Jennifer Burns , Amber R. Li , Kayla E. Rohr , Michael L. Thomas , Michael J. McCarthy , Alejandro D. Meruelo
{"title":"The influence of chronotype, socioeconomic status, latitude, longitude, and seasonality on cognitive performance and academic outcomes in adolescents","authors":"Jennifer Burns , Amber R. Li , Kayla E. Rohr , Michael L. Thomas , Michael J. McCarthy , Alejandro D. Meruelo","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2025.01.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adolescents' cognitive development and academic performance are influenced by sleep patterns, socioeconomic status (SES), and geographic factors. This study investigated how chronotype, social jetlag, weekday sleep duration, longitude, latitude, and SES impact cognitive outcomes and academic performance in a diverse adolescent sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 3741 adolescents in a longitudinal study were analyzed. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using NIH Toolbox measures (vocabulary, attention, working memory, pattern recognition, and reading). Self-reported academic grades were included as an additional outcome. Sleep variables were derived from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire. Linear mixed-effects models examined the relationships between predictors and outcomes, controlling for age, sex, SES, latitude, longitude, seasonality, and time of testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Later chronotype and greater social jetlag were associated with poorer cognitive performance in vocabulary (β=−0.08, −0.18), working memory (β=−0.01, −0.09), and reading (β=−0.01, −0.17). Latitude showed small positive associations with vocabulary (β=0.09), attention (β=0.07), and working memory (β=0.07). In contrast, longitude showed negligible associations with cognitive and academic outcomes (∣β∣<0.05), suggesting limited geographic variability along this axis. Higher household income was associated with better performance in vocabulary (β=0.07) and reading (β=0.06), and better grades (β=−0.04). Males demonstrated better attention scores (β=0.11) but poorer pattern recognition (β=−0.20), along with lower academic performance compared to females (β=0.19). Academic grades were positively associated with chronotype (β=0.14) and social jetlag (β=0.07) but negatively with weekday sleep duration (β=−0.06). Seasonality showed no significant effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Chronotype, social jetlag, latitude, and SES are significant predictors of cognitive and academic outcomes in adolescents, while longitude showed minimal effects. These findings underscore the importance of circadian alignment and socioeconomic and geographic contexts in shaping adolescent development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945725000395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Adolescents' cognitive development and academic performance are influenced by sleep patterns, socioeconomic status (SES), and geographic factors. This study investigated how chronotype, social jetlag, weekday sleep duration, longitude, latitude, and SES impact cognitive outcomes and academic performance in a diverse adolescent sample.
Methods
Data from 3741 adolescents in a longitudinal study were analyzed. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using NIH Toolbox measures (vocabulary, attention, working memory, pattern recognition, and reading). Self-reported academic grades were included as an additional outcome. Sleep variables were derived from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire. Linear mixed-effects models examined the relationships between predictors and outcomes, controlling for age, sex, SES, latitude, longitude, seasonality, and time of testing.
Results
Later chronotype and greater social jetlag were associated with poorer cognitive performance in vocabulary (β=−0.08, −0.18), working memory (β=−0.01, −0.09), and reading (β=−0.01, −0.17). Latitude showed small positive associations with vocabulary (β=0.09), attention (β=0.07), and working memory (β=0.07). In contrast, longitude showed negligible associations with cognitive and academic outcomes (∣β∣<0.05), suggesting limited geographic variability along this axis. Higher household income was associated with better performance in vocabulary (β=0.07) and reading (β=0.06), and better grades (β=−0.04). Males demonstrated better attention scores (β=0.11) but poorer pattern recognition (β=−0.20), along with lower academic performance compared to females (β=0.19). Academic grades were positively associated with chronotype (β=0.14) and social jetlag (β=0.07) but negatively with weekday sleep duration (β=−0.06). Seasonality showed no significant effects.
Conclusions
Chronotype, social jetlag, latitude, and SES are significant predictors of cognitive and academic outcomes in adolescents, while longitude showed minimal effects. These findings underscore the importance of circadian alignment and socioeconomic and geographic contexts in shaping adolescent development.
期刊介绍:
Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without.
A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry.
The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.