Gimmick or genuineness? Exploring the antecedents of AI virtual streamers aversion in live-streaming commerce

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123981
Quan Xiao , Xia Li , Weiling Huang , Xing Zhang
{"title":"Gimmick or genuineness? Exploring the antecedents of AI virtual streamers aversion in live-streaming commerce","authors":"Quan Xiao ,&nbsp;Xia Li ,&nbsp;Weiling Huang ,&nbsp;Xing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI virtual streamers are emerging as a novel presence in live-streaming commerce. However, a considerable portion of consumers are still averse to these AI entities. While existing research predominantly emphasizes the positive impacts of AI virtual streamers, it often overlooks the factors contributing to consumer aversion. To address this critical yet underexplored gap, this study employs the antecedent-belief-consequence (ABC) framework to examine the determinants of consumer aversion to AI virtual streamers. Data collected from 402 consumers with a comprehensive understanding of AI virtual streamers was conducted using the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. The results validate the impact of two key antecedents (i.e., anthropomorphism and technophobia) on the consequences (AI virtual streamers aversion) and explore the underlying mechanism of beliefs through the reflexive stage (i.e., perceived unwarm and perceived incompetent) and the reflective stage (i.e., consumer resonance and disfluency). Additionally, multigroup analysis (MGA) based on self-construal indicates significant group differences, with interdependent (independent) consumers being more likely to exhibit aversion through the perceived unwarm (perceived incompetent) pathway. These findings contribute to the current body of research by clarifying the multi-stage and multi-dimensional processes through which technophobia and anthropomorphism drive AI virtual streamers aversion. Practitioners can leverage these insights to address the underlying causes of consumer aversion, thereby facilitating the integration of AI virtual streamers into live-streaming commerce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 123981"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI virtual streamers are emerging as a novel presence in live-streaming commerce. However, a considerable portion of consumers are still averse to these AI entities. While existing research predominantly emphasizes the positive impacts of AI virtual streamers, it often overlooks the factors contributing to consumer aversion. To address this critical yet underexplored gap, this study employs the antecedent-belief-consequence (ABC) framework to examine the determinants of consumer aversion to AI virtual streamers. Data collected from 402 consumers with a comprehensive understanding of AI virtual streamers was conducted using the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. The results validate the impact of two key antecedents (i.e., anthropomorphism and technophobia) on the consequences (AI virtual streamers aversion) and explore the underlying mechanism of beliefs through the reflexive stage (i.e., perceived unwarm and perceived incompetent) and the reflective stage (i.e., consumer resonance and disfluency). Additionally, multigroup analysis (MGA) based on self-construal indicates significant group differences, with interdependent (independent) consumers being more likely to exhibit aversion through the perceived unwarm (perceived incompetent) pathway. These findings contribute to the current body of research by clarifying the multi-stage and multi-dimensional processes through which technophobia and anthropomorphism drive AI virtual streamers aversion. Practitioners can leverage these insights to address the underlying causes of consumer aversion, thereby facilitating the integration of AI virtual streamers into live-streaming commerce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the forecasting of innovation diffusion: A combined actor- and system approach Dynamic optimization of e-commerce supply chains for fresh products with blockchain and reference effect Hesitation at increasing integration: The feasibility of Norway expanding cross-border renewable electricity interconnection to support European decarbonisation Shaping the future through developing and managing breakthrough innovations: A new conceptual framework Critical successes factors for the adoption of additive manufacturing: Integrated impact for circular economy model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1