Accelerators and hurdles, and their mediating effects on electric vehicle adoption

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.020
Hafsoah Ahmad , T.M. Rahul , Navdeep K. Asija
{"title":"Accelerators and hurdles, and their mediating effects on electric vehicle adoption","authors":"Hafsoah Ahmad ,&nbsp;T.M. Rahul ,&nbsp;Navdeep K. Asija","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sale of electric vehicles (EVs) in India was only 1.32% of all vehicle sales for FY 21–22. Through this study, the authors sought to contribute to the nascent field of research regarding the constructs influencing this low adoption. The study explores the existence of ‘early adopters’ among Indian consumers and investigates the direct and indirect impact of environmentalism on EV purchase propensity. The causal factors of the variation in the market shares of electric two-wheelers and electric cars in India's EV sales are addressed by estimating two Structural Equation Models encompassing latent variables and socio-demographics influencing their uptake. <em>Technological Affinity</em> emerged as the prime motivator and Concerns about Charging and Battery as the key hindrance to electric car purchase propensity. Environmental Consciousness positively affects both electric two-wheelers and electric car purchase propensities indirectly through <em>Awareness about EVs &amp; Green Policies</em>, which itself demonstrates a positive influence in both cases. The results suggest that in India marketing electric cars as technologically superior cars rather than eco-friendly cars would be more effective. Concerns about Charging and Battery remained insignificant in the case of electric two-wheelers, lending an explanation to their greater market share despite inadequate infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 20-30"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sale of electric vehicles (EVs) in India was only 1.32% of all vehicle sales for FY 21–22. Through this study, the authors sought to contribute to the nascent field of research regarding the constructs influencing this low adoption. The study explores the existence of ‘early adopters’ among Indian consumers and investigates the direct and indirect impact of environmentalism on EV purchase propensity. The causal factors of the variation in the market shares of electric two-wheelers and electric cars in India's EV sales are addressed by estimating two Structural Equation Models encompassing latent variables and socio-demographics influencing their uptake. Technological Affinity emerged as the prime motivator and Concerns about Charging and Battery as the key hindrance to electric car purchase propensity. Environmental Consciousness positively affects both electric two-wheelers and electric car purchase propensities indirectly through Awareness about EVs & Green Policies, which itself demonstrates a positive influence in both cases. The results suggest that in India marketing electric cars as technologically superior cars rather than eco-friendly cars would be more effective. Concerns about Charging and Battery remained insignificant in the case of electric two-wheelers, lending an explanation to their greater market share despite inadequate infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加速器和障碍,以及它们对电动汽车采用的中介效应
印度的电动汽车销量仅占21-22财年所有汽车销量的1.32%。通过这项研究,作者试图对影响这种低采用率的构念的新兴研究领域做出贡献。该研究探讨了印度消费者中“早期采用者”的存在,并调查了环保主义对电动汽车购买倾向的直接和间接影响。电动两轮车和电动汽车在印度电动汽车销售中市场份额变化的因果因素通过估计两个结构方程模型来解决,该模型包含潜在变量和影响其吸收的社会人口统计学。技术亲和性是电动汽车购买倾向的主要驱动因素,对充电和电池的担忧是电动汽车购买倾向的主要障碍。环境意识通过对电动汽车的认识间接影响电动两轮车和电动汽车的购买倾向;绿色政策,它本身在两种情况下都显示出积极的影响。研究结果表明,在印度,将电动汽车作为技术先进的汽车而不是环保汽车进行营销会更有效。对充电和电池的担忧在电动两轮车的情况下仍然微不足道,这解释了尽管基础设施不足,但电动两轮车的市场份额却更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1