Digital enterprise distribution and green total factor productivity: A spatial agglomeration perspective

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107832
Shoufu Yang , Yiming Chen , Hao Chen , Bin Ye , Shuai Shao
{"title":"Digital enterprise distribution and green total factor productivity: A spatial agglomeration perspective","authors":"Shoufu Yang ,&nbsp;Yiming Chen ,&nbsp;Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Bin Ye ,&nbsp;Shuai Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The digital economy and enterprise agglomeration are vital drivers of modern economic development, and improving green total factor productivity (GTFP) is a key path to sustainable growth. Prior research in this area isolates the effects of the digital economy and economic agglomeration on GTFP, and few studies have explored the agglomeration of digital enterprises. This paper constructs a unique micro-level geographic dataset containing 13,371,283 Chinese digital enterprises and uses a distance-based Duranton and Overman index to measure digital enterprise agglomeration (DEA) in 278 cities from 2007 to 2019. Based on agglomeration externalities and resource allocation theories, we examine the nonlinear and spatial relationship between DEA and GTFP by matching micro-level enterprise data with macro-level city data. We also identify the mechanism using spatial mediating effect models. We find that DEA has a positive “U-shaped” correlation with GTFP, and that DEA has spatial spillover effects on neighbouring GTFP. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that DEA's impact on GTFP varies greatly depending on the city's conditions. In addition, capital misallocation and green technology innovation act as mediators between DEA and GTFP, but labour misallocation does not. Accordingly, we contend that the government should reform the household registration, land, and social security systems to promote the circulation of digital talents across regions, releasing the digital agglomeration and spatial spillover effects of provincial capitals and sub-centre cities. Finally, DEA strategies and green transformation policies should be dynamically adjusted in combination with the local industrial base and digital development conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 107832"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital economy and enterprise agglomeration are vital drivers of modern economic development, and improving green total factor productivity (GTFP) is a key path to sustainable growth. Prior research in this area isolates the effects of the digital economy and economic agglomeration on GTFP, and few studies have explored the agglomeration of digital enterprises. This paper constructs a unique micro-level geographic dataset containing 13,371,283 Chinese digital enterprises and uses a distance-based Duranton and Overman index to measure digital enterprise agglomeration (DEA) in 278 cities from 2007 to 2019. Based on agglomeration externalities and resource allocation theories, we examine the nonlinear and spatial relationship between DEA and GTFP by matching micro-level enterprise data with macro-level city data. We also identify the mechanism using spatial mediating effect models. We find that DEA has a positive “U-shaped” correlation with GTFP, and that DEA has spatial spillover effects on neighbouring GTFP. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that DEA's impact on GTFP varies greatly depending on the city's conditions. In addition, capital misallocation and green technology innovation act as mediators between DEA and GTFP, but labour misallocation does not. Accordingly, we contend that the government should reform the household registration, land, and social security systems to promote the circulation of digital talents across regions, releasing the digital agglomeration and spatial spillover effects of provincial capitals and sub-centre cities. Finally, DEA strategies and green transformation policies should be dynamically adjusted in combination with the local industrial base and digital development conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Food security changes in Central Asia during 1992–2019 and potential assessment in different scenarios based on self-sufficiency Exploring policy support for efficiency improvement of wind power from an environmental perspective: Evidence from wind farms in Qinghai, China Environmental and economic life cycle sustainability assessment of reusable versus single-use anaesthetic face masks Impact assessment of green finance reforms on renewable energy development A living lab learning framework rooted in learning theories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1