Investigating the effects of perforated inlet baffles in a circular sedimentation tank using Computational fluid dynamics

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Chemical Engineering Research & Design Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2025.01.027
Kirpa Hirom, Thiyam Tamphasana Devi
{"title":"Investigating the effects of perforated inlet baffles in a circular sedimentation tank using Computational fluid dynamics","authors":"Kirpa Hirom,&nbsp;Thiyam Tamphasana Devi","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A full-scale three-dimensional numerical study on the effects of using perforated inlet baffles in a circular sedimentation tank was performed using a numerical model that was validated with experimental data. A total of 14 cases were investigated in this study — 7 geometries and two influent concentration groups. A two-phase steady-state simulation was performed for each case using the Eulerian multiphase model coupled with the k-ω SST turbulence model. The simulation results are then analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. For the quantitative analysis, the weighted total settling efficiency is calculated after calculating the settling efficiency for each of the three particle sizes using the sediment concentration at the outlet weir surface. Significant improvement in the settling efficiency was observed due to the introduction of the perforated inlet baffles. An average improvement of 20.7 % was achieved for the lower influent concentration group, while an average improvement of 9.6 % was achieved for the higher influent concentration group. For the qualitative analysis, three performance indicators were examined — volume fraction of sediments along a vertical line near the outlet weir, the contour of turbulence kinetic energy in the inlet region along with the contour of velocity magnitude, and three-dimensionally rendered volume fraction distribution of clarified water/sediments in the whole geometry. The best-performing sedimentation tank was found to be the one that is equipped with a perforated stilling well and a perforated McKinney baffle. A good agreement is observed between the findings from the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"215 ","pages":"Pages 135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876225000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A full-scale three-dimensional numerical study on the effects of using perforated inlet baffles in a circular sedimentation tank was performed using a numerical model that was validated with experimental data. A total of 14 cases were investigated in this study — 7 geometries and two influent concentration groups. A two-phase steady-state simulation was performed for each case using the Eulerian multiphase model coupled with the k-ω SST turbulence model. The simulation results are then analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. For the quantitative analysis, the weighted total settling efficiency is calculated after calculating the settling efficiency for each of the three particle sizes using the sediment concentration at the outlet weir surface. Significant improvement in the settling efficiency was observed due to the introduction of the perforated inlet baffles. An average improvement of 20.7 % was achieved for the lower influent concentration group, while an average improvement of 9.6 % was achieved for the higher influent concentration group. For the qualitative analysis, three performance indicators were examined — volume fraction of sediments along a vertical line near the outlet weir, the contour of turbulence kinetic energy in the inlet region along with the contour of velocity magnitude, and three-dimensionally rendered volume fraction distribution of clarified water/sediments in the whole geometry. The best-performing sedimentation tank was found to be the one that is equipped with a perforated stilling well and a perforated McKinney baffle. A good agreement is observed between the findings from the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Research & Design
Chemical Engineering Research & Design 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
623
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering. Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Inside Front Cover Contents Regeneration of saturated activated carbon by low-voltage arcing method: Insight from nature water treatment Antibacterial effect of ethyl-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids anions on forward osmosis membranes Effects of inlet water flow and potential aggregate breakage on the change of turbid particle size distribution during coagulation-sedimentation-filtration (CSF): Pilot-scale experimental and CFD-aided studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1