Load-shifting for cost, carbon, and grid benefits: A model-driven adaptive survey with German and Swiss households

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103931
Matteo Barsanti , Jan Sören Schwarz , Faten Ghali , Selin Yilmaz , Sebastian Lehnhoff , Claudia R. Binder
{"title":"Load-shifting for cost, carbon, and grid benefits: A model-driven adaptive survey with German and Swiss households","authors":"Matteo Barsanti ,&nbsp;Jan Sören Schwarz ,&nbsp;Faten Ghali ,&nbsp;Selin Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Sebastian Lehnhoff ,&nbsp;Claudia R. Binder","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Survey data helps understand user energy behaviour and inform policies supporting the transition to a renewable, user-centric electricity grid. To explore user responses to dynamic, hypothetical energy scenarios – such as time-varying electricity tariffs or fluctuations in renewable energy availability – surveys often rely on standardised fixed-choice questions. However, these methods frequently oversimplify the complexity, diversity, and temporal dynamics of user behaviour, resulting in generalised and incomplete insights for interventions.</div><div>To address these challenges, we introduce a model-driven adaptive survey. By integrating a conventional survey design with a feedback loop between participant responses and an energy demand model, this method allows end-users to iteratively evaluate and adjust their choices through a set of indicator scores. We implemented this approach in a survey conducted across Germany and German-speaking Switzerland (N=803), investigating user willingness to time-shift dishwashing usage under four scenarios: time-of-use tariffs, congestion risks, renewable energy availability, and their combinations.</div><div>Our findings highlight the value of integrating energy demand models into survey designs to assist respondents in making complex energy-related decisions in a tailored manner. Respondents exhibited significant variability in their load-shifting practices, with over 56% reporting a likelihood of time-shifting energy use even without financial incentives. Participants using the feedback mechanism achieved notable improvements: 19% reduction in energy costs, 80% reduction in peak energy demand, and 9% increase in renewable energy usage on average for running the dishwasher. Beyond its utility for data collection, we discuss how this approach could extend to real-world applications, enabling users to navigate decision-making in increasingly dynamic energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103931"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500012X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survey data helps understand user energy behaviour and inform policies supporting the transition to a renewable, user-centric electricity grid. To explore user responses to dynamic, hypothetical energy scenarios – such as time-varying electricity tariffs or fluctuations in renewable energy availability – surveys often rely on standardised fixed-choice questions. However, these methods frequently oversimplify the complexity, diversity, and temporal dynamics of user behaviour, resulting in generalised and incomplete insights for interventions.
To address these challenges, we introduce a model-driven adaptive survey. By integrating a conventional survey design with a feedback loop between participant responses and an energy demand model, this method allows end-users to iteratively evaluate and adjust their choices through a set of indicator scores. We implemented this approach in a survey conducted across Germany and German-speaking Switzerland (N=803), investigating user willingness to time-shift dishwashing usage under four scenarios: time-of-use tariffs, congestion risks, renewable energy availability, and their combinations.
Our findings highlight the value of integrating energy demand models into survey designs to assist respondents in making complex energy-related decisions in a tailored manner. Respondents exhibited significant variability in their load-shifting practices, with over 56% reporting a likelihood of time-shifting energy use even without financial incentives. Participants using the feedback mechanism achieved notable improvements: 19% reduction in energy costs, 80% reduction in peak energy demand, and 9% increase in renewable energy usage on average for running the dishwasher. Beyond its utility for data collection, we discuss how this approach could extend to real-world applications, enabling users to navigate decision-making in increasingly dynamic energy systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成本、碳排放和电网效益的负荷转移:一项针对德国和瑞士家庭的模型驱动适应性调查
调查数据有助于了解用户的能源行为,并为支持向可再生、以用户为中心的电网过渡的政策提供信息。为了探索用户对动态的、假设的能源情景——例如时变电价或可再生能源供应的波动——的反应,调查通常依赖于标准化的固定选项问题。然而,这些方法往往过度简化了用户行为的复杂性、多样性和时间动态,导致对干预措施的笼统和不完整的见解。为了应对这些挑战,我们引入了一个模型驱动的自适应调查。通过将传统的调查设计与参与者的回答和能源需求模型之间的反馈循环相结合,该方法允许最终用户通过一组指标得分迭代地评估和调整他们的选择。我们在德国和瑞士德语区开展了一项调查(N=803),调查了用户在四种情况下的洗碗意愿:使用时间关税、拥堵风险、可再生能源的可用性及其组合。我们的研究结果强调了将能源需求模型整合到调查设计中的价值,以帮助受访者以量身定制的方式做出复杂的能源相关决策。受访者在负荷转移实践中表现出显著的可变性,超过56%的受访者表示,即使没有经济激励,也有可能进行时变能源使用。使用反馈机制的参与者取得了显著的改善:能源成本降低了19%,高峰能源需求降低了80%,运行洗碗机的可再生能源使用量平均增加了9%。除了数据收集的实用性之外,我们还讨论了这种方法如何扩展到现实世界的应用中,使用户能够在日益动态的能源系统中进行决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Beyond yes and no: Clustering public perceptions of wave energy on the West Coast of the United States Reclaiming the wind: Indigenous windmills in Iran and their lessons for renewable energy From tension to transformation in Dutch heat transitions: Leveraging time, transparency, and relationships “Might give some hope for the future”: Understanding young adults' support for offshore wind in coastal Australia Solving the puzzle of justice: How to bridge the normative and descriptive logics in energy justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1