Optimizing tree selection for planning cable yarding operations: a multi-objective modelling approach

IF 4.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122489
Francesco Sforza , Martin Ziesak , Emanuele Lingua , Michael Starke
{"title":"Optimizing tree selection for planning cable yarding operations: a multi-objective modelling approach","authors":"Francesco Sforza ,&nbsp;Martin Ziesak ,&nbsp;Emanuele Lingua ,&nbsp;Michael Starke","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When planning timber harvesting in mountainous areas, selecting the trees to extract is highly challenging. This is due to the need to consider both the forest management plan as well as feasibility aspects of the logging operation. Additionally, the choice using cable yarding systems in steep and difficult terrain increases the complexity and related costs of the harvesting process. The protective function of mountain forests against natural hazards adds another layer of consideration. Decision-makers must strike a balance between maintaining the protective function of the forest directly after cutting and on a long term, while maximizing the economic efficiency of the harvesting operation. In this study, we have developed an optimization model for tree selection using linear mixed programming. The model relies on high-resolution airborne laser scanning data to create a forest inventory through individual tree detection. Constituting the Pareto frontier, by optimizing two primary objectives, 15 optimal trade-off solutions could be identified when minimizing the harvesting area and maximizing the economic benefit of timber harvesting. Four of the solutions were identified, which maintain the maximum protective effect of the remaining forest, with a cumulative basal area ranging from 33.3 to 33.9 m²ha<sup>−1</sup>, while significantly reducing the economic loss from 17 % to 79.6 % when emphasizing the economic benefit maximization. Furthermore, the model presented four solutions that keep the protective effect above the minimum threshold (cumulative basal area &gt; 30 m²ha<sup>−1</sup>) while also resulting in positive economic benefits from harvesting. This model presents a method that integrates a multi-objective approach to decision making, considering the practical constraints of cable yarding technology in the process of tree selection in mountainous areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"578 ","pages":"Article 122489"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724008016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When planning timber harvesting in mountainous areas, selecting the trees to extract is highly challenging. This is due to the need to consider both the forest management plan as well as feasibility aspects of the logging operation. Additionally, the choice using cable yarding systems in steep and difficult terrain increases the complexity and related costs of the harvesting process. The protective function of mountain forests against natural hazards adds another layer of consideration. Decision-makers must strike a balance between maintaining the protective function of the forest directly after cutting and on a long term, while maximizing the economic efficiency of the harvesting operation. In this study, we have developed an optimization model for tree selection using linear mixed programming. The model relies on high-resolution airborne laser scanning data to create a forest inventory through individual tree detection. Constituting the Pareto frontier, by optimizing two primary objectives, 15 optimal trade-off solutions could be identified when minimizing the harvesting area and maximizing the economic benefit of timber harvesting. Four of the solutions were identified, which maintain the maximum protective effect of the remaining forest, with a cumulative basal area ranging from 33.3 to 33.9 m²ha−1, while significantly reducing the economic loss from 17 % to 79.6 % when emphasizing the economic benefit maximization. Furthermore, the model presented four solutions that keep the protective effect above the minimum threshold (cumulative basal area > 30 m²ha−1) while also resulting in positive economic benefits from harvesting. This model presents a method that integrates a multi-objective approach to decision making, considering the practical constraints of cable yarding technology in the process of tree selection in mountainous areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化树木选择规划电缆堆场作业:多目标建模方法
当计划在山区采伐木材时,选择要提取的树木是极具挑战性的。这是因为需要考虑森林管理计划以及伐木作业的可行性方面。此外,在陡峭和困难的地形中使用电缆堆码系统增加了采收过程的复杂性和相关成本。山林对自然灾害的保护功能增加了另一层考虑。决策者必须在砍伐后直接维持森林的保护功能和长期保持森林保护功能之间取得平衡,同时最大限度地提高采伐作业的经济效率。在本研究中,我们开发了一个使用线性混合规划的树选择优化模型。该模型依靠高分辨率的机载激光扫描数据,通过单个树木的检测来创建森林清单。构建帕累托边界,通过优化两个主要目标,可以在最小化采伐面积和最大化木材采伐的经济效益时确定15个最优权衡解决方案。结果表明,在保持剩余森林最大保护效果的条件下,累积基础面积为33.3 ~ 33.9 m²ha−1,在强调经济效益最大化的情况下,经济损失从17. %显著降低到79.6% %。此外,该模型还提出了使保护效果高于最小阈值(累积基底面积>;30 m²ha - 1),同时也带来了积极的经济效益。该模型综合考虑山区采伐过程中电缆分拣技术的实际约束,提出了一种多目标决策方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the dynamic impacts of tree, stand, and climatic factors on individual tree mortality using survival analysis Wood substrate and light availability shape microbial community composition, function, and interactions of downed logs in karst forests Spatial patterns and environmental associations of soil nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in China’s forests Ant pruning and weak tussock facilitation jointly shape planted sapling performance along an elevation gradient Functional trait filtering of aerial insectivorous forest bats in Amazonian cattle-dominated landscapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1