The coparenting experience of parents involved in supervised access: A systematic review of the literature

Kenza Samel, Léa Binaut, Evelyne Bouteyre
{"title":"The coparenting experience of parents involved in supervised access: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Kenza Samel,&nbsp;Léa Binaut,&nbsp;Evelyne Bouteyre","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the increasing number of separations resulting in one parent being awarded sole custody of the child, the loss or severing of contact with the other parent is frequent. In this context, several countries have set up a series of socio-judicial systems to ensure that this relationship is maintained through visits supervised by social workers and psychologists.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In this article, the authors present a synthesis of the international scientific literature on the coparenting experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents involved in supervised access measures.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search of French and English language articles was conducted using 3 data sources. A total of 20 publications were selected. 6 articles were finally included using the PRISMA method.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Four themes related to the coparenting experiences of parents involved in visitation programs were highlighted: 1) coparenting and the revival of marital conflict throughout the supervised visitation program; 2) a less conflictual coparental relationship during visitation; 3) a coparental relationship developed in the child's best interests; and 4) coparenting as a protective factor in child development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our approach allowed us to compare the experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents, whereas most research focuses only on the experiences of non-custodial parents. In a context where prevention and intervention research and programs for families affected by conflictual separations remain scarce, our science-based findings provide new avenues for support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019382500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the increasing number of separations resulting in one parent being awarded sole custody of the child, the loss or severing of contact with the other parent is frequent. In this context, several countries have set up a series of socio-judicial systems to ensure that this relationship is maintained through visits supervised by social workers and psychologists.

Objective

In this article, the authors present a synthesis of the international scientific literature on the coparenting experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents involved in supervised access measures.

Method

A systematic search of French and English language articles was conducted using 3 data sources. A total of 20 publications were selected. 6 articles were finally included using the PRISMA method.

Findings

Four themes related to the coparenting experiences of parents involved in visitation programs were highlighted: 1) coparenting and the revival of marital conflict throughout the supervised visitation program; 2) a less conflictual coparental relationship during visitation; 3) a coparental relationship developed in the child's best interests; and 4) coparenting as a protective factor in child development.

Conclusion

Our approach allowed us to compare the experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents, whereas most research focuses only on the experiences of non-custodial parents. In a context where prevention and intervention research and programs for families affected by conflictual separations remain scarce, our science-based findings provide new avenues for support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Child protection realities of detained juveniles in a Ghanaian correctional facility: A qualitative narrative Association between childhood sexual violence and low educational attainment among young people aged 18–24: Evidence from the 2018 Uganda violence against children survey “New cloth on an old garment” - Barriers in transforming and implementing foster care services from a developmental approach in South Africa Is ethical review a barrier to the publication of research on violence against women and children for low- and middle-income country researchers? Lay understanding and perceptions of child protection: Limited awareness of restorative principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1