How does digital trust boost open innovation? Evidence from a mixed approach

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123953
Jiangtao Chen, Wenyu Cai, Jiamei Luo, Hongyi Mao
{"title":"How does digital trust boost open innovation? Evidence from a mixed approach","authors":"Jiangtao Chen,&nbsp;Wenyu Cai,&nbsp;Jiamei Luo,&nbsp;Hongyi Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As new digital technologies continue to emerge, the trust mechanisms in open innovation are increasingly being discussed. Although previous research has explored the positive moderating effect of technology on digital trust in open innovation, limited attention has been given to the roles of inter-firm knowledge sharing and digital orientation. This study proposes a moderated mediation model based on open innovation and knowledge-based theory to advance research on this topic. Results from a survey dataset of 157 companies indicate that digital trust significantly influences open innovation, with knowledge sharing mediating such relationship. Moreover, a strong digital orientation significantly enhances the effect of digital trust on open innovation. A following fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis reveals a configuration perspective, showing that combining digital trust, sharing resources, sharing intensity, and digital orientation will affect open innovation. These results complement and refine previous regressions by identifying the conditions and paths through which digital trust affects the level of open innovation. Finally, a post hoc interview study involving 26 companies was conducted to confirm the complex relationships and reveal dynamic changes. This process also provided implementable strategies for enhancing digital trust and knowledge sharing. The mixed-method approach used in this study provides a deep understanding of the role mechanism of digital trust in open innovation from the theoretical and practical perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 123953"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524007510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As new digital technologies continue to emerge, the trust mechanisms in open innovation are increasingly being discussed. Although previous research has explored the positive moderating effect of technology on digital trust in open innovation, limited attention has been given to the roles of inter-firm knowledge sharing and digital orientation. This study proposes a moderated mediation model based on open innovation and knowledge-based theory to advance research on this topic. Results from a survey dataset of 157 companies indicate that digital trust significantly influences open innovation, with knowledge sharing mediating such relationship. Moreover, a strong digital orientation significantly enhances the effect of digital trust on open innovation. A following fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis reveals a configuration perspective, showing that combining digital trust, sharing resources, sharing intensity, and digital orientation will affect open innovation. These results complement and refine previous regressions by identifying the conditions and paths through which digital trust affects the level of open innovation. Finally, a post hoc interview study involving 26 companies was conducted to confirm the complex relationships and reveal dynamic changes. This process also provided implementable strategies for enhancing digital trust and knowledge sharing. The mixed-method approach used in this study provides a deep understanding of the role mechanism of digital trust in open innovation from the theoretical and practical perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字信任如何促进开放式创新?来自混合方法的证据
随着新型数字技术的不断涌现,开放式创新中的信任机制越来越受到人们的关注。虽然已有研究探讨了开放式创新中技术对数字信任的正向调节作用,但对企业间知识共享和数字化导向的作用关注较少。本研究提出了一个基于开放式创新和知识基础理论的有调节的中介模型,以推进这一主题的研究。157家企业的调查数据表明,数字信任显著影响开放式创新,知识共享在这种关系中起中介作用。此外,强烈的数字化取向显著增强了数字信任对开放式创新的影响。通过模糊集定性比较分析,揭示了配置视角,表明数字信任、共享资源、共享强度和数字化取向的组合会影响开放式创新。这些结果通过确定数字信任影响开放式创新水平的条件和路径,补充和完善了之前的回归。最后,对26家公司进行了事后访谈研究,以确认复杂的关系并揭示动态变化。这一进程还为加强数字信任和知识共享提供了可实施的战略。本研究采用的混合方法从理论和实践的角度深入理解了数字信任在开放式创新中的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
ESG and resource acquisition in Chinese startups: The role of financing strategies and resource constraints Examining the relationship between content length and engagement with news outlets on multiple social media platforms Autonomous AI agents in decentralized finance: Market dynamics, application areas, and theoretical implications Exploring the Nexus: TikTok cyberbullying, anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, and sex differences among young adults The future of digitally enabled circular strategies in manufacturing: A Delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1