From ecological entities to the entire coastal zone: An improved ecological risk assessment methodology in Jiangsu, China

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107826
Jian Fang, Min Xu, Min Wu
{"title":"From ecological entities to the entire coastal zone: An improved ecological risk assessment methodology in Jiangsu, China","authors":"Jian Fang,&nbsp;Min Xu,&nbsp;Min Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal ecosystems face disturbances from multiple risk sources. However, few studies have explored how to overcome land–sea heterogeneity in complex coastal zones to quantify ecological risk (ER) and provide spatial insights into the driving mechanisms of ER in coastal zones. This study proposed an improved ecological risk assessment method based on an exposure–consequence framework from natural and anthropogenic risk sources to investigate spatiotemporal changes in the ER of ecological entities along the Jiangsu coastal zone from 2000 to 2022. The ER of ecological entities was fused to the entire coastal zone to realize the risk correlation between them and calculated ER of shore sections by carrying value. The explanatory power and spatial heterogeneity of the driving factors for coastal ER were determined using geographical detector (GeoDetector) and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) models. For ecological entities, the very low to low-risk of the nature reserves were transferred the most in 2000–2010 (516.7705km<sup>2</sup>). Very low-risk areas of along the entire coastal zone decreased by nearly 50 %; the lower and higher risks areas were transferred to each other due to natural risk. The main driving factors of ER were GDP, underlying surface type, and development intensity, with a tendency for high-impact areas to expand gradually over time. The explanatory power of socio-economic factors was greater than that of natural factors. This novel ecological risk assessment framework elucidates the patterns and drivers of ER in coastal zones and serves as a practical reference for developing effective risk prevention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 107826"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552500023X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems face disturbances from multiple risk sources. However, few studies have explored how to overcome land–sea heterogeneity in complex coastal zones to quantify ecological risk (ER) and provide spatial insights into the driving mechanisms of ER in coastal zones. This study proposed an improved ecological risk assessment method based on an exposure–consequence framework from natural and anthropogenic risk sources to investigate spatiotemporal changes in the ER of ecological entities along the Jiangsu coastal zone from 2000 to 2022. The ER of ecological entities was fused to the entire coastal zone to realize the risk correlation between them and calculated ER of shore sections by carrying value. The explanatory power and spatial heterogeneity of the driving factors for coastal ER were determined using geographical detector (GeoDetector) and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) models. For ecological entities, the very low to low-risk of the nature reserves were transferred the most in 2000–2010 (516.7705km2). Very low-risk areas of along the entire coastal zone decreased by nearly 50 %; the lower and higher risks areas were transferred to each other due to natural risk. The main driving factors of ER were GDP, underlying surface type, and development intensity, with a tendency for high-impact areas to expand gradually over time. The explanatory power of socio-economic factors was greater than that of natural factors. This novel ecological risk assessment framework elucidates the patterns and drivers of ER in coastal zones and serves as a practical reference for developing effective risk prevention strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从生态实体到整个海岸带:江苏生态风险评价方法的改进
沿海生态系统面临多种风险源的干扰。然而,如何克服复杂海岸带的陆海异质性,量化海岸带生态风险,为海岸带生态风险驱动机制提供空间视角的研究却很少。基于自然风险源和人为风险源的暴露-后果框架,提出了一种改进的生态风险评估方法,研究了2000 - 2022年江苏海岸带生态实体ER的时空变化。将生态实体的ER融合到整个海岸带,实现生态实体之间的风险关联,并通过承载值计算岸段的ER。利用地理探测器(GeoDetector)和多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)模型分析了沿海生态承载力驱动因子的解释力和空间异质性。2000-2010年,极低至低风险自然保护区转移最多(516.7705km2)。整个沿海地区的极低风险地区减少了近50%;由于自然风险的存在,低风险区和高风险区相互转移。GDP、下垫面类型和开发强度是影响生态承载力的主要因素,且随着时间的推移,高影响区域有逐渐扩大的趋势。社会经济因素的解释力大于自然因素。这一新的生态风险评估框架阐明了海岸带生态风险的模式和驱动因素,为制定有效的风险预防策略提供了实践参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Modeling the environmental benefits of recycling infrastructure demolition waste into recycled aggregate concrete bricks Integrating citizen science and machine learning to guide urban biodiversity planning: A case study of Belgium's top 10 urban regions Low-carbon innovation prediction: Identifying the key driving factors of different categories of low-carbon technological innovation in China Knowing when to stop: Threshold effects of human disturbance on ecosystem health in the Taihu Basin, China Comprehensive evaluation of regional sustainable development along the belt and road from production and consumption perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1