Driving factors behind station-based car sharing adoption: Discovering distinct user profiles through a latent class cluster analysis

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.001
Hidde van der Linden , Gonçalo Correia , Niels van Oort , Suze Koster , Martijn Legêne , Maarten Kroesen
{"title":"Driving factors behind station-based car sharing adoption: Discovering distinct user profiles through a latent class cluster analysis","authors":"Hidde van der Linden ,&nbsp;Gonçalo Correia ,&nbsp;Niels van Oort ,&nbsp;Suze Koster ,&nbsp;Martijn Legêne ,&nbsp;Maarten Kroesen","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In light of growing environmental challenges, the need to reconsider how we approach personal transportation is becoming increasingly evident. A shift from a private car-focused mobility system towards a more sustainable and equitable transportation system is needed. Car sharing is considered a means to achieve this, however, its usage and its impact are not entirely understood, as many studies do not consider the motives of individuals to use this alternative, treating the population of users as a homogeneous group. This study aims to reveal distinct car sharing usage profiles to gain a thorough understanding of the various motivates behind car sharing and its relation with travel behaviour. Six user profiles are uncovered using a Latent Class Cluster Analysis (LCCA) based on station-based carsharing data of one company operating in the Netherlands gathered through an online survey (N = 1281). The results show significant diversity in car sharing motives. The identified user groups have different effects on travel behaviour. Environmentally motivated car sharers use the shared car as a complete replacement for their private car, causing a substantial decrease in car ownership and usage. For utilitarian car sharers, and especially formerly carless individuals, the decrease in car ownership is less substantial and even an increase in car use can be observed. Finally, it was found that car sharing is mostly complementary to public transport use. Ways to promote the use of both modes could be explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 232-241"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400369X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of growing environmental challenges, the need to reconsider how we approach personal transportation is becoming increasingly evident. A shift from a private car-focused mobility system towards a more sustainable and equitable transportation system is needed. Car sharing is considered a means to achieve this, however, its usage and its impact are not entirely understood, as many studies do not consider the motives of individuals to use this alternative, treating the population of users as a homogeneous group. This study aims to reveal distinct car sharing usage profiles to gain a thorough understanding of the various motivates behind car sharing and its relation with travel behaviour. Six user profiles are uncovered using a Latent Class Cluster Analysis (LCCA) based on station-based carsharing data of one company operating in the Netherlands gathered through an online survey (N = 1281). The results show significant diversity in car sharing motives. The identified user groups have different effects on travel behaviour. Environmentally motivated car sharers use the shared car as a complete replacement for their private car, causing a substantial decrease in car ownership and usage. For utilitarian car sharers, and especially formerly carless individuals, the decrease in car ownership is less substantial and even an increase in car use can be observed. Finally, it was found that car sharing is mostly complementary to public transport use. Ways to promote the use of both modes could be explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于车站的汽车共享采用背后的驱动因素:通过潜在类聚类分析发现不同的用户概况
鉴于日益严峻的环境挑战,重新考虑个人交通方式的必要性变得越来越明显。我们需要从以私家车为中心的交通系统转向更可持续、更公平的交通系统。汽车共享被认为是实现这一目标的一种手段,然而,它的使用和影响并不完全清楚,因为许多研究没有考虑个人使用这种替代方案的动机,将用户群体视为一个同质群体。本研究旨在揭示不同的汽车共享使用概况,以全面了解汽车共享背后的各种动机及其与出行行为的关系。通过在线调查(N = 1281)收集荷兰一家公司基于站点的汽车共享数据,使用潜在类聚类分析(LCCA)发现了六个用户配置文件。结果显示,汽车共享动机存在显著差异。已确定的用户群体对旅行行为有不同的影响。出于环保动机的汽车共享者将共享汽车作为私家车的完全替代品,导致汽车保有量和使用量大幅下降。对于功利主义的汽车共享者,尤其是以前没有车的人来说,汽车拥有量的下降幅度较小,甚至可以观察到汽车使用量的增加。最后,我们发现汽车共享主要是对公共交通使用的补充。可以探索如何促进这两种模式的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1