Organic matter evolution and microbial activity in a vineyard soil after four years of inter-row cover crop management

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Applied Soil Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105868
Arianna De Bernardi , Enrica Marini , Francesca Tagliabue , Gianluca Brunetti , Cristiano Casucci , Überson Boaretto Rossa , Oriana Silvestroni , Costantino Vischetti
{"title":"Organic matter evolution and microbial activity in a vineyard soil after four years of inter-row cover crop management","authors":"Arianna De Bernardi ,&nbsp;Enrica Marini ,&nbsp;Francesca Tagliabue ,&nbsp;Gianluca Brunetti ,&nbsp;Cristiano Casucci ,&nbsp;Überson Boaretto Rossa ,&nbsp;Oriana Silvestroni ,&nbsp;Costantino Vischetti","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conservation agriculture approaches are rarely applied to viticulture in central Italy due to some research gaps persisting in this sector that somehow reflect ineffective extension programs and activities. This work analysed the effects on soil health and fertility of two inter-row vineyard management strategies carried out for 4 consecutive years: an annual legume cover crop of Egyptian clover (<em>Trifolium alexandrinum</em> L.) and a permanent meadow with spontaneous species. The inter-rows of the two tested strategies were compared with an adjacent uncultivated soil that had been left untilled for 20 years (control soil). The short-term (4 years) impacts of these techniques on the different soil organic carbon forms and on the soil microbial activity were measured at two soil depths (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm). Soil analyses included total and extractable organic carbon, humic and fulvic acids, microbial biomass carbon, respiration and some enzyme tests. The final aim was to evaluate if four years of soil cover could enhance the stabilisation of the soil organic carbon stock and increase the growth and activity of soil microbial biomass.</div><div>The permanent meadow showed a topsoil organic carbon content significantly higher than the annual legume cover, and both management soils showed an organic carbon content higher than the control soil. The topsoil humic acid content of the annual legume cover was significantly higher than both the permanent meadow and control, indicating that legume management stored the soil organic carbon in a more stable form. The microbial biomass carbon and the soil respiration of the annual legume cover topsoil were significantly higher than those of the permanent meadow. Regarding the enzyme activities, β-glucosidase and the enzymes related to the nitrogen cycle were significantly higher in the two managements than in the control, while phosphatase activity was not influenced by the two managements.</div><div>The results indicate that soil cover in the inter-row of vineyard increases the stable form of soil organic carbon, with variations according to the type of cover adopted. Even the effects on soil microbial biomass growth and activity were positive, especially for the activities related to the carbon and nitrogen cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105868"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092913932500006X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation agriculture approaches are rarely applied to viticulture in central Italy due to some research gaps persisting in this sector that somehow reflect ineffective extension programs and activities. This work analysed the effects on soil health and fertility of two inter-row vineyard management strategies carried out for 4 consecutive years: an annual legume cover crop of Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) and a permanent meadow with spontaneous species. The inter-rows of the two tested strategies were compared with an adjacent uncultivated soil that had been left untilled for 20 years (control soil). The short-term (4 years) impacts of these techniques on the different soil organic carbon forms and on the soil microbial activity were measured at two soil depths (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm). Soil analyses included total and extractable organic carbon, humic and fulvic acids, microbial biomass carbon, respiration and some enzyme tests. The final aim was to evaluate if four years of soil cover could enhance the stabilisation of the soil organic carbon stock and increase the growth and activity of soil microbial biomass.
The permanent meadow showed a topsoil organic carbon content significantly higher than the annual legume cover, and both management soils showed an organic carbon content higher than the control soil. The topsoil humic acid content of the annual legume cover was significantly higher than both the permanent meadow and control, indicating that legume management stored the soil organic carbon in a more stable form. The microbial biomass carbon and the soil respiration of the annual legume cover topsoil were significantly higher than those of the permanent meadow. Regarding the enzyme activities, β-glucosidase and the enzymes related to the nitrogen cycle were significantly higher in the two managements than in the control, while phosphatase activity was not influenced by the two managements.
The results indicate that soil cover in the inter-row of vineyard increases the stable form of soil organic carbon, with variations according to the type of cover adopted. Even the effects on soil microbial biomass growth and activity were positive, especially for the activities related to the carbon and nitrogen cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行间覆盖作物管理四年后葡萄园土壤有机质演化与微生物活动
保护性农业方法很少应用于意大利中部的葡萄栽培,因为该部门的一些研究差距在某种程度上反映了无效的推广计划和活动。本研究分析了连续4年实施的两种行间葡萄园管理策略对土壤健康和肥力的影响:每年种植埃及三叶草(Trifolium alexandrinum L.)的豆科植物覆盖作物和具有自然物种的永久草甸。将两种测试策略的行间土壤与相邻的未开垦土壤(对照土壤)进行比较,该土壤已耕种20年。在0 ~ 20 cm和20 ~ 40 cm两个土层深度测量了这些技术对不同土壤有机碳形态和土壤微生物活性的短期(4年)影响。土壤分析包括总有机碳和可提取有机碳、腐殖酸和黄腐酸、微生物生物量碳、呼吸和一些酶测试。最终目的是评估4年的土壤覆盖是否可以增强土壤有机碳储量的稳定性,并增加土壤微生物生物量的生长和活性。永久草甸表层土壤有机碳含量显著高于豆科植物年复盖度,两种管理土壤有机碳含量均高于对照土壤。豆科植物覆盖区表层土壤腐殖酸含量显著高于永久草甸和对照,表明豆科植物管理使土壤有机碳以更稳定的形式储存。一年生豆科植物覆盖表层土壤微生物量碳和土壤呼吸显著高于永久草甸。在酶活性方面,两种处理的β-葡萄糖苷酶和氮循环相关酶活性均显著高于对照,而磷酸酶活性不受两种处理的影响。结果表明,葡萄园行间土壤覆盖增加了土壤有机碳的稳定形态,且随覆盖方式的不同而变化。甚至对土壤微生物生物量的生长和活性也有积极的影响,特别是与碳和氮循环有关的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Subsurface soil as a hotspot for iron-bound organic carbon loss driven by moisture and microorganisms during seasonal freeze-thaw period Methane emissions under vegetation succession regulated by soil conditions and microbes in Yellow River Delta wetlands Effects of crusted straw or biochar incorporation on mineral-associated organic carbon dynamics: The roles of multitrophic interaction network Microbially mediated mitigation of N2O and NH3 emissions under combined straw and organic fertilizer management in a wheat-maize rotation system Effects of vegetation restoration on soil carbon pool and carbon fixation capacity of cbbL-type bacteria in eroded areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1