An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Advanced Engineering Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103097
Liming Xiao , Tao Fang , Guangquan Huang , Muhammet Deveci
{"title":"An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties","authors":"Liming Xiao ,&nbsp;Tao Fang ,&nbsp;Guangquan Huang ,&nbsp;Muhammet Deveci","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2024.103097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (<em>q</em>-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for <em>q</em>-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel <em>q</em>-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103097"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034624007481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (q-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for q-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel q-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
期刊最新文献
Intelligent wireless tool wear monitoring system based on chucked tool condition monitoring ring and deep learning Correlation-aware constrained many-objective service composition in crowdsourcing design Small dense Mini/Micro LED high-precision inspection based on instance segmentation with local detail enhancement ATSIU: A large-scale dataset for spoken instruction understanding in air traffic control A novel multi-task fault detection model embedded with spatio-temporal feature fusion for wind turbine pitch and drive train systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1