enhances computational efficiency but also supports the growing demand for lightweight AI systems suitable for deployment on portable devices. CleanAI's role in bridging the gap between robustness and efficiency makes it a crucial tool for advancing AI development while maintaining high standards of quality and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21905,"journal":{"name":"SoftwareX","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 102015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SoftwareX","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352711024003856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing deployment of AI systems in high-risk environments, along with the increasing necessity of integrating AI into portable devices, emphasizes the need to rigorously assess their quality and reliability. Existing tools for analyzing Deep Neural Network (DNN) models' strength, safety, and quality are limited. CleanAI addresses this gap, serving as an advanced testing system to evaluate the robustness, quality, and dependability of DNN models. It incorporates eleven coverage testing methods, providing developers with insights into DNN quality, enabling analysis of model performance, and generating comprehensive output reports. This study compares various ResNet models using activation metrics, boundary metrics, and interaction metrics, revealing qualitative differences. This comparative analysis informs developers, setting a critical benchmark to tailor AI solutions adhering to stringent quality standards. Ultimately, it encourages reconsideration of model complexity and memory footprint for optimized designs, enhancing overall performance and efficiency. Additionally, by simplifying models and reducing their size, CleanAI facilitates the acceleration of AI models, resulting in significant time and cost savings. The findings from the comparative analysis also demonstrate the potential for substantial optimization in model complexity and size. By leveraging CleanAI's comprehensive coverage metrics, developers can identify areas for refinement, leading to streamlined models with reduced memory requirements. This approach not only enhances computational efficiency but also supports the growing demand for lightweight AI systems suitable for deployment on portable devices. CleanAI's role in bridging the gap between robustness and efficiency makes it a crucial tool for advancing AI development while maintaining high standards of quality and reliability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CleanAI:深度神经网络模型质量评价工具
在高风险环境中越来越多地部署人工智能系统,以及将人工智能集成到便携式设备中的必要性日益增加,强调了严格评估其质量和可靠性的必要性。现有的分析深度神经网络(DNN)模型的强度、安全性和质量的工具是有限的。CleanAI解决了这一问题,作为一种先进的测试系统,可以评估深度神经网络模型的鲁棒性、质量和可靠性。它结合了11种覆盖测试方法,为开发人员提供对DNN质量的洞察,支持模型性能的分析,并生成全面的输出报告。本研究使用激活指标、边界指标和交互指标比较了各种ResNet模型,揭示了质的差异。这种比较分析告知开发人员,设置一个关键的基准,以定制符合严格质量标准的AI解决方案。最终,它鼓励重新考虑优化设计的模型复杂性和内存占用,从而提高整体性能和效率。此外,通过简化模型和减小其尺寸,CleanAI促进了人工智能模型的加速,从而节省了大量的时间和成本。对比分析的结果还表明,在模型复杂性和大小方面有很大的优化潜力。通过利用CleanAI的全面覆盖指标,开发人员可以确定需要改进的领域,从而减少内存需求的流线型模型。这种方法不仅提高了计算效率,而且还支持了对适合部署在便携式设备上的轻量级人工智能系统日益增长的需求。CleanAI在弥合鲁棒性和效率之间的差距方面的作用,使其成为推进人工智能发展的重要工具,同时保持高标准的质量和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SoftwareX
SoftwareX COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: SoftwareX aims to acknowledge the impact of software on today''s research practice, and on new scientific discoveries in almost all research domains. SoftwareX also aims to stress the importance of the software developers who are, in part, responsible for this impact. To this end, SoftwareX aims to support publication of research software in such a way that: The software is given a stamp of scientific relevance, and provided with a peer-reviewed recognition of scientific impact; The software developers are given the credits they deserve; The software is citable, allowing traditional metrics of scientific excellence to apply; The academic career paths of software developers are supported rather than hindered; The software is publicly available for inspection, validation, and re-use. Above all, SoftwareX aims to inform researchers about software applications, tools and libraries with a (proven) potential to impact the process of scientific discovery in various domains. The journal is multidisciplinary and accepts submissions from within and across subject domains such as those represented within the broad thematic areas below: Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Environmental Sciences; Medical and Biological Sciences; Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. Originating from these broad thematic areas, the journal also welcomes submissions of software that works in cross cutting thematic areas, such as citizen science, cybersecurity, digital economy, energy, global resource stewardship, health and wellbeing, etcetera. SoftwareX specifically aims to accept submissions representing domain-independent software that may impact more than one research domain.
期刊最新文献
TALL: Text analysis for all–an interactive R-shiny application for exploring, modeling, and visualizing textual data Version 0.2.0 – TreeEyed: A QGIS plugin for tree monitoring in silvopastoral systems using state of the art AI models YOLIC labeling: A semi-automated image annotation tool with segment anything model for cell-wise labeling CMRI Insight: A GUI-based open-source tool for cardiac MRI segmentation and motion tracking application Version 6.1.25 - AI-KM: An integrated platform for knowledge management and agent workflow orchestration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1