Differentiated TB care matrix: Validating an assessment tool for healthcare workers providing differentiated TB care using Delphi technique

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101935
Riswana S. Ansari , Ankeeta Menona Jacob , Avinash K. Shetty , Shazia Anjum
{"title":"Differentiated TB care matrix: Validating an assessment tool for healthcare workers providing differentiated TB care using Delphi technique","authors":"Riswana S. Ansari ,&nbsp;Ankeeta Menona Jacob ,&nbsp;Avinash K. Shetty ,&nbsp;Shazia Anjum","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The provision of Differentiated Tuberculosis (TB) Care by healthcare personnel is crucial in optimising patient outcomes and resource utilisation in TB units. This study explores validating a questionnaire on differentiated TB care provision from the healthcare providers' perspective, focusing on facilitating factors and challenges in the healthcare delivery for TB patients using the Delphi Technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>A multidimensional model was designed to assess differentiated TB care provision by healthcare providers in Karnataka using inductive and deductive methods. Between January 2024 and March 2024, we used the Delphi technique via email and in-person contacts. We engaged a panel of Ten Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to refine and validate the assessment tool containing 146 items iteratively using 2 rounds of 5 SMEs each. For each round, the following metrics were calculated: Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Scale Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Item Impact Score (IIS, Face Validity). The final tool contained only questions with Item Impact Scores of ≥1.5, CVRs of ≥0.99, and CVIs of ≥0.8 (p-value &lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Item Impact Score (Face Validity) of 126 items accepted as facilitating factors and barriers in providing Differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical officers for TB patients was ≥1.5. Content Validity Ratios (CVR) for the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients was ≥0.99, except for 19 items removed from the final tool. The Scale Content Validity Indices (for relevance), i.e., S-CVI (Average) and S-CVI (Proportional relevance), for 19 items that were removed from the tool failed to reach ≥0.8.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>By determining acceptable content validity ratios and indices using the Delphi technique, this study has developed and validated a tool to assess the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by the Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The provision of Differentiated Tuberculosis (TB) Care by healthcare personnel is crucial in optimising patient outcomes and resource utilisation in TB units. This study explores validating a questionnaire on differentiated TB care provision from the healthcare providers' perspective, focusing on facilitating factors and challenges in the healthcare delivery for TB patients using the Delphi Technique.

Methods and materials

A multidimensional model was designed to assess differentiated TB care provision by healthcare providers in Karnataka using inductive and deductive methods. Between January 2024 and March 2024, we used the Delphi technique via email and in-person contacts. We engaged a panel of Ten Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to refine and validate the assessment tool containing 146 items iteratively using 2 rounds of 5 SMEs each. For each round, the following metrics were calculated: Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Scale Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Item Impact Score (IIS, Face Validity). The final tool contained only questions with Item Impact Scores of ≥1.5, CVRs of ≥0.99, and CVIs of ≥0.8 (p-value <0.05).

Results

The Item Impact Score (Face Validity) of 126 items accepted as facilitating factors and barriers in providing Differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical officers for TB patients was ≥1.5. Content Validity Ratios (CVR) for the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients was ≥0.99, except for 19 items removed from the final tool. The Scale Content Validity Indices (for relevance), i.e., S-CVI (Average) and S-CVI (Proportional relevance), for 19 items that were removed from the tool failed to reach ≥0.8.

Conclusions

By determining acceptable content validity ratios and indices using the Delphi technique, this study has developed and validated a tool to assess the facilitating factors and barriers in providing differentiated TB care by the Community Health Officers and Medical Officers for TB patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Celiac disease and COVID-19: Leveraging health registries for crucial insights and public health strategies Geospatial insights into chronic bronchitis: Evaluating hotspots and environmental factors in MUDHRA-cohort of Mysuru district, India Harnessing ensemble deep learning models for precise detection of gynaecological cancers Prevalence and mortality of infective endocarditis in Kazakhstan: A nationwide epidemiological study (2018–2022) Assessment of 2021 surveillance system for under-five children with pneumonia in Bantul Regency, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1