Women intimate partner violence revictimization during protection orders in Montevideo, Uruguay. Risk factors and policy implications

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Journal of Law Crime and Justice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100720
Victoria Gambetta, Sofía Vanoli-Imperiale
{"title":"Women intimate partner violence revictimization during protection orders in Montevideo, Uruguay. Risk factors and policy implications","authors":"Victoria Gambetta,&nbsp;Sofía Vanoli-Imperiale","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores risk factors for Protection Order (PO) violation in intimate partner violence (IPV) cases in Montevideo, Uruguay, a topic not yet investigated in Latin America. Using a sample of 1057 police-reported IPV cases, logistic regression compares literature-supported risk factors with those used in public policy to predict women's IPV revictimization. Results show that 26% of offenders violate POs, mainly through harassment (82%) and psychological violence (46%), and police monitoring reduces risk of offenders' recidivism by 48.5%. Additionally, they highlight that IPV trajectories of both victims (OR = 1.85) and offenders (OR = 1.89) are the strongest predictors of reabuse. These findings suggest that Uruguayan policymakers should rethink police intervention and public action on IPV by focusing on two key actions: increasing investment in data collection and analysis to improve PO monitoring and police response, and developing strategies beyond criminal sanctions to address offender treatment and victim support to prevent IPV reabuse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 100720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061624000727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores risk factors for Protection Order (PO) violation in intimate partner violence (IPV) cases in Montevideo, Uruguay, a topic not yet investigated in Latin America. Using a sample of 1057 police-reported IPV cases, logistic regression compares literature-supported risk factors with those used in public policy to predict women's IPV revictimization. Results show that 26% of offenders violate POs, mainly through harassment (82%) and psychological violence (46%), and police monitoring reduces risk of offenders' recidivism by 48.5%. Additionally, they highlight that IPV trajectories of both victims (OR = 1.85) and offenders (OR = 1.89) are the strongest predictors of reabuse. These findings suggest that Uruguayan policymakers should rethink police intervention and public action on IPV by focusing on two key actions: increasing investment in data collection and analysis to improve PO monitoring and police response, and developing strategies beyond criminal sanctions to address offender treatment and victim support to prevent IPV reabuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌拉圭蒙得维的亚保护令期间妇女亲密伴侣暴力再次受害。风险因素和政策影响
本研究探讨了乌拉圭蒙得维的亚亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)案件中保护令(PO)违反的风险因素,这一主题尚未在拉丁美洲进行调查。使用1057例警方报告的IPV病例样本,逻辑回归比较文献支持的风险因素与公共政策中用于预测妇女IPV再次受害的风险因素。结果显示,26%的违法者违反了法律,主要是通过骚扰(82%)和心理暴力(46%),警察的监督使违法者的再犯风险降低了48.5%。此外,他们强调受害者(OR = 1.85)和犯罪者(OR = 1.89)的IPV轨迹是再滥用的最强预测因子。这些研究结果表明,乌拉圭的政策制定者应该重新考虑警察对IPV的干预和公共行动,重点关注两项关键行动:增加对数据收集和分析的投资,以改善PO监测和警察反应,并制定除刑事制裁之外的战略,以解决罪犯治疗和受害者支持问题,以防止IPV再次滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.
期刊最新文献
Do meteorological and environmental factors influence theft crimes? A study on the risk of theft crimes in HN City Procedural justice, social identity and public cooperation in post-Confucian societies - A test of group engagement model in Taiwan Addressing challenges in investigating money laundering cases facilitated by underground banking across the Taiwan strait: The role of supervisory technology (SupTech) Impact of overcrowding on the well-being and human rights of people in prison Clear, hold, build: Legitimate policing model, or Emperor's new clothes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1