Encouraging or inhibiting: Can analyst attention reduce corporate greenwashing behavior?

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2025.01.007
Mengzhi Zhang , Wenjian He
{"title":"Encouraging or inhibiting: Can analyst attention reduce corporate greenwashing behavior?","authors":"Mengzhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenjian He","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As an essential mechanism of corporate external governance, it is worth considering whether analyst attention can inhibit corporate greenwashing behavior. Based on the theoretical exploration of the mechanism of analyst attention on corporate greenwashing behavior, this paper, using the data of Chinese A-share non-financial listed companies, quantitatively finds that analyst attention does not inhibit but rather encourages corporate greenwashing. After a series of robustness tests, the baseline regression results remain consistent. The mechanism test reveals that analyst attention encourages greenwashing due to the information asymmetry, which creates short-term performance pressure. This pressure displaces investments in environmental governance, ultimately increasing the motivation for greenwashing, rather than being driven by collusion between the two parties. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that analyst attention contributes more significantly to corporate greenwashing behavior among non-state-owned firms and firms with a high shareholding ratio of short-term institutional investors. These findings offer valuable insights for developing analyst practices and promoting genuine corporate environmental responsibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 943-962"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an essential mechanism of corporate external governance, it is worth considering whether analyst attention can inhibit corporate greenwashing behavior. Based on the theoretical exploration of the mechanism of analyst attention on corporate greenwashing behavior, this paper, using the data of Chinese A-share non-financial listed companies, quantitatively finds that analyst attention does not inhibit but rather encourages corporate greenwashing. After a series of robustness tests, the baseline regression results remain consistent. The mechanism test reveals that analyst attention encourages greenwashing due to the information asymmetry, which creates short-term performance pressure. This pressure displaces investments in environmental governance, ultimately increasing the motivation for greenwashing, rather than being driven by collusion between the two parties. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that analyst attention contributes more significantly to corporate greenwashing behavior among non-state-owned firms and firms with a high shareholding ratio of short-term institutional investors. These findings offer valuable insights for developing analyst practices and promoting genuine corporate environmental responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励还是抑制:分析师的关注能减少企业的“漂绿”行为吗?
分析师关注作为公司外部治理的重要机制,是否能够抑制公司的“漂绿”行为值得思考。本文在对分析师关注对公司漂绿行为影响机制进行理论探索的基础上,利用中国a股非金融类上市公司的数据,定量地发现分析师关注对公司漂绿没有抑制作用,反而起到了促进作用。经过一系列稳健性检验,基线回归结果保持一致。机制检验表明,由于信息不对称,分析师关注助长了“洗绿”,造成短期业绩压力。这种压力取代了对环境治理的投资,最终增加了洗绿的动机,而不是由两党合谋驱动的。异质性分析表明,在非国有企业和短期机构投资者持股比例较高的企业中,分析师关注对企业洗绿行为的影响更为显著。这些发现为发展分析师实践和促进真正的企业环境责任提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the role of trade liberalization in technological innovation: Evidence from free trade zones in China Cloud computing adoption and pollution emissions: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms FinTech, bank proximity, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China Impact of early-life exposure of children to expanded road infrastructure on long-term educational attainment: New evidence from China Digital infrastructure and industrial decarbonization: evidence from the dual perspectives of green innovation and digital coordination in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1