The coparenting experience of parents involved in supervised access: A systematic review of the literature

Child Protection and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100097
Kenza Samel, Léa Binaut, Evelyne Bouteyre
{"title":"The coparenting experience of parents involved in supervised access: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Kenza Samel,&nbsp;Léa Binaut,&nbsp;Evelyne Bouteyre","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the increasing number of separations resulting in one parent being awarded sole custody of the child, the loss or severing of contact with the other parent is frequent. In this context, several countries have set up a series of socio-judicial systems to ensure that this relationship is maintained through visits supervised by social workers and psychologists.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In this article, the authors present a synthesis of the international scientific literature on the coparenting experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents involved in supervised access measures.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search of French and English language articles was conducted using 3 data sources. A total of 20 publications were selected. 6 articles were finally included using the PRISMA method.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Four themes related to the coparenting experiences of parents involved in visitation programs were highlighted: 1) coparenting and the revival of marital conflict throughout the supervised visitation program; 2) a less conflictual coparental relationship during visitation; 3) a coparental relationship developed in the child's best interests; and 4) coparenting as a protective factor in child development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our approach allowed us to compare the experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents, whereas most research focuses only on the experiences of non-custodial parents. In a context where prevention and intervention research and programs for families affected by conflictual separations remain scarce, our science-based findings provide new avenues for support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019382500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the increasing number of separations resulting in one parent being awarded sole custody of the child, the loss or severing of contact with the other parent is frequent. In this context, several countries have set up a series of socio-judicial systems to ensure that this relationship is maintained through visits supervised by social workers and psychologists.

Objective

In this article, the authors present a synthesis of the international scientific literature on the coparenting experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents involved in supervised access measures.

Method

A systematic search of French and English language articles was conducted using 3 data sources. A total of 20 publications were selected. 6 articles were finally included using the PRISMA method.

Findings

Four themes related to the coparenting experiences of parents involved in visitation programs were highlighted: 1) coparenting and the revival of marital conflict throughout the supervised visitation program; 2) a less conflictual coparental relationship during visitation; 3) a coparental relationship developed in the child's best interests; and 4) coparenting as a protective factor in child development.

Conclusion

Our approach allowed us to compare the experiences of both custodial and non-custodial parents, whereas most research focuses only on the experiences of non-custodial parents. In a context where prevention and intervention research and programs for families affected by conflictual separations remain scarce, our science-based findings provide new avenues for support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与监督访问的父母的育儿经验:文献的系统回顾
随着越来越多的离婚导致父母一方被授予对孩子的单独监护权,与另一方失去联系或断绝联系是经常发生的。在这方面,一些国家建立了一系列社会司法制度,以确保通过社会工作者和心理学家监督的探访维持这种关系。目的在本文中,作者综合了国际上有关监护父母和非监护父母参与监督探视措施的育儿经验的科学文献。方法采用3个数据源系统检索法文和英文文献。共有20份出版物入选。采用PRISMA方法最终纳入6篇文章。研究结果表明:参与探视项目的父母的父母教养经历涉及四个主题:1)在监督探视项目中,父母教养与婚姻冲突的复苏;2)探视期间父母关系冲突较少;3)以孩子的最大利益为出发点的父母关系;4)父母在儿童发展中的保护作用。结论:我们的方法使我们能够比较监护权和非监护权父母的经历,而大多数研究只关注非监护权父母的经历。在针对受冲突性分离影响的家庭的预防和干预研究和项目仍然稀缺的背景下,我们基于科学的研究结果为支持提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of pediatric cases presenting for concerns of abusive head trauma in Norway Ethical considerations for the use of administrative child welfare data in public health surveillance: A qualitative study Violence against children and youth in refugee settings in Ethiopia: prevalence and associated risk factors Social auxiliary workers and community-based child protection: A case study of orphaned children awaiting foster care placement Care of victims of sexual violence against minors by social and health professionals: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1