A preliminary comparison of the short cell phytoliths from Zea mays, Pennisetum glaucum, and Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor leaves

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES South African Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2024.12.017
Tanya Hattingh , Marion K. Bamford , Maria H. Schoeman
{"title":"A preliminary comparison of the short cell phytoliths from Zea mays, Pennisetum glaucum, and Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor leaves","authors":"Tanya Hattingh ,&nbsp;Marion K. Bamford ,&nbsp;Maria H. Schoeman","doi":"10.1016/j.sajb.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While numerous studies have investigated the phytoliths produced by maize (<em>Zea mays</em>), an exotic crop introduced into southern Africa during the Columbian exchange (1492–1800), our research has the potential to impact the field significantly. No previous study has been published on whether maize phytoliths can be differentiated from those created by wild and domesticated plants from southern Africa. This research is crucial in understanding whether maize phytoliths can be used as a proxy for crop usage at archaeological sites in southern Africa. In this paper, we present the results of our analysis of the leaf phytoliths of landraces/cultivars of African domesticates, specifically pearl millet (<em>Pennisetum glaucum</em>) and sorghum (<em>Sorghum bicolor</em> subsp. <em>bicolor</em>)<em>,</em> and exotic crops, namely maize<em>.</em> We explore the similarities, and differences between the short cell phytoliths produced by these crops and the wild southern African grasses closely related to them. Our data show that based on size, variant 1 cross phytoliths can be used to distinguish between maize, the African grain crops used by pre-colonial farming communities and the wild southern African grasses related to them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21919,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Botany","volume":"177 ","pages":"Pages 457-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629924007956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While numerous studies have investigated the phytoliths produced by maize (Zea mays), an exotic crop introduced into southern Africa during the Columbian exchange (1492–1800), our research has the potential to impact the field significantly. No previous study has been published on whether maize phytoliths can be differentiated from those created by wild and domesticated plants from southern Africa. This research is crucial in understanding whether maize phytoliths can be used as a proxy for crop usage at archaeological sites in southern Africa. In this paper, we present the results of our analysis of the leaf phytoliths of landraces/cultivars of African domesticates, specifically pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor), and exotic crops, namely maize. We explore the similarities, and differences between the short cell phytoliths produced by these crops and the wild southern African grasses closely related to them. Our data show that based on size, variant 1 cross phytoliths can be used to distinguish between maize, the African grain crops used by pre-colonial farming communities and the wild southern African grasses related to them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Botany
South African Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.70%
发文量
709
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Botany publishes original papers that deal with the classification, biodiversity, morphology, physiology, molecular biology, ecology, biotechnology, ethnobotany and other botanically related aspects of species that are of importance to southern Africa. Manuscripts dealing with significant new findings on other species of the world and general botanical principles will also be considered and are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Diversity and dynamics of southern African medicinal and ritual plant use Editorial Board A comparative analysis of the content of functional constituents and melanin inhibition efficacy in Portulaca oleracea L Exploring the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, and anticancer potential of Achillea millefolium extracts: In-vitro and in-silico investigation Ex situ conservation of Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume via in vitro regeneration using DKW medium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1