Aboveground biomass modeling using simulated Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) waveform LiDAR and forest inventories in Amazonian rainforests

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122491
Nadeem Fareed , Izaya Numata , Mark A. Cochrane , Sidney Novoa , Karis Tenneson , Antonio Willian Flores de Melo , Sonaira Souza da Silva , Marcus Vinicio Neves d’ Oliveira , Andrea Nicolau , Brian Zutta
{"title":"Aboveground biomass modeling using simulated Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) waveform LiDAR and forest inventories in Amazonian rainforests","authors":"Nadeem Fareed ,&nbsp;Izaya Numata ,&nbsp;Mark A. Cochrane ,&nbsp;Sidney Novoa ,&nbsp;Karis Tenneson ,&nbsp;Antonio Willian Flores de Melo ,&nbsp;Sonaira Souza da Silva ,&nbsp;Marcus Vinicio Neves d’ Oliveira ,&nbsp;Andrea Nicolau ,&nbsp;Brian Zutta","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission one of the objectives is to estimate global forest aboveground biomass (AGB) using full waveform (WF) LiDAR data. GEDI's relative height (RH) metrics, derived from vertical energy distributions, serve as key predictors in AGB modeling, with energy quantiles ranging from 0 % to 100 %. Despite extensive studies on RH metrics, the selection of optimal RH metrics for AGB estimation remains inconsistent, and using fewer metrics can result in a loss of vertical structural complexity. This study explores the potential of dense sampling of RH metrics (RH5 to RH100, in 5 % increments) to retain forest structural complexity, even across diverse forest regimes. Using noise-free simulated GEDI WF data, we developed machine learning models (Cubist, Random Forest, and XGBoost) to estimate AGB across 174 forest plots in the Brazilian Amazon. Results showed that dense RH sampling outperformed models using fewer recommended RH metrics. Our proposed suite of mean RH (mRH) metrics (R² = 0.71, RMSE = 65.88 Mg/ha, nRMSE = 0.36) – derived at plot level from an extensive suite of RH metrics (RH5 to RH100, in 5 % increments) at sub-plot level, and vertical mean RH (vmRH) RH metrics within the 20 % waveform vertical energy distribution (vmRH20, vmRH40, vmRH60, vmRH80, and vmRH100) approach showed similar performance, at the plot level of an average size of 50 m by 50 m. The single vmRH metrics versus plot-level AGB estimates – vmRH80 consistently gives the best results for all ML models and Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression with R² ranges from (0.65–0.68), RMSE (53.18 – 70.51) Mg/ha – highest RMSE reported for OLS regression. All model’s performances were comparable giving similar RMSE, nRMSE, and coefficient of determination (R²) for derivative RH metrics – mRH and vmRH – compared with the traditional approach of selective RH metrics at GEDI footprint level estimates. The trained model provided AGB estimates at 30 m resolution for entire ALS survey areas of sites (n = 174) in the Brazilian Legal Amazon (BLA) region. Overall, this approach retains GEDI waveform information effectively and offers a scalable solution for regional and potentially global AGB modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"578 ","pages":"Article 122491"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272400803X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission one of the objectives is to estimate global forest aboveground biomass (AGB) using full waveform (WF) LiDAR data. GEDI's relative height (RH) metrics, derived from vertical energy distributions, serve as key predictors in AGB modeling, with energy quantiles ranging from 0 % to 100 %. Despite extensive studies on RH metrics, the selection of optimal RH metrics for AGB estimation remains inconsistent, and using fewer metrics can result in a loss of vertical structural complexity. This study explores the potential of dense sampling of RH metrics (RH5 to RH100, in 5 % increments) to retain forest structural complexity, even across diverse forest regimes. Using noise-free simulated GEDI WF data, we developed machine learning models (Cubist, Random Forest, and XGBoost) to estimate AGB across 174 forest plots in the Brazilian Amazon. Results showed that dense RH sampling outperformed models using fewer recommended RH metrics. Our proposed suite of mean RH (mRH) metrics (R² = 0.71, RMSE = 65.88 Mg/ha, nRMSE = 0.36) – derived at plot level from an extensive suite of RH metrics (RH5 to RH100, in 5 % increments) at sub-plot level, and vertical mean RH (vmRH) RH metrics within the 20 % waveform vertical energy distribution (vmRH20, vmRH40, vmRH60, vmRH80, and vmRH100) approach showed similar performance, at the plot level of an average size of 50 m by 50 m. The single vmRH metrics versus plot-level AGB estimates – vmRH80 consistently gives the best results for all ML models and Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression with R² ranges from (0.65–0.68), RMSE (53.18 – 70.51) Mg/ha – highest RMSE reported for OLS regression. All model’s performances were comparable giving similar RMSE, nRMSE, and coefficient of determination (R²) for derivative RH metrics – mRH and vmRH – compared with the traditional approach of selective RH metrics at GEDI footprint level estimates. The trained model provided AGB estimates at 30 m resolution for entire ALS survey areas of sites (n = 174) in the Brazilian Legal Amazon (BLA) region. Overall, this approach retains GEDI waveform information effectively and offers a scalable solution for regional and potentially global AGB modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用模拟全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)波形激光雷达和亚马逊雨林森林清查进行地上生物量建模
NASA全球生态系统动态调查(GEDI)任务的目标之一是使用全波形(WF)激光雷达数据估计全球森林地上生物量(AGB)。GEDI的相对高度(RH)指标来自垂直能量分布,是AGB建模的关键预测指标,能量分位数范围为0 %至100 %。尽管对RH指标进行了广泛的研究,但用于AGB估计的最佳RH指标的选择仍然不一致,并且使用较少的指标可能导致垂直结构复杂性的损失。本研究探索了RH指标(RH5至RH100,以5 %的增量)密集采样的潜力,以保持森林结构的复杂性,即使在不同的森林制度中也是如此。利用无噪声模拟GEDI WF数据,我们开发了机器学习模型(Cubist、Random Forest和XGBoost)来估计巴西亚马逊174个森林样地的AGB。结果表明,密集的RH采样优于使用较少推荐的RH指标的模型。我们提出的平均RH (mRH)指标(R²= 0.71,RMSE = 65.88 Mg/ha, nRMSE = 0.36) -在地块水平上从子地块水平的广泛的RH指标(RH5至RH100,以5 %的增量)中导出,垂直平均RH (vmRH) RH指标在20% %的波形垂直能量分布(vmRH20, vmRH40, vmRH60, vmRH80和vmRH100)方法中显示出相似的性能,在平均面积为50 m × 50 m的地块水平上。单个vmRH指标与plot-level AGB估计- vmRH80一致地为所有ML模型和普通最小二乘(OLS)回归提供了最佳结果,R²范围为(0.65-0.68),RMSE (53.18 - 70.51) Mg/ha - OLS回归报告的最高RMSE。与传统的GEDI足迹水平估计的选择性RH指标方法相比,所有模型的性能都具有可比性,给出了相似的RMSE、nRMSE和衍生RH指标(mRH和vmRH)的决定系数(R²)。训练后的模型为巴西合法亚马逊(BLA)地区的整个ALS调查区域(n = 174)提供了30 m分辨率的AGB估计。总的来说,这种方法有效地保留了GEDI波形信息,并为区域和潜在的全局AGB建模提供了可扩展的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Forest age and mixed mycorrhizal strategies mediate functional diversity contributions to ecosystem stability Cessation of management for Phyllostachys edulis forests exacerbates soil microbial C limitation and expands particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon pools The paradox of attraction: Why push-and-pull doesn’t always work for spruce protection against bark beetles Responses of understory plant diversity to fire regimes in temperate forests Effects of different stand densities and pruning on timber volume and ecosystem carbon sink in subtropical secondary forests: A Case study from Zhejiang Province, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1