An open-source application for obtaining retrospective and prospective insights into overall hospital quality star ratings

Kenneth J. Locey, Brian D. Stein, Ryan Schipfer, Brittnie Dotson, Leslie Klemp
{"title":"An open-source application for obtaining retrospective and prospective insights into overall hospital quality star ratings","authors":"Kenneth J. Locey,&nbsp;Brian D. Stein,&nbsp;Ryan Schipfer,&nbsp;Brittnie Dotson,&nbsp;Leslie Klemp","doi":"10.1016/j.health.2024.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings (overall star ratings) are designed to assist healthcare consumers by summarizing dozens of hospital quality measures. These ratings are also used by hospitals to direct quality improvements and are often used in healthcare research. However, no analytical tools have been developed to provide insights into the data, measures, and scores of the overall star rating system. To this end, we developed a novel open-source application to provide retrospective insights, prospective estimates, and research-ready data. Users can 1) examine changes in hospital performance from 2021 onward, 2) recalculate overall star ratings based on hypothetical improvements, 3) download data for all hospitals included in the overall star rating system since 2021, and 4) obtain prospective estimates based on the overall star rating methodology and its data source (Care Compare). We demonstrate 99.6% accuracy when estimating overall star ratings six months prior to public release. Estimates of whether hospitals will retain their star rating are up to 90% accurate a year before public release. We discuss the use of our application in healthcare research and the potential for similar tools to be developed for other hospital rating and ranking systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73222,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277244252400073X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings (overall star ratings) are designed to assist healthcare consumers by summarizing dozens of hospital quality measures. These ratings are also used by hospitals to direct quality improvements and are often used in healthcare research. However, no analytical tools have been developed to provide insights into the data, measures, and scores of the overall star rating system. To this end, we developed a novel open-source application to provide retrospective insights, prospective estimates, and research-ready data. Users can 1) examine changes in hospital performance from 2021 onward, 2) recalculate overall star ratings based on hypothetical improvements, 3) download data for all hospitals included in the overall star rating system since 2021, and 4) obtain prospective estimates based on the overall star rating methodology and its data source (Care Compare). We demonstrate 99.6% accuracy when estimating overall star ratings six months prior to public release. Estimates of whether hospitals will retain their star rating are up to 90% accurate a year before public release. We discuss the use of our application in healthcare research and the potential for similar tools to be developed for other hospital rating and ranking systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个开源应用程序,用于获得回顾性和前瞻性的整体医院质量星级评级
总体医院质量星级评级(总体星级评级)旨在通过总结数十个医院质量指标来帮助医疗保健消费者。这些评级也被医院用来指导质量改进,并经常用于医疗保健研究。然而,还没有开发出分析工具来提供对整个星级评级系统的数据、测量和分数的见解。为此,我们开发了一个新颖的开源应用程序,以提供回顾性的见解、前瞻性的估计和研究就绪的数据。用户可以1)检查2021年以后医院绩效的变化,2)根据假设的改进重新计算总体星级,3)下载自2021年以来纳入整体星级评定系统的所有医院的数据,4)根据整体星级评定方法及其数据来源(Care Compare)获得前瞻性估计。我们在公开发布前6个月估计整体星级评级时的准确率达到99.6%。对医院能否保持其星级评级的估计在公布前一年准确率高达90%。我们讨论了我们的应用程序在医疗保健研究中的使用,以及为其他医院评级和排名系统开发类似工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation, Nursing and Health Professions (General)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
79 days
期刊最新文献
A hierarchical Bayesian approach for predictive analytics of depression severity in medical students An analytical evaluation of imputation methods for enhancing cardiac care data integrity An unsupervised learning approach to optimising tumour therapy through clinical data mining A Bayesian framework for enhancing health data accuracy in pooled cross-sectional analysis An automated analytics approach for diabetic retinopathy detection with ensemble deep learning models in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1