Pilots’ desire to become future space tourism pilots: Polynomial regression using response surface analysis

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.032
Robert A. Goehlich , Ralf Bebenroth
{"title":"Pilots’ desire to become future space tourism pilots: Polynomial regression using response surface analysis","authors":"Robert A. Goehlich ,&nbsp;Ralf Bebenroth","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the impact of pilots’ motivation on their desire to be space tourism pilots or to remain in their current occupation (adherence). We analyzed the feedback obtained from a survey questionnaire on a sample consisting of 106 pilots with flying experience. In particular, we compared the pilots’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to investigate two outcomes: the desire to become future <em>space</em> pilots or to remain as <em>air</em> pilots. Applying the self-determination theory, we found that intrinsic motivation mattered more than extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, by applying response surface analysis as our statistical tool, it was revealed that motivation for the desire to be space pilots differed from that for adherence. To be more precise, motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic) correlated positively with desire to become space pilots, with higher motivation being associated with a steeper increase. In contrast, motivation correlated negatively with adherence (maintaining status quo). Moreover, pilots who experienced mid-level motivation preferred to stay at their “old” profession while highly motivated pilots were less hesitant to become space pilots. Further, we discovered that for desire a linear effect of motivation was predominant, while for adherence a quadratic effect of motivation was more pronounced. The policy and managerial implications of the results are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 509-520"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of pilots’ motivation on their desire to be space tourism pilots or to remain in their current occupation (adherence). We analyzed the feedback obtained from a survey questionnaire on a sample consisting of 106 pilots with flying experience. In particular, we compared the pilots’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to investigate two outcomes: the desire to become future space pilots or to remain as air pilots. Applying the self-determination theory, we found that intrinsic motivation mattered more than extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, by applying response surface analysis as our statistical tool, it was revealed that motivation for the desire to be space pilots differed from that for adherence. To be more precise, motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic) correlated positively with desire to become space pilots, with higher motivation being associated with a steeper increase. In contrast, motivation correlated negatively with adherence (maintaining status quo). Moreover, pilots who experienced mid-level motivation preferred to stay at their “old” profession while highly motivated pilots were less hesitant to become space pilots. Further, we discovered that for desire a linear effect of motivation was predominant, while for adherence a quadratic effect of motivation was more pronounced. The policy and managerial implications of the results are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞行员成为未来太空旅游飞行员的愿望:响应面分析的多项式回归
在本研究中,我们调查了飞行员的动机对他们成为太空旅游飞行员的愿望或留在他们目前的职业(坚持)的影响。我们分析了106名有飞行经验的飞行员的问卷调查反馈。特别是,我们比较了飞行员的内在动机和外在动机,以调查两种结果:成为未来太空飞行员的愿望或继续担任飞行员。运用自我决定理论,我们发现内在动机比外在动机更重要。此外,通过应用响应面分析作为我们的统计工具,揭示了渴望成为太空飞行员的动机与坚持的动机不同。更确切地说,动机(内在和外在)与成为太空飞行员的愿望呈正相关,动机越高,增长越快。相反,动机与坚持(维持现状)负相关。此外,经历过中等激励的飞行员更愿意留在他们的“老”职业,而高度激励的飞行员则不太犹豫成为太空飞行员。此外,我们发现,对于欲望,动机的线性效应占主导地位,而对于坚持,动机的二次效应更为明显。讨论了研究结果对政策和管理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Balancing innovation and safety: Public preferences for autonomous vehicle testing in Australia Drivers of public inter-organizational collaboration in area-oriented transport infrastructure planning: A comparative analysis of four Dutch cases The linkages between high-speed rail network structure and inter-city human mobility patterns: A dual-network approach A game-theoretic approach for pricing policy under urban rail mixed passenger–freight transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1