Gendered energy consumption goes beyond sex: Applying a multi-dimensional gender framework to Swiss survey data

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103944
Iljana Schubert , Angela Hinel , Paul Burger
{"title":"Gendered energy consumption goes beyond sex: Applying a multi-dimensional gender framework to Swiss survey data","authors":"Iljana Schubert ,&nbsp;Angela Hinel ,&nbsp;Paul Burger","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research in the field of energy transition emphasizes that gender matters. However, gender is mainly included as a binary (male/female) category in survey-based research on individual energy consumption behaviour (ECB), ignoring socio-cultural and psychological dimensions of gender often found in the literature on ECB. This paper strives to overcome this mismatch and puts forward a novel multi-dimensional gender approach for survey-based ECB research. The approach is comprised of biological/self-ascribed sex, psychological (e.g. items based on BSRI scale) and socio-cultural factors (e.g., national employment stereotypes, social roles). We estimate regression models for two types of ECB (overall energy consumption and specific behaviours) in three main energy domains: electricity, heating and mobility. The dependent variables reflect a broad spectrum of ECB with varying scale types as proxies for the variety of measures in ECB research. For each ECB we compare a <em>sex only</em> model with <em>the multi-dimensional model.</em> All 12 models are estimated using data from 5011 participants from the Swiss Household Energy Demand Survey. Results show that different gender dimensions are relevant for distinct ECB. For example, psychological gender components with more feminine traits (e.g. affectionate, helpful) are linked to higher public transport use and active mobility and heating-related savings. More masculine traits (e.g. authority, leadership) are related to saving electricity through switching-off the TV. Binary sex only predicts differences in the mobility domain, possibly indicating an overestimation of (binary) sex in previous studies. Hence, the paper provides strong evidence for applying a multi-dimensional gender approach in future ECB research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103944"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research in the field of energy transition emphasizes that gender matters. However, gender is mainly included as a binary (male/female) category in survey-based research on individual energy consumption behaviour (ECB), ignoring socio-cultural and psychological dimensions of gender often found in the literature on ECB. This paper strives to overcome this mismatch and puts forward a novel multi-dimensional gender approach for survey-based ECB research. The approach is comprised of biological/self-ascribed sex, psychological (e.g. items based on BSRI scale) and socio-cultural factors (e.g., national employment stereotypes, social roles). We estimate regression models for two types of ECB (overall energy consumption and specific behaviours) in three main energy domains: electricity, heating and mobility. The dependent variables reflect a broad spectrum of ECB with varying scale types as proxies for the variety of measures in ECB research. For each ECB we compare a sex only model with the multi-dimensional model. All 12 models are estimated using data from 5011 participants from the Swiss Household Energy Demand Survey. Results show that different gender dimensions are relevant for distinct ECB. For example, psychological gender components with more feminine traits (e.g. affectionate, helpful) are linked to higher public transport use and active mobility and heating-related savings. More masculine traits (e.g. authority, leadership) are related to saving electricity through switching-off the TV. Binary sex only predicts differences in the mobility domain, possibly indicating an overestimation of (binary) sex in previous studies. Hence, the paper provides strong evidence for applying a multi-dimensional gender approach in future ECB research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源消费的性别化超越性别:多维性别框架在瑞士调查数据中的应用
最近在能源转型领域的研究强调性别很重要。然而,在基于调查的个人能源消费行为(ECB)研究中,性别主要被视为二元(男性/女性)类别,忽略了关于ECB的文献中经常发现的性别的社会文化和心理层面。本文努力克服这种不匹配,并提出了一种新的多维性别方法,用于基于调查的欧洲央行研究。该方法包括生物/自我认定的性别、心理因素(如基于BSRI量表的项目)和社会文化因素(如国家就业定型观念、社会角色)。我们估计了三个主要能源领域(电力、供暖和交通)中两种类型的欧洲央行(总体能源消耗和特定行为)的回归模型。因变量反映了欧洲央行的广泛范围,不同的规模类型作为欧洲央行研究中各种措施的代理。对于每个ECB,我们将仅性别模型与多维模型进行比较。所有12个模型都是根据瑞士家庭能源需求调查的5011名参与者的数据进行估计的。结果表明,不同的性别维度与不同的ECB相关。例如,具有更多女性特征的心理性别成分(例如,深情,乐于助人)与更高的公共交通使用和积极的流动性以及与供暖相关的储蓄有关。更多的男性特征(如权威、领导能力)与关掉电视省电有关。二元性别只能预测移动性领域的差异,这可能表明以前的研究对(二元)性别的高估。因此,本文为在未来的欧洲央行研究中应用多维性别方法提供了强有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy Towards a common intervention framework: A taxonomy of theory and techniques for digital energy behaviour change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1