{"title":"Does land management scale influence farmers' utilization of straw resources? Empirical evidence from rural China","authors":"Jialan Zhang , Ruohan Zhang , Kuan Zhang , Dingde Xu , Yanbin Qi , Xin Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-resource utilization, such as burning straw, exacerbates the frequency of extreme climate events and presents significant obstacles to global sustainable development. Identifying methods to enhance straw resource utilization (SRU) is essential for achieving environmentally sustainable agricultural development and mitigating climate change. Large-scale land management has become a cornerstone of contemporary agriculture. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the influence of land management scale (LMS) on farmers' SRU behavior. Specifically, the mechanisms through which LMS impacts farmers' SRU remain unclear. Utilizing comprehensive survey data from rural revitalization efforts in China in 2020, this study employs an IV-Probit model to investigate the quantitative impact and mechanism of LMS on farmers' SRU. The findings indicate that: (1) LMS significantly enhances farmers' SRU behavior, with a one-unit increase in LMS correlating with a 3.90 % rise in the probability of farmers engaging in SRU. This conclusion holds true even after robustness testing. (2) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that LMS exerts a more pronounced influence on SRU among new-generation farmers, large-scale farmers, high-income farmers, pure farmers, and farmers in the southern region. (3) LMS enhances farmers’ SRU behavior by increasing their awareness of environmental protection and economic considerations. The mediating effects of environmental protection awareness and economic considerations on SRU behavior are 5.45 % and 7.82 %, respectively. These findings offer valuable theoretical guidance for refining and enhancing SRU practices in rural areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 107820"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-resource utilization, such as burning straw, exacerbates the frequency of extreme climate events and presents significant obstacles to global sustainable development. Identifying methods to enhance straw resource utilization (SRU) is essential for achieving environmentally sustainable agricultural development and mitigating climate change. Large-scale land management has become a cornerstone of contemporary agriculture. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the influence of land management scale (LMS) on farmers' SRU behavior. Specifically, the mechanisms through which LMS impacts farmers' SRU remain unclear. Utilizing comprehensive survey data from rural revitalization efforts in China in 2020, this study employs an IV-Probit model to investigate the quantitative impact and mechanism of LMS on farmers' SRU. The findings indicate that: (1) LMS significantly enhances farmers' SRU behavior, with a one-unit increase in LMS correlating with a 3.90 % rise in the probability of farmers engaging in SRU. This conclusion holds true even after robustness testing. (2) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that LMS exerts a more pronounced influence on SRU among new-generation farmers, large-scale farmers, high-income farmers, pure farmers, and farmers in the southern region. (3) LMS enhances farmers’ SRU behavior by increasing their awareness of environmental protection and economic considerations. The mediating effects of environmental protection awareness and economic considerations on SRU behavior are 5.45 % and 7.82 %, respectively. These findings offer valuable theoretical guidance for refining and enhancing SRU practices in rural areas.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.