Revisiting the impact of container port service quality on customer satisfaction: A configuration approach

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.008
Saeyeon Roh , Mohamed Yacine Haddoud , Adah-Kole Emmanuel Onjewu , Hyunmi Jang , Vinh Thai
{"title":"Revisiting the impact of container port service quality on customer satisfaction: A configuration approach","authors":"Saeyeon Roh ,&nbsp;Mohamed Yacine Haddoud ,&nbsp;Adah-Kole Emmanuel Onjewu ,&nbsp;Hyunmi Jang ,&nbsp;Vinh Thai","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In global port competitions, container port service quality (CPSQ) plays a critical role in determining user satisfaction and port competitiveness. Despite numerous empirical research efforts on the relationship between CPSQ and customer satisfaction, few studies have analysed the configurational effects of CPSQ on customer satisfaction. To address a gap in research, this study examines the factors that influence customer satisfaction among port users, including cargo owners and logistics service providers. The focus is on container ports in non-transshipment ports in South Korea, as well as a transshipment port in Singapore, which are representative of major global maritime countries. In this study, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied to a sample of 99 in South Korea and 175 from Singapore to understand the causal configurations of CPSQ factors, including resources, outcomes, processes, management, image and social responsibility determining the level of satisfaction of port users. The findings using current configurational thinking through fsQCA can assist academics in generating valuable insights that are closely in line with the intricate realities of global port competitions. This approach can also provide practical implications for managers operating in contexts similar to the two countries being studied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 221-231"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In global port competitions, container port service quality (CPSQ) plays a critical role in determining user satisfaction and port competitiveness. Despite numerous empirical research efforts on the relationship between CPSQ and customer satisfaction, few studies have analysed the configurational effects of CPSQ on customer satisfaction. To address a gap in research, this study examines the factors that influence customer satisfaction among port users, including cargo owners and logistics service providers. The focus is on container ports in non-transshipment ports in South Korea, as well as a transshipment port in Singapore, which are representative of major global maritime countries. In this study, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied to a sample of 99 in South Korea and 175 from Singapore to understand the causal configurations of CPSQ factors, including resources, outcomes, processes, management, image and social responsibility determining the level of satisfaction of port users. The findings using current configurational thinking through fsQCA can assist academics in generating valuable insights that are closely in line with the intricate realities of global port competitions. This approach can also provide practical implications for managers operating in contexts similar to the two countries being studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Who Gets What? A user perspective on initial credit allocation in Tradable Mobility Credit Schemes Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer The influence mechanisms of transport infrastructure on China’s domestic trade: Evidence from trade weight data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1