A survey on multi-objective, model-based, oil and gas field development optimization: Current status and future directions

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Petroleum Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.petsci.2024.09.018
Auref Rostamian , Matheus Bernardelli de Moraes , Denis José Schiozer , Guilherme Palermo Coelho
{"title":"A survey on multi-objective, model-based, oil and gas field development optimization: Current status and future directions","authors":"Auref Rostamian ,&nbsp;Matheus Bernardelli de Moraes ,&nbsp;Denis José Schiozer ,&nbsp;Guilherme Palermo Coelho","doi":"10.1016/j.petsci.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the area of reservoir engineering, the optimization of oil and gas production is a complex task involving a myriad of interconnected decision variables shaping the production system's infrastructure. Traditionally, this optimization process was centered on a single objective, such as net present value, return on investment, cumulative oil production, or cumulative water production. However, the inherent complexity of reservoir exploration necessitates a departure from this single-objective approach. Multiple conflicting production and economic indicators must now be considered to enable more precise and robust decision-making. In response to this challenge, researchers have embarked on a journey to explore field development optimization of multiple conflicting criteria, employing the formidable tools of multi-objective optimization algorithms. These algorithms delve into the intricate terrain of production strategy design, seeking to strike a delicate balance between the often-contrasting objectives. Over the years, a plethora of these algorithms have emerged, ranging from a priori methods to a posteriori approach, each offering unique insights and capabilities. This survey endeavors to encapsulate, categorize, and scrutinize these invaluable contributions to field development optimization, which grapple with the complexities of multiple conflicting objective functions. Beyond the overview of existing methodologies, we delve into the persisting challenges faced by researchers and practitioners alike. Notably, the application of multi-objective optimization techniques to production optimization is hindered by the resource-intensive nature of reservoir simulation, especially when confronted with inherent uncertainties. As a result of this survey, emerging opportunities have been identified that will serve as catalysts for pivotal research endeavors in the future. As intelligent and more efficient algorithms continue to evolve, the potential for addressing hitherto insurmountable field development optimization obstacles becomes increasingly viable. This discussion on future prospects aims to inspire critical research, guiding the way toward innovative solutions in the ever-evolving landscape of oil and gas production optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19938,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Science","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 508-526"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822624002577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the area of reservoir engineering, the optimization of oil and gas production is a complex task involving a myriad of interconnected decision variables shaping the production system's infrastructure. Traditionally, this optimization process was centered on a single objective, such as net present value, return on investment, cumulative oil production, or cumulative water production. However, the inherent complexity of reservoir exploration necessitates a departure from this single-objective approach. Multiple conflicting production and economic indicators must now be considered to enable more precise and robust decision-making. In response to this challenge, researchers have embarked on a journey to explore field development optimization of multiple conflicting criteria, employing the formidable tools of multi-objective optimization algorithms. These algorithms delve into the intricate terrain of production strategy design, seeking to strike a delicate balance between the often-contrasting objectives. Over the years, a plethora of these algorithms have emerged, ranging from a priori methods to a posteriori approach, each offering unique insights and capabilities. This survey endeavors to encapsulate, categorize, and scrutinize these invaluable contributions to field development optimization, which grapple with the complexities of multiple conflicting objective functions. Beyond the overview of existing methodologies, we delve into the persisting challenges faced by researchers and practitioners alike. Notably, the application of multi-objective optimization techniques to production optimization is hindered by the resource-intensive nature of reservoir simulation, especially when confronted with inherent uncertainties. As a result of this survey, emerging opportunities have been identified that will serve as catalysts for pivotal research endeavors in the future. As intelligent and more efficient algorithms continue to evolve, the potential for addressing hitherto insurmountable field development optimization obstacles becomes increasingly viable. This discussion on future prospects aims to inspire critical research, guiding the way toward innovative solutions in the ever-evolving landscape of oil and gas production optimization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多目标、基于模型的油气田开发优化研究现状与未来方向
在油藏工程领域,油气生产优化是一项复杂的任务,涉及到影响生产系统基础设施的无数相互关联的决策变量。传统上,这种优化过程以单一目标为中心,如净现值、投资回报、累计产油量或累计产水量。然而,储层勘探的固有复杂性要求我们放弃这种单一目标的方法。现在必须考虑多种相互冲突的生产和经济指标,以便作出更精确和有力的决策。为了应对这一挑战,研究人员已经开始探索多种冲突标准的油田开发优化,采用多目标优化算法的强大工具。这些算法深入研究生产策略设计的复杂领域,试图在经常对立的目标之间取得微妙的平衡。多年来,出现了大量这样的算法,从先验方法到后验方法,每种算法都提供了独特的见解和能力。本调查试图概括、分类和仔细审查这些对油田开发优化的宝贵贡献,这些贡献与多个相互冲突的目标函数的复杂性作斗争。除了对现有方法的概述之外,我们还深入研究了研究人员和实践者所面临的持续挑战。值得注意的是,油藏模拟的资源密集性,特别是面对固有的不确定性时,阻碍了多目标优化技术在生产优化中的应用。这项调查的结果是,已经确定了新兴机会,这些机会将成为未来关键研究努力的催化剂。随着智能和更高效算法的不断发展,解决迄今为止无法克服的油田开发优化障碍的潜力变得越来越可行。对未来前景的讨论旨在激发批判性研究,为不断发展的油气生产优化领域的创新解决方案提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Science
Petroleum Science 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.10%
发文量
311
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Petroleum Science is the only English journal in China on petroleum science and technology that is intended for professionals engaged in petroleum science research and technical applications all over the world, as well as the managerial personnel of oil companies. It covers petroleum geology, petroleum geophysics, petroleum engineering, petrochemistry & chemical engineering, petroleum mechanics, and economic management. It aims to introduce the latest results in oil industry research in China, promote cooperation in petroleum science research between China and the rest of the world, and build a bridge for scientific communication between China and the world.
期刊最新文献
Long-term sustained release of small molecular surfactants using microcapsules Competition between viscous and capillary forces triggers diversity of fluid distribution and imbibition modes Application of acrylic-based wellbore strengthening material in water-based drilling fluid to stabilize the fractured formation Study of the effect of nanoemulsion on the EOR in low-permeability, highly waxy oil reservoirs based on NMR displacement experiments Stability mechanism and steady-state flow characteristics of oil-resistant foam in high-salinity reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1