Climate and environmental impacts of green recovery: Evidence from the financial crisis

Karol Kempa, Ashish Tyagi
{"title":"Climate and environmental impacts of green recovery: Evidence from the financial crisis","authors":"Karol Kempa,&nbsp;Ashish Tyagi","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2024.100194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While main goal of stimulus packages is to boost economic activity after a crisis, they may also affect environmental outcomes. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether incorporating green components into such packages affects the environment and to identify whether any effects are only temporary or affect countries’ trajectories towards a sustainable low-carbon economy. We compile a panel dataset covering 27 OECD countries from 2000–2019 to analyse green recovery packages launched in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Based in this dataset, we can investigate both short- and long-term impacts of green recovery packages on the climate, i.e., mitigation investments and greenhouse gas emissions, and the earth’s biocapacity. Using fixed effects estimation, we find that higher shares of green recovery spending induce lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and a smaller ecological footprint of production. Employing a difference-in-differences framework, we provide evidence for a causal effect of recovery programmes dedicated to renewable energy on renewable energy investments. All these effects persist in the post-recovery periods. These findings stress that policymakers should consider the long-term impacts of post-crisis recovery programmes to ensure their consistency with the transition towards a sustainable climate-neutral economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While main goal of stimulus packages is to boost economic activity after a crisis, they may also affect environmental outcomes. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether incorporating green components into such packages affects the environment and to identify whether any effects are only temporary or affect countries’ trajectories towards a sustainable low-carbon economy. We compile a panel dataset covering 27 OECD countries from 2000–2019 to analyse green recovery packages launched in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Based in this dataset, we can investigate both short- and long-term impacts of green recovery packages on the climate, i.e., mitigation investments and greenhouse gas emissions, and the earth’s biocapacity. Using fixed effects estimation, we find that higher shares of green recovery spending induce lower CO2 emissions and a smaller ecological footprint of production. Employing a difference-in-differences framework, we provide evidence for a causal effect of recovery programmes dedicated to renewable energy on renewable energy investments. All these effects persist in the post-recovery periods. These findings stress that policymakers should consider the long-term impacts of post-crisis recovery programmes to ensure their consistency with the transition towards a sustainable climate-neutral economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the relative size of agricultural exports matter for sustainable development? Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa On income inequality and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh Impact of public climate change adaptation policies on women's employment and poverty in Burkina Faso Why the impasse? The large dams debate and divergent perspectives Farmers’ preferences toward organic certification scheme: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Northern Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1