Which data should be publicly accessible? Dispatches from public managers

IF 10 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102008
Mary K. Feeney , Federica Fusi , Ignacio Pezo
{"title":"Which data should be publicly accessible? Dispatches from public managers","authors":"Mary K. Feeney ,&nbsp;Federica Fusi ,&nbsp;Ignacio Pezo","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Open government data (OGD) seeks to promote transparency and accountability by enabling public access to government data. While public managers are increasingly supportive of OGD initiatives worldwide, researchers note that they also carefully select which data to release to balance openness with traditional values of professionalism and secrecy as well as concerns about cyber incidents and privacy. Understanding the factors that influence this micro-level choice is important to make valuable types of data publicly accessible. Using 2018 survey data from a nationally representative sample of 2500 department heads in 500 small and medium-sized US cities, we look at variation in public managers' level of comfort with making different types of government data open - from criminal records to government employee salary data. We find that managerial comfort reflects historic practices of public accessibility and privacy concerns with individual data. Managers who believe OGD creates positive outcomes for society are more comfortable with publicly disclosing all types of data<em>.</em> We also find variation across department types, suggesting fragmented views towards OGD within public organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 102008"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) seeks to promote transparency and accountability by enabling public access to government data. While public managers are increasingly supportive of OGD initiatives worldwide, researchers note that they also carefully select which data to release to balance openness with traditional values of professionalism and secrecy as well as concerns about cyber incidents and privacy. Understanding the factors that influence this micro-level choice is important to make valuable types of data publicly accessible. Using 2018 survey data from a nationally representative sample of 2500 department heads in 500 small and medium-sized US cities, we look at variation in public managers' level of comfort with making different types of government data open - from criminal records to government employee salary data. We find that managerial comfort reflects historic practices of public accessibility and privacy concerns with individual data. Managers who believe OGD creates positive outcomes for society are more comfortable with publicly disclosing all types of data. We also find variation across department types, suggesting fragmented views towards OGD within public organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些数据应该公开访问?来自公共管理人员的派遣
政府数据开放(OGD)旨在通过使公众能够获取政府数据来促进透明度和问责制。尽管全球范围内的公共管理者越来越支持OGD计划,但研究人员指出,他们也会仔细选择发布哪些数据,以平衡开放性与专业和保密的传统价值观,以及对网络事件和隐私的担忧。了解影响这种微观层面选择的因素对于使有价值的数据类型能够公开访问非常重要。我们利用2018年对美国500个中小城市2500名部门主管的全国代表性样本的调查数据,研究了公共管理人员对不同类型的政府数据(从犯罪记录到政府雇员工资数据)开放程度的差异。我们发现,管理舒适度反映了公众可访问性和个人数据隐私问题的历史实践。相信OGD为社会带来积极成果的管理者更愿意公开披露所有类型的数据。我们还发现了部门类型之间的差异,这表明公共组织内部对OGD的看法是分散的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
Governing digital government platforms for service innovation: A staged governance model based on boundary resources and coordination activities Beyond technology: Exploring public value creation mechanisms and outcomes in platform-to-government data sharing Operational transparency in government social media communication: Two survey experiments on representation, engagement, and collaboration Positioning public sector practitioners as ‘moral crumple zones’: Mechanisms in the early use of generative AI work support tools Governing Ethics for the Digital Transformation: Developing, Testing, and Validating a Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1