Assessment of environmental product declaration and databases: Towards ensuring data quality assurance practices

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107803
Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju, Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma, Michael Donn, Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi
{"title":"Assessment of environmental product declaration and databases: Towards ensuring data quality assurance practices","authors":"Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju,&nbsp;Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma,&nbsp;Michael Donn,&nbsp;Oluwatobi Nurudeen Oyefusi","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental product declaration (EPD) is a vital tool for sustainable decision-making. However, limited studies have considered electronic databases' importance in shaping EPD adoption's future. The rise in EPDs globally has raised concerns about data quality assurance issues. Therefore, assessing the current EPD and its databases is important to provide a robust pathway for ensuring data quality assurance practices. This study adopted a mixed research approach to address the concerns, including desk research, focus group discussion, and the use of natural language processing (NLP) for analysis of sample EPDs. The desk research includes data scrapping of EPD data from the ECO Platform and expert ranking agreement based on pre-defined attributes. The study revealed a need to improve the current EPD databases to enhance user experience and the structure of construction EPDs due to the poor association between EPDs published by different programme operators. It is also important to note that the top three EPD databases based on expert ranking agreement are: ECO Platform, EPD Norway, and EPD Ireland. The study proposed a conceptual framework and system architecture aimed at improving data quality assurance practices. The findings from this study have direct implications for EPD programme operators, manufacturers, EPD data users, and policy-makers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 107803"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003901","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental product declaration (EPD) is a vital tool for sustainable decision-making. However, limited studies have considered electronic databases' importance in shaping EPD adoption's future. The rise in EPDs globally has raised concerns about data quality assurance issues. Therefore, assessing the current EPD and its databases is important to provide a robust pathway for ensuring data quality assurance practices. This study adopted a mixed research approach to address the concerns, including desk research, focus group discussion, and the use of natural language processing (NLP) for analysis of sample EPDs. The desk research includes data scrapping of EPD data from the ECO Platform and expert ranking agreement based on pre-defined attributes. The study revealed a need to improve the current EPD databases to enhance user experience and the structure of construction EPDs due to the poor association between EPDs published by different programme operators. It is also important to note that the top three EPD databases based on expert ranking agreement are: ECO Platform, EPD Norway, and EPD Ireland. The study proposed a conceptual framework and system architecture aimed at improving data quality assurance practices. The findings from this study have direct implications for EPD programme operators, manufacturers, EPD data users, and policy-makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境产品声明和数据库的评估:确保数据质量保证实践
环境产品声明(EPD)是可持续决策的重要工具。然而,有限的研究已经考虑到电子数据库在塑造环境保护采用的未来方面的重要性。全球epd的增加引发了人们对数据质量保证问题的担忧。因此,评估当前的环保署及其数据库对于确保数据质量保证措施提供一个强有力的途径是非常重要的。本研究采用混合研究方法来解决这些问题,包括书桌研究、焦点小组讨论和使用自然语言处理(NLP)来分析样本epd。案头研究包括对来自ECO平台的EPD数据进行数据回收,以及基于预定义属性的专家排名协议。研究结果显示,由于不同计划营销商所发表的环境保护文件之间缺乏关联性,因此有需要改善现有的环境保护文件资料库,以改善使用者的体验和结构。同样值得注意的是,根据专家排名协议排名前三的EPD数据库是:ECO Platform, EPD Norway和EPD Ireland。该研究提出了一个概念性框架和系统架构,旨在改进数据质量保证实践。这项研究的结果对环保署计划的执行者、制造商、环保署数据使用者和政策制定者有直接的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Modeling the environmental benefits of recycling infrastructure demolition waste into recycled aggregate concrete bricks Integrating citizen science and machine learning to guide urban biodiversity planning: A case study of Belgium's top 10 urban regions Low-carbon innovation prediction: Identifying the key driving factors of different categories of low-carbon technological innovation in China Knowing when to stop: Threshold effects of human disturbance on ecosystem health in the Taihu Basin, China Comprehensive evaluation of regional sustainable development along the belt and road from production and consumption perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1