N2-fixing species benefit biomass production in agroforestry mixtures depending on spatial scale and plantation age but not in the mixed forestry system
{"title":"N2-fixing species benefit biomass production in agroforestry mixtures depending on spatial scale and plantation age but not in the mixed forestry system","authors":"Abdoulaye Ndiaye , Pierrick Priault , Erwin Dallé , Alexandre Laflotte , Nicolas Marron","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest plantations play a crucial role in addressing the growing demand for wood-based products and biomass for renewable energy. However, their expansion is often limited by competition with food crops. Agroforestry, which integrates trees within agricultural plots, and mixed forest plantations have emerged as promising ways to reconcile these needs, especially when they include nitrogen-fixing species. This study evaluates the performance of mixed forest and agroforestry plantations including nitrogen-fixing species, such as alder and alfalfa, compared to monocultures. Based on an experimental trial in northeastern France, we compared the biomass production, and its time course, for poplar (<em>Populus nigra</em> × <em>P. deltoides</em>) and alder (<em>Alnus glutinosa</em>) trees in monocultures to their biomass production when associated together in the same stand, and when associated to crops (poplar with alfalfa and alder with grass) at three different scales (tree, plantation, and cropping system). After nine years of growth, at the tree level, both poplar and alder biomass was higher in the agroforestry systems than in the forest mixture or the monocultures. However, at the plantation level, the wood yield of the poplars and alders did not significantly differ between the mixtures and the monocultures at the end of the rotation. At the cropping system level, the two agroforestry systems exhibited a Land Equivalent Ratio significantly superior to 1, indicating higher productivity in these systems compared to crop and tree monocultures. The two agroforestry systems including nitrogen fixators showed very promising results, while the poplar and alder association was disappointing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 122508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest plantations play a crucial role in addressing the growing demand for wood-based products and biomass for renewable energy. However, their expansion is often limited by competition with food crops. Agroforestry, which integrates trees within agricultural plots, and mixed forest plantations have emerged as promising ways to reconcile these needs, especially when they include nitrogen-fixing species. This study evaluates the performance of mixed forest and agroforestry plantations including nitrogen-fixing species, such as alder and alfalfa, compared to monocultures. Based on an experimental trial in northeastern France, we compared the biomass production, and its time course, for poplar (Populus nigra × P. deltoides) and alder (Alnus glutinosa) trees in monocultures to their biomass production when associated together in the same stand, and when associated to crops (poplar with alfalfa and alder with grass) at three different scales (tree, plantation, and cropping system). After nine years of growth, at the tree level, both poplar and alder biomass was higher in the agroforestry systems than in the forest mixture or the monocultures. However, at the plantation level, the wood yield of the poplars and alders did not significantly differ between the mixtures and the monocultures at the end of the rotation. At the cropping system level, the two agroforestry systems exhibited a Land Equivalent Ratio significantly superior to 1, indicating higher productivity in these systems compared to crop and tree monocultures. The two agroforestry systems including nitrogen fixators showed very promising results, while the poplar and alder association was disappointing.
人工林在解决对木质产品和可再生能源生物质日益增长的需求方面发挥着关键作用。然而,它们的扩张往往受到与粮食作物竞争的限制。农林业(将树木整合到农业地块中)和混交林人工林已经成为调和这些需求的有希望的方法,特别是当它们包括固氮物种时。本研究评估了混交林和农林业人工林与单一栽培相比,包括桤木和苜蓿等固氮物种的表现。基于在法国东北部进行的一项试验,我们比较了单一栽培下杨树(Populus nigra × P. deltoides)和桤木(Alnus glutinosa)树木在同一林分、与作物(杨树与苜蓿、桤木与草)在三种不同尺度(树木、人工林和耕作制度)下的生物量产量及其时间过程。生长9年后,在树木水平上,农林业系统中的杨树和桤木生物量均高于混交林或单一栽培。但在人工林水平上,混交林与单作杨、桤木的木材产量在轮作结束时差异不显著。在种植系统水平上,两种农林业系统的土地等效比显著优于1,表明与作物和树木单一栽培相比,这些系统的生产力更高。含固氮剂的两种农林业系统表现出很好的效果,而杨树和桤木的结合则令人失望。
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.