How does the travel effect of e-shopping differ by travel mode? Empirical evidence from Chengdu, China

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.007
Enlong Li , Yongchun Yang , Kunbo Shi , Frank Witlox
{"title":"How does the travel effect of e-shopping differ by travel mode? Empirical evidence from Chengdu, China","authors":"Enlong Li ,&nbsp;Yongchun Yang ,&nbsp;Kunbo Shi ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the growing popularity of e-commerce, there has been a surge of interest in comprehending the potential impacts of e-shopping on travel behavior. However, as individuals may use various means of transportation for their shopping trips, the effect of e-shopping on travel modes might vary accordingly. This study aims to examine how the travel effect of e-shopping differs by travel mode. The data were drawn from face-to-face interviews with 742 respondents in Chengdu, China. The results reveal a substitution effect of e-shopping on shopping trips by all means of transportation considered in this study, including car, public transit, bicycle, and walking. Notably, e-shopping for non-daily goods (i.e., clothes and books) has a greater influence on reducing trips by public transit than other travel modes. Meanwhile, e-shopping for daily goods (i.e., packaged foods and daily necessities) shows a greater substitution effect on walking trips. Furthermore, we identify several factors that influence the substitution effect of e-shopping on the use of travel modes. Particularly, increasing street density has positive implications for reducing car or walking trips, while increasing employment density exerts a positive influence in fostering the use of sustainable travel modes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 260-269"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing popularity of e-commerce, there has been a surge of interest in comprehending the potential impacts of e-shopping on travel behavior. However, as individuals may use various means of transportation for their shopping trips, the effect of e-shopping on travel modes might vary accordingly. This study aims to examine how the travel effect of e-shopping differs by travel mode. The data were drawn from face-to-face interviews with 742 respondents in Chengdu, China. The results reveal a substitution effect of e-shopping on shopping trips by all means of transportation considered in this study, including car, public transit, bicycle, and walking. Notably, e-shopping for non-daily goods (i.e., clothes and books) has a greater influence on reducing trips by public transit than other travel modes. Meanwhile, e-shopping for daily goods (i.e., packaged foods and daily necessities) shows a greater substitution effect on walking trips. Furthermore, we identify several factors that influence the substitution effect of e-shopping on the use of travel modes. Particularly, increasing street density has positive implications for reducing car or walking trips, while increasing employment density exerts a positive influence in fostering the use of sustainable travel modes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Who Gets What? A user perspective on initial credit allocation in Tradable Mobility Credit Schemes Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer The influence mechanisms of transport infrastructure on China’s domestic trade: Evidence from trade weight data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1