Improving carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance through harvested wood products use

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100757
Isabelle Ménard , Evelyne Thiffault , Michael Magnan , Werner A. Kurz , François Hébert , Jean-François Boucher
{"title":"Improving carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance through harvested wood products use","authors":"Isabelle Ménard ,&nbsp;Evelyne Thiffault ,&nbsp;Michael Magnan ,&nbsp;Werner A. Kurz ,&nbsp;François Hébert ,&nbsp;Jean-François Boucher","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Afforestation can mitigate climate change by creating new carbon sinks and increasing wood supply. However, climate change can impact the growth of trees in afforested areas and affect their characteristics, and the harvested wood products that can be manufactured from them. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the quality of the wood supply directed to primary processing is influenced by climate change and alters the carbon storage of wood products. A multi-model approach was used to estimate the carbon stocks in harvested biomass resulting from plantations of black spruce on open woodlands and hybrid poplar on abandoned farmlands in Québec (Canada) under a gradient of climate forcing projections. Results suggest that increased climate forcing negatively impacts the quality of the harvested wood product basket and influences the relative amount of lumber vs. pulpwood. However, according to our assumptions, the decay of solid wood products in landfills produced more methane emissions than paper, which may constrain their climate change mitigation potential in the absence of methane capture or flaring. The cascading use of solid wood products in bioenergy at the end of their service life significantly reduced overall emissions. This study highlights how comprehensive afforestation strategies can, in the long term, be used to maximize the carbon storage potential of harvested wood products sourced from new plantations, as long as these strategies also include better use of pulp-quality wood, improved cascading use at the end-of-life of wood products and, most importantly, the avoidance of methane emissions from landfilled wood.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Afforestation can mitigate climate change by creating new carbon sinks and increasing wood supply. However, climate change can impact the growth of trees in afforested areas and affect their characteristics, and the harvested wood products that can be manufactured from them. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the quality of the wood supply directed to primary processing is influenced by climate change and alters the carbon storage of wood products. A multi-model approach was used to estimate the carbon stocks in harvested biomass resulting from plantations of black spruce on open woodlands and hybrid poplar on abandoned farmlands in Québec (Canada) under a gradient of climate forcing projections. Results suggest that increased climate forcing negatively impacts the quality of the harvested wood product basket and influences the relative amount of lumber vs. pulpwood. However, according to our assumptions, the decay of solid wood products in landfills produced more methane emissions than paper, which may constrain their climate change mitigation potential in the absence of methane capture or flaring. The cascading use of solid wood products in bioenergy at the end of their service life significantly reduced overall emissions. This study highlights how comprehensive afforestation strategies can, in the long term, be used to maximize the carbon storage potential of harvested wood products sourced from new plantations, as long as these strategies also include better use of pulp-quality wood, improved cascading use at the end-of-life of wood products and, most importantly, the avoidance of methane emissions from landfilled wood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过采伐木材产品的使用改善碳储存和避免温室气体排放
植树造林可以通过创造新的碳汇和增加木材供应来减缓气候变化。然而,气候变化会影响造林地区树木的生长,影响它们的特性,以及可以用它们制造的采伐木材产品。本研究旨在量化用于初级加工的木材供应质量在多大程度上受到气候变化的影响,并改变木制品的碳储量。在气候强迫预测梯度下,采用多模型方法估算了加拿大曲海梅省开放林地黑云杉和废弃农田杂交杨树收获生物量的碳储量。结果表明,气候强迫的增加对采伐木材产品篮的质量产生负面影响,并影响木材与纸浆木材的相对数量。然而,根据我们的假设,垃圾填埋场中实木产品的腐烂比纸张产生更多的甲烷排放,这可能会在没有甲烷捕获或燃烧的情况下限制其减缓气候变化的潜力。实木产品在使用寿命结束时在生物能源中的级联使用显著减少了总排放量。这项研究强调,从长远来看,综合造林战略可以用来最大限度地发挥新种植园采伐木材产品的碳储存潜力,只要这些战略还包括更好地利用纸浆质量的木材,改善木材产品寿命结束时的级联使用,最重要的是,避免填埋木材的甲烷排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Multifunctional sustainability benefits of rubber agroforestry: Evidence from rubber–Alpinia oxyphylla systems in tropical China Fire, culture and conservation: an ethnographic study of charcoal production in agroforestry systems of the Sierra of Zongolica, Mexico Different urban densities, different tree cover densities: Evidence from multimodal data in VR-based experiments Potential for climate change mitigation in protected areas of the Brazilian Cerrado Does contracting for labor-intensive forestry work advance equity in the Pacific West, USA?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1