One glyphosate: Toxic dispossession and the agri-military regime in Colombia

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103288
Claudia Rivera Amarillo , Lorena Arias-Solano , Diana Ojeda , Sonia Serna Botero
{"title":"One glyphosate: Toxic dispossession and the agri-military regime in Colombia","authors":"Claudia Rivera Amarillo ,&nbsp;Lorena Arias-Solano ,&nbsp;Diana Ojeda ,&nbsp;Sonia Serna Botero","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glyphosate is the most widely used non-selective herbicide globally in terms of volume and land area. In Colombia, its use for military purposes within the so-called War on Drugs has been a contentious issue in political debate and social mobilization since the late 1990s, culminating in the suspension of aerial spraying in 2015 and its ban in 2022. Despite decades of evidence and denunciations from communities, organizations, and scientists regarding glyphosate's harmful effects on human health and ecological systems, its widespread use in both small- and large-scale agriculture has been largely overlooked in public debates and government policies. In this article, we identify and analyze how the convergence between military and agricultural uses of glyphosate has resulted in the toxic dispossession of rural communities in Colombia as part of a violent anti-campesino policy. We argue that this convergence has shaped an agri-military regime requiring critical examination and public discussion. Drawing on interviews with social leaders and scholars, as well as an analysis of legal, public policy, and media documents, we demonstrate how glyphosate has articulated a strategy of dispossession and violence targeting campesino, Black, and Indigenous communities in Colombia's recent history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glyphosate is the most widely used non-selective herbicide globally in terms of volume and land area. In Colombia, its use for military purposes within the so-called War on Drugs has been a contentious issue in political debate and social mobilization since the late 1990s, culminating in the suspension of aerial spraying in 2015 and its ban in 2022. Despite decades of evidence and denunciations from communities, organizations, and scientists regarding glyphosate's harmful effects on human health and ecological systems, its widespread use in both small- and large-scale agriculture has been largely overlooked in public debates and government policies. In this article, we identify and analyze how the convergence between military and agricultural uses of glyphosate has resulted in the toxic dispossession of rural communities in Colombia as part of a violent anti-campesino policy. We argue that this convergence has shaped an agri-military regime requiring critical examination and public discussion. Drawing on interviews with social leaders and scholars, as well as an analysis of legal, public policy, and media documents, we demonstrate how glyphosate has articulated a strategy of dispossession and violence targeting campesino, Black, and Indigenous communities in Colombia's recent history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
“Home has always been at the heart of our self-government”: Housing, home and Indigenous self-determination in Fort Good Hope, Canada Navigating political opportunity structures: Street traders’ associations and collective action in politically volatile urban environments One glyphosate: Toxic dispossession and the agri-military regime in Colombia Fast and slow violence and the survival work of the stateless: The case of the Vietnamese in Cambodia Technopolitics ‘from the ground’: Tracing ‘power’ grids and the expertise in Mekong geopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1