Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Applied Soil Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105881
Nick van Eekeren , Jurre Dekker , Rob Geerts , Pedro Janssen , Anthonie Stip , Tim Visser , Jaap Bloem , Ron de Goede
{"title":"Disturbance from tillage is a dominant factor in explaining differences in soil biodiversity of three grasslands management types","authors":"Nick van Eekeren ,&nbsp;Jurre Dekker ,&nbsp;Rob Geerts ,&nbsp;Pedro Janssen ,&nbsp;Anthonie Stip ,&nbsp;Tim Visser ,&nbsp;Jaap Bloem ,&nbsp;Ron de Goede","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325000198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensification of agriculture has reduced both aboveground and belowground biodiversity, as well as their ecosystem services. A transition towards regenerative agricultural systems is supposed to enhance functional agro-biodiversity and create more resilient systems. For dairy or beef farming, extensification towards semi-natural grasslands and establishing multi-species grasslands are potential contributors to this transition. Both grassland types differ in terms of plant diversity and management, but it is unclear whether and how these differences translate into soil quality and soil biodiversity. An on-farm trial was set up in which the abundance and diversity of soil biota was compared between intensively managed species-poor permanent grasslands, intensively managed frequently re-seeded multi-species grasslands, and extensively managed species-rich semi-natural grasslands. Total abundance and biomass of nematodes, micro-arthropods and earthworms did not differ between these grassland types. Bacterial PLFA was higher in semi-natural grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; intensive-permanent grasslands took an intermediate position. Protozoan PLFA was higher in intensive-permanent grasslands than in multi-species grasslands; semi-natural grasslands took an intermediate position. The grassland management types only had an effect on alpha and gamma diversity in the case of micro-arthropods, with a higher taxonomic richness in semi-natural grasslands. Nematode, micro-arthropod and earthworm taxonomic community structures differed between grassland management types. Differences in abundance and diversity of soil biota between multi-species grasslands on the one hand and intensive-permanent and semi-natural grasslands on the other hand were thought to be mostly related to disturbances caused by tillage and their direct and indirect effects on soil biota and its living conditions. Consequently, longevity without regular soil disturbance is considered important for the transition to grassland systems such as multi-species grasslands that simultaneously utilise and support soil biodiversity and its ecosystem services. However, what must also be considered in decisions on the transition to future farming systems are the impacts on aboveground biodiversity (including insects and birds) and ecosystem services such as agricultural production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耕作干扰是解释三种草原经营类型土壤生物多样性差异的主要因素
农业集约化减少了地上和地下生物多样性及其生态系统服务。向可再生农业系统的过渡应该能增强功能性农业生物多样性,并创造更有弹性的系统。对于奶牛或牛肉养殖业,向半自然草地的扩展和建立多物种草地是这种转变的潜在贡献者。两种草地类型在植物多样性和管理方面存在差异,但这些差异是否以及如何转化为土壤质量和土壤生物多样性尚不清楚。建立了农田试验,比较了集约管理的物种贫乏的永久草地、集约管理的频繁复播的多物种草地和广泛管理的物种丰富的半自然草地土壤生物群的丰富度和多样性。线虫、微型节肢动物和蚯蚓的总丰度和生物量在不同草地类型间无显著差异。半自然草地的细菌PLFA高于多物种草地;密集的永久草原则处于中间位置。集约化永久草原的原生动物PLFA高于多物种草原;半天然草地处于中间位置。草地管理类型仅对微节肢动物的α和γ多样性有影响,半自然草地的丰富度更高。线虫、微节肢动物和蚯蚓的分类群落结构在不同的草地管理类型之间存在差异。多物种草地与集约永久草地和半自然草地土壤生物群丰度和多样性的差异主要与耕作干扰及其对土壤生物群及其生存条件的直接和间接影响有关。因此,没有定期土壤干扰的长寿被认为是向草地系统过渡的重要因素,如多物种草地,同时利用和支持土壤生物多样性及其生态系统服务。然而,在决定向未来农业系统过渡时,还必须考虑对地上生物多样性(包括昆虫和鸟类)和生态系统服务(如农业生产)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Biochar mediated microbial responses to organic contaminants in soil environments: From mechanisms to ecological implications Multiomics reveals microbial-metabolic rewiring in electrokinetic-enhanced phytoremediation of petroleum soil Long-term fertilization alters soil phosphorus pools and microbial P-cycling mechanisms across soil depths in acidic paddy soil Modulating soil enzyme functions: The role of aggregate structure in arsenic-contaminated soils under dry-flood cycle Plant domestication influences the distribution and host-location behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1