Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model

IF 6.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Socio-economic Planning Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.seps.2025.102163
Mehmet Karadag , Muhammet Gul , Melih Yucesan , Miguel Ortiz-Barrios , Alessio Ishizaka , Jehangir Khan
{"title":"Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model","authors":"Mehmet Karadag ,&nbsp;Muhammet Gul ,&nbsp;Melih Yucesan ,&nbsp;Miguel Ortiz-Barrios ,&nbsp;Alessio Ishizaka ,&nbsp;Jehangir Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.seps.2025.102163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The environmental and economic transformation initiated by the European Green Deal is influencing not only EU member states, but also other countries engaged in trade with the EU. This transformation mandates a shift towards sustainable practices in sectors such as agriculture, industry, transportation, energy, and finance. Compliance with the Green Deal is increasingly crucial for countries, particularly those with significant commercial ties to the EU. However, differing levels of development lead to varying degrees of implementation. While studies on the Green Deal compliance of EU member states exist, an evaluation of Türkiye—a candidate EU member with substantial trade relations—would address a significant gap in the literature. This study introduces a novel hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model that combines subjective (Best Worst Method and its derivatives) and objective (Entropy) weighting to determine the relative importance of 14 sub-criteria under three main criteria: “Reducing” the impacts of climate change, “Protecting” the planet and health, and “Enabling” a green and just transition. Using the Ratio Product Model (RPM), Türkiye's Green Deal compliance from 2017 to 2021 was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings, and comparisons were made using various multi-attribute decision models, including SAW, TOPSIS, and VIKOR, as well as benchmarking against EU countries. The criteria weights, derived from a combination of subjective and objective methods, highlighted the dominant importance of the “Reducing” criterion across all methods. The “Enabling” and “Protecting” criteria showed slight variations in importance depending on the method. The RPM results indicated that 2021 was Türkiye's best-performing year in terms of Green Deal compliance, while 2017 showed the weakest performance. Despite some fluctuations between 2018 and 2019, Türkiye demonstrated significant progress overall. The study not only advances the methodology for evaluating Green Deal compliance but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, enabling more informed decision-making. By highlighting Türkiye's trajectory, the findings offer strategic guidance for non-EU countries aiming to align with Green Deal objectives, fostering sustainable development and strengthening economic ties with the EU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22033,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102163"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental and economic transformation initiated by the European Green Deal is influencing not only EU member states, but also other countries engaged in trade with the EU. This transformation mandates a shift towards sustainable practices in sectors such as agriculture, industry, transportation, energy, and finance. Compliance with the Green Deal is increasingly crucial for countries, particularly those with significant commercial ties to the EU. However, differing levels of development lead to varying degrees of implementation. While studies on the Green Deal compliance of EU member states exist, an evaluation of Türkiye—a candidate EU member with substantial trade relations—would address a significant gap in the literature. This study introduces a novel hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model that combines subjective (Best Worst Method and its derivatives) and objective (Entropy) weighting to determine the relative importance of 14 sub-criteria under three main criteria: “Reducing” the impacts of climate change, “Protecting” the planet and health, and “Enabling” a green and just transition. Using the Ratio Product Model (RPM), Türkiye's Green Deal compliance from 2017 to 2021 was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings, and comparisons were made using various multi-attribute decision models, including SAW, TOPSIS, and VIKOR, as well as benchmarking against EU countries. The criteria weights, derived from a combination of subjective and objective methods, highlighted the dominant importance of the “Reducing” criterion across all methods. The “Enabling” and “Protecting” criteria showed slight variations in importance depending on the method. The RPM results indicated that 2021 was Türkiye's best-performing year in terms of Green Deal compliance, while 2017 showed the weakest performance. Despite some fluctuations between 2018 and 2019, Türkiye demonstrated significant progress overall. The study not only advances the methodology for evaluating Green Deal compliance but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, enabling more informed decision-making. By highlighting Türkiye's trajectory, the findings offer strategic guidance for non-EU countries aiming to align with Green Deal objectives, fostering sustainable development and strengthening economic ties with the EU.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Socio-economic Planning Sciences
Socio-economic Planning Sciences OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
13.10%
发文量
294
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Studies directed toward the more effective utilization of existing resources, e.g. mathematical programming models of health care delivery systems with relevance to more effective program design; systems analysis of fire outbreaks and its relevance to the location of fire stations; statistical analysis of the efficiency of a developing country economy or industry. Studies relating to the interaction of various segments of society and technology, e.g. the effects of government health policies on the utilization and design of hospital facilities; the relationship between housing density and the demands on public transportation or other service facilities: patterns and implications of urban development and air or water pollution. Studies devoted to the anticipations of and response to future needs for social, health and other human services, e.g. the relationship between industrial growth and the development of educational resources in affected areas; investigation of future demands for material and child health resources in a developing country; design of effective recycling in an urban setting.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of highway improvements on new firm location in underdeveloped regions: Evidence from China The new mode for promoting the redevelopment of urban villages in China: A research on the behavior of stakeholders The time-definite hub line location problem Multidimensional poverty in Benin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1