An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Advanced Engineering Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103097
Liming Xiao , Tao Fang , Guangquan Huang , Muhammet Deveci
{"title":"An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties","authors":"Liming Xiao ,&nbsp;Tao Fang ,&nbsp;Guangquan Huang ,&nbsp;Muhammet Deveci","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2024.103097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (<em>q</em>-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for <em>q</em>-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel <em>q</em>-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103097"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034624007481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (q-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for q-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel q-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊加权零不一致性和考虑内在不确定性的组合折衷方案的设计概念综合评价方法
设计概念评估在新产品开发阶段至关重要,有效的评估可以验证新产品的可行性,降低项目风险。引入了许多有价值的DCE方法来确定几种设计概念中的最优方案。然而,以往的方法存在着对多个不确定因素的操纵、权重的确定、最佳概念的确定等缺点。为了解决这些问题,本文采用模糊加权零不一致性(FWZIC)和组合妥协解(CoCoSo)方法,建立了一种基于q-rung正交模糊粗糙集(q-ROFR)的DCE模型。首先,综合q阶正形模糊集和粗糙逼近的优点,为q-ROFR集提供了一个评估环境,并引入了一些新的q-ROFR爱因斯坦聚合算子对信息进行聚合,以更有效地处理不确定性。在此基础上,采用FWZIC法更可靠地确定准则权重,采用CoCoSo法对方案进行性能评价,更准确、灵活地确定最优方案。最后,以卧式加工中心的DCE为例,进行了灵敏度分析和比较,验证了该模型的优越性。结果表明,该方法是有效的,可以更可靠地识别出最佳概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic in-domain and out-of-domain learning to strengthen visual scene understanding in data-scarce, imbalanced construction settings Span entropy: A novel time series complexity measurement with a redesigned phase space reconstruction Collaborative planning model for mixed traffic flow in bottleneck zones considering compliance and the impact of human-driven vehicles A method for safety risk dynamic assessment in flight cockpit intelligent human-machine interaction Multi-objective differential evolution algorithm based on partial reinforcement learning intelligence for engineering design problems and physics-informed neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1