Collaboration or Encroachment? The Content Provider’s Strategic Content Provision Strategy

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101470
Siyu Du, Xu Wang
{"title":"Collaboration or Encroachment? The Content Provider’s Strategic Content Provision Strategy","authors":"Siyu Du,&nbsp;Xu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid growth of the streaming industry, an increasing number of Super Content Providers (SCPs), such as Disney, Warner Bros., and NBC Universal, have launched their own streaming platforms, entering the downstream streaming market. However, some content providers, like Sony, still collaborate with Netflix. Therefore, this paper employs game theory to investigate the optimal content provision strategy for SCPs: collaboration or encroachment. We derive some interesting findings. First, contrary to intuition, we find that whether under the collaboration or encroachment strategy, improving the quality of a player’s own film library (the SCP or the incumbent platform) does not always result in higher profit for that player (first hurts then benefits the player). Second, for both the platform and the SCP, an increase in the scale of their film libraries does not automatically lead to higher profits. Third, when the revenue share is positively correlated with the scale of the film library, a small-scale library strengthens the motivation to encroach; conversely, when the library scale does not influence the revenue share, a large-scale library increases the motivation to encroach. Lastly, while the encroachment strategy can be a win–win situation for the incumbent platform and the SCP, it hurts consumer surplus. In contrast, the collaboration strategy can achieve a win–win–win situation under some conditions. Our study helps to explain the market practices and provides valuable guidelines for SCPs’ content provision strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324001157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid growth of the streaming industry, an increasing number of Super Content Providers (SCPs), such as Disney, Warner Bros., and NBC Universal, have launched their own streaming platforms, entering the downstream streaming market. However, some content providers, like Sony, still collaborate with Netflix. Therefore, this paper employs game theory to investigate the optimal content provision strategy for SCPs: collaboration or encroachment. We derive some interesting findings. First, contrary to intuition, we find that whether under the collaboration or encroachment strategy, improving the quality of a player’s own film library (the SCP or the incumbent platform) does not always result in higher profit for that player (first hurts then benefits the player). Second, for both the platform and the SCP, an increase in the scale of their film libraries does not automatically lead to higher profits. Third, when the revenue share is positively correlated with the scale of the film library, a small-scale library strengthens the motivation to encroach; conversely, when the library scale does not influence the revenue share, a large-scale library increases the motivation to encroach. Lastly, while the encroachment strategy can be a win–win situation for the incumbent platform and the SCP, it hurts consumer surplus. In contrast, the collaboration strategy can achieve a win–win–win situation under some conditions. Our study helps to explain the market practices and provides valuable guidelines for SCPs’ content provision strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Sharing economy and quality competition among traditional service providers Apologizing with a smile or crying face? Exploring the impact of emoji types on customer forgiveness within chatbots service recovery Comprehensive examination of the bright and dark sides of generative AI services: A mixed-methods approach Circular economy in post consumption network: The role of re-commerce groups in social media platforms Trust as the catalyst: Transforming perceived to created value in blockchain traceability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1