Engaging marginalized communities in multi-level transformative innovation policy: The case of the Just Transition Fund

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124002
Jessica Clement , Lama Alarda , Artur Ochojski , Nathalie Crutzen
{"title":"Engaging marginalized communities in multi-level transformative innovation policy: The case of the Just Transition Fund","authors":"Jessica Clement ,&nbsp;Lama Alarda ,&nbsp;Artur Ochojski ,&nbsp;Nathalie Crutzen","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address grand challenges like climate change, transformative innovation policies (TIPs) are emerging as a framework for societal prosperity. Implemented through various instruments, TIPs may operate in a multi-level governance (MLG) context whereby policies originate at a supra-national level and are directed to national, regional, and local tiers. TIPs also emphasize inclusivity and engagement with marginalized communities. However, practical insights on these aspects for TIPs are limited. This paper therefore investigates how TIP instruments are channeled from a supra-national context to a local one to engage with marginalized communities. Taking Belgium as the setting for our paper, we focus on the European Green Deal as a TIP and the Just Transition Fund as the instrument. Finding a series of barriers that prevent engagement, we identify the key role of inter-organizational relationships (coordination, cooperation, collaboration), especially related to the initial vertical coordination of a TIP instrument. If vertical coordination does not extend to the local level, engagement with marginalized communities is difficult. Opening horizontal relationships to include a broader set of actors in decision-making processes is also important. Consequently, we unpack these barriers and build upon both the TIP and just transition literature by applying the participatory governance school of thought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 124002"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address grand challenges like climate change, transformative innovation policies (TIPs) are emerging as a framework for societal prosperity. Implemented through various instruments, TIPs may operate in a multi-level governance (MLG) context whereby policies originate at a supra-national level and are directed to national, regional, and local tiers. TIPs also emphasize inclusivity and engagement with marginalized communities. However, practical insights on these aspects for TIPs are limited. This paper therefore investigates how TIP instruments are channeled from a supra-national context to a local one to engage with marginalized communities. Taking Belgium as the setting for our paper, we focus on the European Green Deal as a TIP and the Just Transition Fund as the instrument. Finding a series of barriers that prevent engagement, we identify the key role of inter-organizational relationships (coordination, cooperation, collaboration), especially related to the initial vertical coordination of a TIP instrument. If vertical coordination does not extend to the local level, engagement with marginalized communities is difficult. Opening horizontal relationships to include a broader set of actors in decision-making processes is also important. Consequently, we unpack these barriers and build upon both the TIP and just transition literature by applying the participatory governance school of thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the forecasting of innovation diffusion: A combined actor- and system approach Dynamic optimization of e-commerce supply chains for fresh products with blockchain and reference effect Hesitation at increasing integration: The feasibility of Norway expanding cross-border renewable electricity interconnection to support European decarbonisation Shaping the future through developing and managing breakthrough innovations: A new conceptual framework Critical successes factors for the adoption of additive manufacturing: Integrated impact for circular economy model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1