One glyphosate: Toxic dispossession and the agri-military regime in Colombia

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103288
Claudia Rivera Amarillo , Lorena Arias-Solano , Diana Ojeda , Sonia Serna Botero
{"title":"One glyphosate: Toxic dispossession and the agri-military regime in Colombia","authors":"Claudia Rivera Amarillo ,&nbsp;Lorena Arias-Solano ,&nbsp;Diana Ojeda ,&nbsp;Sonia Serna Botero","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glyphosate is the most widely used non-selective herbicide globally in terms of volume and land area. In Colombia, its use for military purposes within the so-called War on Drugs has been a contentious issue in political debate and social mobilization since the late 1990s, culminating in the suspension of aerial spraying in 2015 and its ban in 2022. Despite decades of evidence and denunciations from communities, organizations, and scientists regarding glyphosate's harmful effects on human health and ecological systems, its widespread use in both small- and large-scale agriculture has been largely overlooked in public debates and government policies. In this article, we identify and analyze how the convergence between military and agricultural uses of glyphosate has resulted in the toxic dispossession of rural communities in Colombia as part of a violent anti-campesino policy. We argue that this convergence has shaped an agri-military regime requiring critical examination and public discussion. Drawing on interviews with social leaders and scholars, as well as an analysis of legal, public policy, and media documents, we demonstrate how glyphosate has articulated a strategy of dispossession and violence targeting campesino, Black, and Indigenous communities in Colombia's recent history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glyphosate is the most widely used non-selective herbicide globally in terms of volume and land area. In Colombia, its use for military purposes within the so-called War on Drugs has been a contentious issue in political debate and social mobilization since the late 1990s, culminating in the suspension of aerial spraying in 2015 and its ban in 2022. Despite decades of evidence and denunciations from communities, organizations, and scientists regarding glyphosate's harmful effects on human health and ecological systems, its widespread use in both small- and large-scale agriculture has been largely overlooked in public debates and government policies. In this article, we identify and analyze how the convergence between military and agricultural uses of glyphosate has resulted in the toxic dispossession of rural communities in Colombia as part of a violent anti-campesino policy. We argue that this convergence has shaped an agri-military regime requiring critical examination and public discussion. Drawing on interviews with social leaders and scholars, as well as an analysis of legal, public policy, and media documents, we demonstrate how glyphosate has articulated a strategy of dispossession and violence targeting campesino, Black, and Indigenous communities in Colombia's recent history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个草甘膦:哥伦比亚的有毒剥夺和农业军事政权
草甘膦是全球使用量和土地面积最大的非选择性除草剂。在哥伦比亚,自20世纪90年代末以来,在所谓的“毒品战争”中,将其用于军事目的一直是政治辩论和社会动员中一个有争议的问题,最终导致2015年暂停空中喷洒,并于2022年禁止。尽管几十年来社区、组织和科学家都有证据和谴责草甘膦对人类健康和生态系统的有害影响,但其在小型和大型农业中的广泛使用在公共辩论和政府政策中基本上被忽视了。在本文中,我们确定并分析了草甘膦的军事和农业用途之间的融合如何导致哥伦比亚农村社区的有毒剥夺,这是暴力反农民政策的一部分。我们认为,这种融合形成了一种需要严格审查和公开讨论的农业-军事体制。通过对社会领袖和学者的采访,以及对法律、公共政策和媒体文件的分析,我们展示了在哥伦比亚近代史上,草甘膦是如何明确地表达了一种针对农民、黑人和土著社区的剥夺和暴力策略的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Spaces of private conservation: State effects and hierarchical autonomy in private wildlife conservation Troubling ‘Post-Neoliberalism’: Coalitional governance and contradiction in Chicago Dual use as a political technology of contemporary military violence Devolution, delegation, and digitisation: Accountability gaps in fragmented border regimes Which border matters most? An analysis of how different types of internal boundaries affect voting behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1