Decision and coordination of WEEE closed-loop supply chain with risk aversion under the cap-and-trade regulation

IF 10 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Production Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109477
Fuli Zhou , Chenchen Zhang , Sunil Tiwari , Xingjun Huang , Saurabh Pratap
{"title":"Decision and coordination of WEEE closed-loop supply chain with risk aversion under the cap-and-trade regulation","authors":"Fuli Zhou ,&nbsp;Chenchen Zhang ,&nbsp;Sunil Tiwari ,&nbsp;Xingjun Huang ,&nbsp;Saurabh Pratap","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driven by the soaring consumption of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), the semiconductor industry is facing sustainable development challenges such as energy management and carbon emissions. The waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) management practice could contribute to achieving sustainability in the semiconductor industry through the remanufacturing business. Considering the collection quality heterogeneity and its potential influences on the WEEE remanufacturing process, this paper tries to explore the decision-making strategy and coordination mechanism of the WEEE closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) under the cap-and-trade regulation (CATR). The Stackelberg game model is formulated to address this context consisting of a manufacturer with risk avoidance and a retailer with risk neutrality. Besides, we disclose the specific influence of WEEE collection quality on the strategic decision-making of CLSC members under decentralized and centralized modes. Additionally, the revenue and cost-sharing contract is designed to facilitate coordination within the CLSC, and numerical experiments are performed to help better understand the strategic decision-making and effectiveness of the designed contract mechanism. Results show that within a certain threshold of WEEE collection quality, both recycling rate and total profit increase as collection quality improves, while unit wholesale and retail prices of EEE decrease. Conversely, as the risk aversion of the manufacturer increases, the return rate of WEEE decreases, while the wholesale price and retail price per unit of EEE rise. Under the joint influence of the unit carbon emission quota trading price and risk aversion, the unit carbon emission quota trading price exacerbates the impact of manufacturer risk aversion on the return rate. The revenue and cost-sharing contract also contributes to achieving WEEE CLSC coordination under specific conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 109477"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven by the soaring consumption of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), the semiconductor industry is facing sustainable development challenges such as energy management and carbon emissions. The waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) management practice could contribute to achieving sustainability in the semiconductor industry through the remanufacturing business. Considering the collection quality heterogeneity and its potential influences on the WEEE remanufacturing process, this paper tries to explore the decision-making strategy and coordination mechanism of the WEEE closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) under the cap-and-trade regulation (CATR). The Stackelberg game model is formulated to address this context consisting of a manufacturer with risk avoidance and a retailer with risk neutrality. Besides, we disclose the specific influence of WEEE collection quality on the strategic decision-making of CLSC members under decentralized and centralized modes. Additionally, the revenue and cost-sharing contract is designed to facilitate coordination within the CLSC, and numerical experiments are performed to help better understand the strategic decision-making and effectiveness of the designed contract mechanism. Results show that within a certain threshold of WEEE collection quality, both recycling rate and total profit increase as collection quality improves, while unit wholesale and retail prices of EEE decrease. Conversely, as the risk aversion of the manufacturer increases, the return rate of WEEE decreases, while the wholesale price and retail price per unit of EEE rise. Under the joint influence of the unit carbon emission quota trading price and risk aversion, the unit carbon emission quota trading price exacerbates the impact of manufacturer risk aversion on the return rate. The revenue and cost-sharing contract also contributes to achieving WEEE CLSC coordination under specific conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限额与交易监管下风险规避的报废电子电气设备闭环供应链决策与协调
随着电子电气设备(EEE)消费量的剧增,半导体产业面临着能源管理和碳排放等可持续发展的挑战。废旧电子电气设备(WEEE)管理实践可以通过再制造业务促进半导体行业的可持续发展。考虑到报废电子电气设备回收质量异质性及其对再制造过程的潜在影响,本文试图探讨限额与交易监管下报废电子电气设备闭环供应链的决策策略和协调机制。Stackelberg博弈模型是为了解决这种情况而制定的,这种情况由风险规避的制造商和风险中立的零售商组成。此外,我们揭示了在分散和集中两种模式下,报废电子电气设备收集质量对CLSC成员战略决策的具体影响。此外,收入和成本分担合同旨在促进CLSC内部的协调,并进行了数值实验,以帮助更好地理解所设计的合同机制的战略决策和有效性。结果表明,在一定的报废电子电气设备收集质量阈值范围内,随着收集质量的提高,报废电子电气设备的回收率和总利润均增加,而单位批发零售价格下降。反之,随着制造商风险规避程度的提高,报废电子电气设备的退货率降低,而单位报废电子电气设备的批发价格和零售价格上升。在单位碳排放配额交易价格和风险规避的共同影响下,单位碳排放配额交易价格加剧了制造商风险规避对收益率的影响。收入和成本分担合同也有助于在特定条件下实现WEEE CLSC协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
期刊最新文献
Promoting virtual power plant investments: Energy vs. capacity subsidies Fostering circular economy capabilities through digital- and circular-oriented strategies for boosting triple bottom line performance Do green firms select and terminate supply chain partners based on sustainability criteria? International evidence Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based resilience reconfiguration approach of supply chain system-of-systems under disruption risks The impact of risk propagation on the robustness of R&D networks: A higher-order interaction perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1